Philosophy: logic Books

a huge range and FREE tracked UK delivery on ALL orders.

Read more less

Book SynopsisStephen Langton (c.1228), later Archbishop of Canterbury, was a prominent master of theology, belonging to the first generation of scholars working at the faculty of theology of the nascent University of Paris. The Quaestiones Theologiae constitute his chief speculative work. Book III, volume 1, offers a critical edition of 24 disputed questions on Christology and faith. Each question is accompanied by a critical apparatus and source notes. The edition is preceded by an extensive analysis of Langton''s views. The volume also contains an important supplement to the study of the whole manuscript tradition of Langton''s QQuaestiones Theologiae and offers the first general stemma codicum of the Quaestiones.Table of ContentsAcknowledgements Abbreviations and Editorial Policies Introduction Overview 1: Christology 2: Faith 3: Philological Introduction 4: List of Stemmata Codicum 5: Quaestiones Theologiae - Liber III, Tomus 1 Extra Indicem Bibliography Analytical Index Index of Names Biblical Index

Read more less

Book SynopsisWhen should I change my mind? What can I believe and what must I doubt? In this new philosophy of good reasons Wayne C. Booth exposes five dogmas of modernism that have too often inhibited efforts to answer these questions. Modern dogmas teach that you cannot reason about values and that the job of thought is to doubt whatever can be doubted, and they leave those who accept them crippled in their efforts to think and talk together about whatever concerns them most. They have willed upon us a befouled rhetorical climate in which people are driven to two self-destructive extremesdefenders of reason becoming confined to ever narrower notions of logical or experimental proof and defenders of values becoming more and more irresponsible in trying to defend the heart, the gut, or the gonads. Booth traces the consequences of modernist assumptions through a wide range of inquiry and action: in politics, art, music, literature, and in personal efforts to find identity or a self. In casting doubt on systematic doubt, the author finds that the dogmas are being questioned in almost every modern discipline. Suggesting that they be replaced with a rhetoric of systematic assent, Booth discovers a vast, neglected reservoir of good reasonsmany of them known to classical students of rhetoric, some still to be explored. These good reasons are here restored to intellectual respectability, suggesting the possibility of widespread new inquiry, in all fields, into the question, When should I change my mind?

Read more less

Book SynopsisThis study is an introduction to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as well as an analysis of Kant's ideas. Intended to be read in conjunction with the philosopher's text, the commentary systematically examines the Critique chapter by chapter.Table of ContentsI: Introductory II: The Transcendental Aesthetic III: The Transcendental Deduction of the Categories IV: The Individual Categories and Their Proofs V: Kant's Attitude to Material Idealism. The Thing-in-Itself VI: The Paralogisms and the Antinomies VII: Theology and the Ideas of Reason Index Index of Comments on Particular Passages

Read more less

Book SynopsisIn this volume, Haack includes the complete text of Deviant Logic, as well as five additional papers that expand and update it. Two of these essays critique fuzzy logic, while three augment Deviant Logic's treatment of deduction and logical truth.

Read more less

Book SynopsisMcCawley supplements his earlier book-which covers such topics as presuppositional logic, the logic of mass terms and nonstandard quantifiers, and fuzzy logic-with new material on the logic of conditional sentences, linguistic applications of type theory, Anil Gupta's work on principles of identity, and the generalized quantifier approach to the logical properties of determiners.

Read more less

Book SynopsisA new reading of Hegel's Science of Logic through the history of European mathematics. Conceptual Harmonies develops an original account of G. W. F. Hegel's perplexing Science of Logic from a simple insight: philosophical and mathematical thought have shaped each other since classical times. Situating Science of Logic within the rise of modern mathematics, Redding stresses Hegel's attention to Pythagorean ratios, Platonic reason, and Aristotle's geometrically inspired logic. He then explores how later traditions shaped Hegel's world, through both Leibniz and new forms of algebraic geometry. This enlightening reading recovers an overlooked stream in Hegel's philosophy that remains, Redding argues, important for contemporary conceptions of logic.Trade Review“The erudition and scope of Redding’s new book are staggering. This is a very fine book on the history of ancient logic and mathematics and its modern German reception, and it is also a major contribution to Hegel studies and philosophy. We finally have a clear and compelling answer to the question, What did Hegel actually think logic was? Redding has shown us the deep philosophical importance of that answer.” -- Robert B. Pippin, University of Chicago“Conceptual Harmonies powerfully challenges a long-standing barrier to a full appreciation of Hegel’s logic: the assumption that, given his trenchant critique of all ‘formalisms,’ Hegel’s logic is in no way mathematical. With his characteristic erudition and insight, Redding guides readers through a history of logic and mathematics from Plato to the twentieth century, toward an entirely new understanding of Hegelian logic. Redding’s latest is a must-read for anyone interested in Hegel and the history of logic, proving once again that Redding is one of the most original, rigorous, and historically sensitive interpreters of Hegel writing in any language.” -- Karen Ng, Vanderbilt University“In Conceptual Harmonies, Redding makes a breathtakingly original case for a new understanding of Hegel’s Logic. Expanding the examination of Hegel’s sources well beyond the standard Aristotelian and Kantian texts, Redding rewrites the history of logic to show that Hegel anticipated many developments in the mid-nineteenth century and beyond. This is a major achievement that opens up a new line of research into Hegel’s though -- Dean Moyar, Johns Hopkins UniversityTable of ContentsHegel’s Texts: Translations and Abbreviations Preface Introduction Beginning: Hegel’s Classicism 1 Logic, Mathematics, and Philosophy in Fourth-Century Athens 2 Hegel and the Platonic Origins of Aristotle’s Syllogistic 3 The General Significance of Neoplatonic Harmonic Theory for Hegel’s Account of Magnitude Middle: Classical Meets Modern 4 Geometry and Philosophy in Hegel, Schelling, Carnot, and Grassmann 5 The Role of Analysis Situs in Leibniz’s Modernization of Logic 6 Hegel’s Supersession of Leibniz and Newton: The Limitations of Calculus and Logical Calculus End: The Modern as Redetermined Classical 7 Exploiting Resources within Aristotle for the Rehabilitation of the Syllogism 8 The Return of Leibnizian Logic in the Nineteenth Century: From Boole to Heyting 9 Hegel among the New Leibnizians: Judgments 10 Hegel beyond the New Leibnizians: Syllogisms Conclusion: The God at the Terminus of Hegel’s Logic Acknowledgments Notes Bibliography Index

Read more less

Book SynopsisWestern civilization is over. So begins Jan Zwicky’s trenchant exploration of the roots of global cultural and ecological collapse. Once Upon a Time in the West documents how a narrow epistemological style has left us blind to critical features of reality, and how the terrifying consequences of that shuttered vision are now unfolding.Trade Review“Zwicky's distinctive voice – warm, wise, sometimes colloquial or cutting – brings together these essays on diverse topics. Her sensibility is of course poetic, but also critical in the best sense: rigorous, probing, and committed. This is an engaging and enlightening portrait of a fine thinker in action.” Mark Kingwell, University of Toronto and author of Singular Creatures: Robots, Rights, and the Politics of Posthumanism“Lyric philosophy of the highest calibre. Jan Zwicky addresses the dilemmas we as a species are faced with today with great lucidity, seamlessly weaving together a wide variety of themes from philosophy, poetry, and ecology. Anyone interested in understanding the more-than-human world and our place in it is bound to find food for thought in these beautifully written and provoking philosophical essays.” Leonor María Martínez Serrano, University of Córdoba and author of Breathing Earth: The Polyphonic Lyric of Robert Bringhurst

Read more less

Book SynopsisTrade ReviewFatalism, the sorrowful erasure of possibilities, is the philosophical problem at the heart of this book. To witness the intellectual exuberance and bravado with which the young Wallace attacks this problem, the ambition and elegance of the solution he works out so that possibility might be resurrected, is to mourn, once again, the possibilities that have been lost. -- Rebecca Newberger Goldstein, author of Thirty-six Arguments for the Existence of God: A Work of Fiction As an early glimpse at the preoccupations of one of the 20th century's most compelling and philosophical authors, it is invaluable, and Wallace's conclusion... is simply elegant. Publishers Weekly This book is for any reader who has enjoyed the works of Wallace and for philosophy students specializing in fatalism. Library Journal [A] tough and impressive book.Financial Times -- Anthony Gottlieb Financial Times an excellent summary of Wallace's thought and writing which shows how his philosophical interests were not purely cerebral, but arose from, and fed into, his emotional and ethical concerns. -- Robert Potts Times Literary Supplement Fate, Time, and Laguage contains a great deal of first-rate philosophy throughout, and not least in Wallace's extraordinarily professional and ambitious essay... -- Daniel Speak Notre Dame Philosophical Review Valuable and interesting. -- James Ley Australian Literary Review A philosophical argument that deserves a place in any college-level library interested in modern philosophical debate. A lively, debative tone keeps this accessible to newcomers. Midwest Book ReviewTable of ContentsPreface, by Steven M. Cahn and Maureen Eckert Introduction: A Head That Throbbed Heartlike: The Philosophical Mind of David Foster Wallace, by James Ryerson Part I: The Background Introduction, by Steven M. Cahn 1. Fatalism, by Richard Taylor 2. Professor Taylor on Fatalism, by John Turk Saunders 3. Fatalism and Ability, by Richard Taylor 4. Fatalism and Ability II, by Peter Makepeace 5. Fatalism and Linguistic Reform, by John Turk Saunders 6. Fatalism and Professor Taylor, by Bruce Aune 7. Taylor's Fatal Fallacy, by Raziel Abelson 8. A Note on Fatalism, by Richard Taylor 9. Tautology and Fatalism, by Richard Sharvy 10. Fatalistic Arguments, by Steven Cahn 11. Comment, by Richard Taylor 12. Fatalism and Ordinary Language, by John Turk Saunders 13. Fallacies in Taylor's "Fatalism," by Charles D. Brown Part II: The Essay 14. Renewing the Fatalist Conversation, by Maureen Eckert 15. Richard Taylor's "Fatalism" and the Semantics of Physical Modality, by David Foster Wallace Part III: Epilogue 16. David Foster Wallace as Student: A Memoir, by Jay Garfield Appendix: The Problem of Future Contingencies, by Richard Taylor

Read more less

a huge range and FREE tracked UK delivery on ALL orders.

Read more less

Book SynopsisExamines a range of logical concepts and methods as they relate to philosophical investigation in a larger context. Brenner aims to expose the depth of logic and its relevance to philosophy in general. He also discusses at length the work of Plato, Aristotle, Descartes, Kant and Wittgenstein.Trade Review“Brenner’s book is, for a number of reasons, very much worth reading. . . . It provides a solid, eminently readable, and gimmick-free introduction to categorical and sentential logic, and contains several philosophical positions for the student to practice analyzing. Instructors who emphasize argument analysis in their introductory philosophy courses should give this book serious consideration.” —American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly“I regard this book as a welcome and valuable introduction to philosophy and logic and their integration. I would certainly recommend it as a first year text.” —Philosophical Investigations

Read more less

Book SynopsisTrade Review"Prominent philosopher-scientists, from Abner Shimony to Paul Teller, contribute articles (some revisions of seminal publications) detailing presumptions and ambiguities of quantum measurement, written especially for the nonspecialist. Some highlights include Mermin's powerful (and amusing) 'device' to highlight the 'paradox' of quantum correlations, Linda Wessels' thorough catalog of specific implicit 'axioms' of the discussion, and Cushing's prospective overview. Other gems, including some simplified models of Bell's arguments, and a range of ontological frameworks—from realism to 'holism'—make this an urgently recommended work for all colleges." —Choice"The papers collected here demonstrate how analytic philosophy of science should be done. Quantum mechanics may be mysterious in some of its aspects, but those who wish to peddle mysticism on the basis on quantum theory would do well to stay away from this excellent collection of philosophical essays." —Canadian Philosophical Reviews"These papers, collected from a 1986 conference focusing on John S. Bell's celebrated 1964 theorem, examine the philosophical issues posed by quantum theory. The book introduces Bell's theorem so that readers can understand the papers, but it is not a technical overview of the theorem or of quantum mechanics." —Science News

Read more less

Book SynopsisContemporary western philosophy divides into three broad traditions: the analytical, the continental, and the historical. In the latter half of the twentieth century, analytical philosophy was dominant in the English-speaking world and tended to ignore the other two traditions. Now, however, analytical philosophy is less isolationist. It has come to appreciate the vitality of historical philosophy.Given their commonality of interests and shared appreciation of the values of conceptual clarity and argumentative rigour, it is particularly appropriate that there should be engagement between the main English-language tradition and the philosophy of Aquinas and, more broadly, of Thomism. The essays in this collection range widely across the fields of metaphysics, epistemology, philosophy of mind and action, and theory of value with most linking analytical and Aristotelian-Thomistic ideas and some focusing on Aquinas in particular.This collection is distinctive in content anTrade Review“This is a collection of essays on varied philosophical topics of importance. The essays are interesting, and often controversial. The authors are sympathetic to both the Thomist and the analytical tradition, but they are not afraid to be critical of each.” —Anthony Kenny, Oxford University * The Journal of Modern History *

Read more less

Book SynopsisThe thirteenth-century logician Lambert of Auxerre was well known for his Summa Lamberti, or simply Logica, written in the mid-1250s, which became an authoritative textbook on logic in the Western tradition. Our knowledge of medieval logic comes in great part from Lambert''s Logica and three other texts: William of Sherwood''s Introductiones in logicam, Peter of Spain''s Tractatus, and Roger Bacon''s Summulae dialectics. Of the four, Lambert''s work is the best example of question-summas that proceed principally by asking and answering questions on the subject matter. Thomas S. Maloney''s translation of Logica, the only complete translation of this work in any language, is a milestone in the study of medieval logic. More than simply a translation, Maloney''s project is a critical, comprehensive study of Lambert''s logic situated in the context of his contemporaries and predecessors. As such, it offers a wealth of annotation and commenTrade Review"Thomas S. Maloney fully commands the primary and secondary sources necessary to elucidate Lambert's Logica. An expert on Roger Bacon's philosophy, he demonstrates a rare proficiency in medieval Latin and Scholastic logic. His references to sources from the ancient (Aristotle and Boethius) and medieval worlds are apposite, perspicuous, and useful. The volume's presentation with an appropriate introduction and commentary in the endnotes will no doubt establish it as an indispensable resource for scholars in the twenty-first century." —Alan Perreiah, University of Kentucky"This is an invaluable addition to the growing library of medieval logic sources available in English. Thomas S. Maloney’s translation is highly readable. His comprehensive overview of the state of research on Lambert’s life and work will be a reference-point for future scholars working on thirteenth-century Latin logic." —Paul Thom, University of Sydney"With this well-crafted translation with a first-rate introduction and notes on Lambert of Auxerre’s Logica, Thomas S. Maloney has again established himself as a very able translator and commentator on thirteenth-century logic. Now many scholars will be able to study Lambert, Roger Bacon, and Peter of Spain in the context of the period 1240–1260. This new and excellent translation will be a great help to all who study medieval philosophy. The introduction contains a comprehensive account of the identity of Lambert of Auxerre." —Jeremiah Hackett, University of South Carolina"This translation of the Summa (or Logica) of Lambert, commonly said to be from Auxerre, is a useful addition to current translations of medieval texts, in particular logical ones. Thomas S. Maloney, the translator, also has written extensive notes and a long introduction. The translation is reliable, with some caveats noted below. The book is very well produced, with a good bibliography." —Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews“Thomas Maloney offers us a critical translation of a mid-thirteenth-century logic text, Logica, or Summa Lamberti, written by Lambert of Auxerre. The translation is replete with notes and includes an extensive bibliography of primary and secondary sources. Prominent histories of western philosophy make scant reference, if any, to Lambert of Auzerre and his Logica . . . so Maloney’s fresh translation and critical introduction may be found relevant to subsequent research in the history of medieval philosophy of logic.” —Comitatus

Read more less

Book SynopsisJames F. Ross is a creative and independent thinker in contemporary metaphysics and philosophy of mind. In this concise metaphysical essay, he argues clearly and analytically that meaning, truth, impossibility, natural necessity, and our intelligent perception of nature fit together into a distinctly realist account of thought and world. Ross articulates a moderate realism about repeatable natural structures and our abstractive ability to discern them that poses a challenge to many of the common assumptions and claims of contemporary analytic philosophy. He develops a broadly Aristotelian metaphysics that recognizes the hidden necessities of things, which are disclosed through the sciences, which ground his account of real impossibility as a kind of vacuity, and which require the immateriality of the human ability to understand. Those ideas are supported by a novel account of false judgment. Ross aims to offer an analytically and historically respectable alternative to the prevailinTrade Review“In Thought and World, James F. Ross synthesizes and develops much of his work from the last two decades; and as he did in his two other major works (Philosophical Theology and Portraying Analogy) he challenges many of the common dogmatic assumptions from the mainstream of analytic philosophy. While relentlessly challenging these assumptions from a unique and unorthodox perspective, he is nonetheless able to masterfully articulate his position using the dialect of philosophical discourse in analytic philosophy.” —John Zeis, Canisius College"Those [philosophers] who feel the need to consider a wider range of views, and who are willing to work through a book that leaves a significant amount of thinking to them, will find it a fascinating and even worldview-changing look into how Aristotelian-Scholastic ideas can be developed today. If a few follow in Ross's footsteps, the path to truth might come to be more clearly marked." —Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews“In this challenge to much of contemporary Anglo-American analytic philosophy, Ross begins from a position of moderate realism, arguing that there are de re (‘of the thing’) necessities hidden in the complexity of nature that overflow our linguistic meaning but are part of de re truth conditions (for example, the genetic coding of organisms was a de re necessity long before we were able or even around to comprehend or discuss it), which leads to a recognition of the independent reality of things and the affirmation of the real sameness of the known and the real.” —Reference and Research Book News“Ross offers a wide-ranging survey of a number of issues and problems, mainly in metaphysics and the philosophy of mind, including modality, counterfactuals, truth, perception and abstraction, consciousness, and the natures or essences of things. . . . He is a self-described ‘structural realist’: he affirms the existence of an objective, mind-independent physical world, the things of which possess real natures that explain and underlie the powers and causal interactions of those things.” —Choice“James Ross’ work Thought and World is far-reaching. . . Ross’ incorporation of the history of philosophy, while still addressing much of the contemporary thought on the issues, makes this book an accessible and solid philosophical work.” —Dialogue“Thought and World pivots on an attractive central idea, namely that the philosophically important modal concepts of possibility, actuality, and necessity are inherently reality-geared in being based upon ‘the intelligible structures in nature and . . . our abstractive ability to discern them.’” —American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly“Thought and World is an important book. It is important because it offers a critical look at much that is taken for granted in contemporary analytic philosophy; it is also important because it offers a cogent argument for a realistic metaphysics . . . . A brilliant book from first to last, Thought and World is an outstanding example, if not in form, then surely in its wealth of ideas and penetrating insights, of the fruitfulness of bringing the best of the philosophic tradition into dialogue with contemporary problems and currents of thought.” —The Review of Metaphysics

Read more less

Book SynopsisThis books covers an important period in the debate over religion and public schools and the legislative history of the fight over federal aid to education from 1918 to 1932.Trade Review“Slawson's book is most concerned with the Smith-Towner Act of 1918 and successor bills that, depending on one's perspective, promised or threatened federal funding, centralization, and control of education throughout the country.” —American Historical Review“This is a solid legislative history of the fight over federal aid to education from 1918 to 1932. The research is thorough and the topic is important.” —John McGreevy, University of Notre Dame". . . The book is an exceptional historical work. Little was known about these issues and the role of the NCWC in protecting the Catholic educational system, while trying, best as could be done in the situation, not to portray the Catholic Church as hostile to public schools. The author left no stone unturned in his relentless quest to report what was going forward, and how people and editors were interpreting, and misinterpreting, what was happening." —American Catholic Studies"In this well-researched volume, Slawson covers an important period in the debate over religion and public schools. Slawson details the conflict over public education between American Catholics and Protestants from the end of WWI to the election of Franklin D. Roosevelt. In a clear and meticulous manner, the author sheds light on a forgotten part of church-state history. Recommended." —Choice"The meticulous and massive documentation (forty-nine pages of endnotes) will make Slawson's study the definitive work on this important but neglected aspect of twentieth-century American Catholicism." —The Catholic Historical Review"Slawson certainly deserves a place on the research shelf in every Catholic school since his work explains the reluctance of Pastors and Bishops in the 40s, 50s, 60s and even the early 70s to accept any governmental financial aid seeing in that a move toward federal control of the schools." —Catholic Library World

Read more less

Book SynopsisThe Semantics of Analogy is the first book-length interpretive study in English of Thomas de Vio Cajetan''s (1469?-1534) classic treatise on analogy. Written in 1498, De Nominum Analogia (On the Analogy of Names) has long been treated as Cajetan''s attempt to systematize Aquinas's theory of analogy. A traditional interpretation regarded it as the official Thomistic treatise on analogy, but current scholarly consensus holds that Cajetan misinterpreted Aquinas and misunderstood the phenomenon of analogy.Both approaches, argues Joshua P. Hochschild, ignore the philosophical and historical context and fail to accurately assess Cajetan''s work. In The Semantics of Analogy, Hochschild reinterprets De Nominum Analogia as a significant philosophical treatise in its own right. He addresses some of the most well-known criticisms of Cajetan''s analogy theory and explicates the later chapters of De Nominum Analogia, which are usually ignored by commentaTrade Review“Cajetan’s work on analogy is ‘the’ classic, systematic account of this logico-linguistic phenomenon and its far-reaching metaphysical and epistemological implications. While historians of philosophy, especially Thomists, tended to evaluate Cajetan’s theory in terms of its faithfulness to Aquinas’ intentions, Hochschild’s work engages it from a systematic philosophical perspective, showing its relevance to contemporary theorizing about the subject, despite its historical and conceptual distance from contemporary research in the field. While always treating Cajetan’s work in its proper historical context, Hochschild’s down-to-earth philosophical style effortlessly closes the conceptual gap between Cajetan and us, breathing new life into Cajetan’s difficult, rarefied philosophical prose.” —Gyula Klima, Fordham University“Students of the Protestant Reformation may remember Cardinal Cajetan as Martin Luther’s key opponent during a crucial early phase of the reformer’s public career. . . . Joshua Hochschild’s careful analysis of Cajetan’s recondite defense of analogy late in the 15th century may yet once again challenge Protestants to become more self-conscious about how they speak about God, themselves, and the world in the early 21st century.” —Books and Culture“In this work, Joshua Hochschild presents the semantic principles of Cajetan’s understanding of analogy, arguing that they should be understood on their own terms and not as a commentary on Aquinas despite the inevitable comparisons between the two thinkers. Hochschild’s work is both readable and well argued and will no doubt expose Cajetan’s writings to a wider audience. Moreover, this volume should appeal to scholars interested in semantics and philosophy of language, as well as those interested in religious language and the history of philosophy.” —Journal of the History of Philosophy“In his study of De nominum analogia, Hochschild sets out to do two things. First, he demolishes what he describes as an outdated paradigm concerning the interpretation of Cajetan’s work. Second, Hochschild gives an explanation and what amounts to a paraphrase of Cajetan’s distinctions and arguments in their order of presentation. . . . this book should certainly be read by Thomists, and by anyone who wants a readable account of what Cajetan actually said.” —Philosophy Reviews“Re-reading this classic text required hermeneutical skills akin to untangling a knot tightened by generations of misreading, so readers engaging in the task with the author can only admire his deft hand. Hochschild sets out to restore the logical-grammatical perspective of the original text. After an illuminating analysis of Aristotle on analogical usage and a brief resume of key figures between Aristotle and Aquinas, Hochschild executes a hermeneutical tour-de-force, using Collingwood, Gadamer, and Thomas Kuhn to initiate a ‘new paradigm,’ one based on identifying the questions Cajetan actually faced rather than reading in the expectations later Thomists brought to the text.” —Nova et Vetera“Hochschild’s book provides a clear exposition of Cajetan’s doctrine and a philosophically intriguing analysis of it. . . . But for historians of philosophy generally, and historians of early modern philosophy of language in particular, Hochschild’s book provides a fabulous introduction to Cajetan’s historically and philosophically important doctrine and is an ideal companion for reading it.” —Philosophy in Review“In The Semantics of Analogy: Rereading Cajetan’s De Nominum Analogia, Joshua Hochschild takes on some of the most difficult issues, and, in a major contribution to the history of analogical discourse, convincingly shows why Cajetan (1469–1534) was not explicating Aquinas’ theory of analogy.” —Modern Theology“Hochschild convincingly argues that, considered as a philosophical response to a Scotistic criticism, Cajetan’s discussion of analogous naming is sophisticated and initially plausible. In general, the book is well written, enjoyable to read, and includes many rich discussions which cannot all be mentioned in a short book review.” —The Thomist“. . . this is an excellent and constructive contribution to a topic that is still of considerable relevance to the philosophical questions surrounding religious language.” —Journal of Theological Studies“This lucid . . . study is an account of Cajetan’s short work, De nominum analogia. After successfully refuting a number of earlier inaccurate accounts of the work’s nature and importance, Hochschild gives a useful extended paraphrase and explanation of the work’s contents. In so doing, he raises a number of interesting issues about late medieval semantics which call for further exploration.” —Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews

Read more less

Book SynopsisA valuable guide on creativity and critical thinking to improve reasoning and decision-making skills Critical thinking skills are essential in virtually any field of study or practice where individuals need to communicate ideas, make decisions, and analyze and solve problems. An Introduction to Critical Thinking and Creativity: Think More, Think Better outlines the necessary tools for readers to become critical as well as creative thinkers. By gaining a practical and solid foundation in the basic principles that underlie critical thinking and creativity, readers will become equipped to think in a more systematic, logical, and imaginative manner. Creativity is needed to generate new ideas to solve problems, and critical thinking evaluates and improves an idea. These concepts are uniquely introduced as a unified whole due to their dependence on each other. Each chapter introduces relevant theories in conjunction with real-life examples and findings Table of ContentsPreface ix 1 Introduction 1 2 Thinking and writing clearly 11 3 Definitions 21 4 Necessary and sufficient conditions 33 5 Linguistic pitfalls 41 6 Truth 53 7 Basic logic 59 8 Identifying arguments 69 9 Valid and sound arguments 75 10 Inductive reasoning 87 11 Argument mapping 95 12 Argument analysis 107 13 Scientific reasoning 113 14 Mill's methods 125 15 Reasoning about causation 133 16 Diagrams of causal processes 141 17 Statistics and probability 145 18 Thinking about values 159 19 Fallacies 173 20 Cognitive biases 185 21 Analogical reasoning 195 22 Making rational decisions 201 23 What is creativity? 215 24 Creative thinking habits 223 Solutions to exercises 233 Bibliography 256 Index 261

Read more less

Book SynopsisThe Critical Thinking Toolkit is a comprehensive compendium that equips readers with the essential knowledge and methods for clear, analytical, logical thinking and critique in a range of scholarly contexts and everyday situations.Table of ContentsAcknowledgments xv Introduction 1 The Very Idea of Critical Thinking 1 Critical thinking in the formal and empirical sciences 2 Critical thinking, critical theory, and critical politics 4 Critical thinking, finitude, and self-understanding 5 Using this book 5 1 Basic Tools for Critical Thinking about Arguments 7 1.1 Claims 7 Beliefs and opinions 8 Simple and complex claims 9 Truth functionality 10 1.2 Arguments 11 Logic vs. eristics 12 Arguments vs. explanations 12 1.3 Premises 13 Enthymemes 14 Identifying premises 14 1.4 Conclusions 16 Argument structure 16 Simple and complex arguments 16 Identifying conclusions 17 2 More Tools for Critical Thinking about Arguments 19 2.1 Deductive and Inductive Arguments 19 Deduction 20 Induction 21 2.2 Conditional Claims 22 Necessary and sufficient conditions 23 Biconditional claims 25 2.3 Classifying and Comparing Claims 26 Comparing claims 26 Classifying single claims 28 2.4 Claims and Definitions 29 Lexical, stipulative, ostensive, and negative definition 30 Extension and intension 30 Generic similarities and specific differences 31 Definiens and definiendum 31 2.5 The Critical Thinker’s “Two Step”: Validity and Soundness/Cogency and Strength 32 Structure before truth 33 2.6 Showing Invalidity by Counterexample 35 3 Tools for Deductive Reasoning with Categories 39 3.1 Thinking Categorically 39 Types and tokens 39 3.2 Categorical Logic 40 Quality, quantity, and standard form 40 Venn diagrams and the meaning of categorical claims 42 Distribution and its implications 44 Existential import 45 3.3 Translating English Claims to Standard Form 46 Implicit quantifiers 46 Individuals 47 Getting the verb right 47 Adverbials 48 Trust your instincts 50 A caveat 50 3.4 Formal Deduction with Categories: Immediate Inferences 50 Equivalences 51 Conversion 52 Contraposition 53 Obversion 56 The Aristotelian and Boolean Squares of Opposition 58 3.5 Formal Deduction with Categories: Syllogisms 63 Categorical syllogisms 64 Major and minor terms 64 Mood and figure 65 The Venn diagram test for validity 66 Five easy rules for evaluating categorical syllogisms 69 Gensler star test 70 4 Tools for Deductive Reasoning with Claims 72 4.1 Propositional vs. Categorical Logics 72 Translating claims into propositional logic 73 Truth tables for claims 76 Testing for validity and invalidity with truth tables 78 Indirect truth tables 79 Strange validity 82 4.2 Common Deductively Valid Forms 83 Modus ponens 83 Modus tollens 84 Hypothetical syllogism 86 Disjunctive syllogism 86 Constructive and destructive dilemmas 87 4.3 Equivalences 90 Double negation 90 Tautology 91 Commutativity 91 Associativity 92 Transposition 92 Material implication 93 Material equivalence 93 Exportation 94 Distribution 95 DeMorgan’s Law 95 4.4 Formal Deduction with Forms and Equivalences 96 Three simple rules 97 4.5 Common Formal Fallacies 101 Affirming the consequent 101 Denying the antecedent 103 Affirming a disjunct 104 5 Tools for Detecting Informal Fallacies 107 5.1 Critical Thinking, Critical Deceiving, and the “Two Step” 107 5.2 Subjectivist Fallacy 109 5.3 Genetic Fallacies 112 5.4 Ad Hominem Fallacies: Direct, Circumstantial, and Tu Quoque 113 Direct 114 Circumstantial 115 Tu quoque 118 5.5 Appeal to Emotions or Appeal to the Heart (argumentum ad passiones) 120 Appeal to pity (argumentum ad misericordiam) 120 Appeal to fear (argumentum ad metum) 122 Appeal to guilt 122 5.6 Appeal to Force (argumentum ad baculum) 124 5.7 Appeal to Ignorance (argumentum ad ignorantiam) 125 Negative evidence and no evidence 126 5.8 Appeal to Novelty (argumentum ad novitatem) 127 5.9 Appeal to the People (argumentum ad populum) 128 Bandwagon 128 Appeal to snobbery 129 Appeal to vanity 129 5.10 Appeal to Unqualified Authority (argumentum ad verecundiam) 132 5.11 Fallacy of Accident 135 5.12 False Dilemma 137 5.13 Semantic and Syntactic Fallacies 138 Ambiguity, two types: lexical and syntactic 138 Vagueness vs. ambiguity 139 Vagueness, two types: degree and context 139 Equivocation and fallacious amphiboly 140 5.14 Begging the Question (petitio principii) 143 5.15 Question-Begging Sentences 144 5.16 Missing the Point (ignoratio elenchi) 145 5.17 Fallacy of Composition 146 5.18 Fallacy of Division 148 5.19 Is-Ought Fallacy 149 5.20 Appeal to Tradition 152 5.21 Quoting Out of Context 153 5.22 Red Herring 158 5.23 Straw Man and Fidelity 159 5.24 Hasty Fallacization 161 5.25 A Brief Argument Clinic 162 Context 162 Charity 162 Productivity 163 6 Tools for Critical Thinking about Induction 166 6.1 Inductive vs. Deductive Arguments Again 166 6.2 Analogies and Arguments from Analogy 167 Criticizing analogies 168 6.3 Fallacies about Causation 170 Post hoc ergo propter hoc 170 Correlation is not always causation 171 Cum hoc ergo propter hoc 172 Neglecting a common cause 172 Oversimplified and contributing causes 174 Proximate, remote, and intervening causes 175 6.4 Inductive Statistical Reasoning 177 Sampling: random and biased 177 Stratification 178 The gambler’s fallacy 179 Averages: mean, median, and mode 179 Distributions 180 6.5 Base Rate Fallacy 182 6.6 Slippery Slope and Reductio ad Absurdum 184 6.7 Hasty Generalization 188 6.8 Mill’s Five Methods 189 1. Method of Concomitant Variation 189 2. Method of Agreement 190 3. Method of Difference 191 4. Joint Method of Agreement and Difference 191 5. Method of Residues 192 7 Tools for Critical Thinking about Experience and Error 195 7.1 Error Theory 195 7.2 Cognitive Errors 197 Perceptual error 197 Memory 199 Stress and trauma 201 Projection 202 Transference 203 Confirmation bias 203 Denial 204 A little bit of knowledge … 204 The fallacy of false consensus 205 Naïve realism 205 7.3 Environment and Error 206 Obstruction and distraction 206 Duration 207 Motion 207 Distance 207 Context and comparison 208 Availability error 208 7.4 Background and Ignorance 209 7.5 Misleading Language 210 Suspect the negative 210 Implications and connotations 210 Damning by silence or understatement 211 7.6 Standpoint and Disagreement 211 The mosaic of truth 213 Incommensurability and deep disagreement 213 8 Tools for Critical Thinking about Justification 215 8.1 Knowledge: The Basics 215 Ordinary belief and hinge propositions 216 Plato’s definition of knowledge 216 Chisholm and belief 217 8.2 Feelings as Evidence 219 Some important features of all types of feelings 220 The importance of distinguishing sense experience from emotion 222 8.3 Skepticism and Sensory Experience 223 The weaknesses of sense experience as evidence 224 The strengths of sense experience as evidence 227 8.4 Emotions and Evidence 229 The weaknesses of emotional experience as evidence 229 The strengths of emotional experience as evidence 232 Tips for eliminating the negative effects of emotions 235 8.5 Justifying Values 237 The role of moral values in arguments 238 Four common views of value judgment 239 Tools for reasoning about moral values 241 8.6 Justification: The Basics 242 Justification and the problem of access 243 No reasons not to believe 244 Beyond a reasonable doubt 244 Obligation and permission to believe 245 8.7 Truth and Responsible Belief 246 Why is responsibility relevant to belief? 247 Responsibility without truth 247 8.8 How Does Justification Work? 248 Claims as evidence 248 Experience as evidence 249 8.9 A Problem for Responsible Belief 251 Gettier cases 252 Processes and probabilities as justification 253 Varieties of externalism 254 8.10 Evidence: Weak and Strong 256 Direct and indirect evidence 256 Testimony as evidence 258 Strong enough evidence? 259 Suppressed evidence fallacy 260 Four tips for recognizing “good” evidence 261 8.11 Justification: Conclusions 266 9 Tools for Critical Thinking about Science 271 9.1 Science and the Value of Scientific Reasoning 271 Useful, durable, and pleasant goods 271 An agreement engine 272 A path to knowledge 272 9.2 The Purview of Science 273 The limits of empiricism 274 What is and what ought to be 274 Different kinds of science 275 Critiques of science 279 9.3 Varieties of Possibility and Impossibility 280 Logical possibility 281 Physical possibility 281 Other types of possibility 282 9.4 Scientific Method 283 Causal explanation 283 Observation 284 Verification and falsification 285 Paradigms: normal and revolutionary science 288 9.5 Unfalsifiability and Falsification Resistance 289 Ad hoc hypotheses and the fallacy of unfalsifiability 290 Falsification and holism: hypothesis vs. theory 291 The “no true Scotsman” fallacy 291 9.6 Experiments and Other Tests 293 Controls and variables 293 Epidemiological studies 294 Personal experience and case studies 295 Blinding and double blinding 296 In vitro studies 297 Non-human animal studies 297 9.7 Six Criteria for Abduction 298 1. Predictive power 299 2. Scope 299 3. Coherence with established fact 300 4. Repeatability 300 5. Simplicity 300 6. Fruitfulness 301 9.8 Bad Science 302 Junk science 302 Pseudo-science 302 Fringe science 303 Ideological science 303 10 Tools from Rhetoric, Critical Theory, and Politics 305 10.1 Meta-Narratives 305 Stories that govern stories plus a whole lot more 305 Governing, varying, and disintegrating narratives 306 10.2 Governing Tropes 308 Simile, analogy, metaphor, and allegory 308 Metonymy and synecdoche 309 10.3 The Medium Is the Message 311 10.4 Voice 313 10.5 Semiotics: Critically Reading Signs 316 Peirce and Saussure 316 Of virgins, ghosts, and cuckolds 316 The semiological problem 317 10.6 Deconstruction 319 Critique of presence 320 Undermining binaries 320 The politics of deconstruction 321 10.7 Foucault’s Critique of Power 322 Archeological method 323 Genealogical method 323 Microphysics of power and biopower 324 Normalization 324 10.8 The Frankfurt School: Culture Critique 326 Lipstick is ideology 326 Makers who are made 327 The Dialectic of Enlightenment 327 10.9 Class Critiques 328 Classical Marxism: superstructure and substructure 328 It’s the class hierarchy, stupid 329 Exploitation, alienation, and class struggle 329 False consciousness 330 Criticizing class critique 330 10.10 Feminist and Gender Critiques 332 Politics and gender 333 Feminist critique 335 Text and gender 336 10.11 Critiques of Race and Racism 338 Scientific critique of race 338 Liberal critique of race 338 Marxist critique of race 339 Critical race theory 340 10.12 Traditionalist and Historicist Critiques 341 A history of thinking about history 342 Views from nowhere 342 The harm in forgetting 343 The importance of careful listening 343 10.13 Ecological Critiques 345 Consumption and pollution 345 Ecological justice 346 Non-human life 347 Appendix: Recommended Web Sites 349 Index 351

Read more less

Book SynopsisThis book explains in down-to-earth language what analytical philosophy is, and presupposes no previous knowledge of the subject. Analytical philosophers aim at obtaining insight into the traditional topics of philosophy by logical, conceptual and linguistic analysis. In this book William Charlton answers relativist attacks on this ambition and argues that its methods can still provide fresh insight into the traditional problems of philosophy. Taking such central philosophical problems as meaning, time, causation and thought, the author shows why they are problems for philosophy rather than for any other discipline, and thereby illustrates and supports a new general theory of the nature and scope of philosophical enquiry. The Analytic Ambition is both an introduction to readers fresh to philosophy and a challenge to professional thinking that has become set in its ways.Table of ContentsWhat is analytical philosophy?; outline of a theory; meaning; being, existence and truth; time; change and causation; teleology and mental states; moral concepts; conceiving and understanding; consciousness; thought and philosophy.

Read more less

Book SynopsisIn this book Stephen Makin offers a striking new account of some intriguing but neglected arguments -- indifference arguments -- and of the presocratic atomism underpinned by indifference reasoning.Table of ContentsCh.1 Introduction Ch.2 The Eleatics Ch.3 The Atomists Ch.4 Some Other Indifference Arguments Ch.5 The Form of Indifference Arguments Ch.6 Epistemological Indifference Arguments Ch.7 Indifference Arguments Without Epistemology.

Read more less

Book SynopsisA presentation of and sustained argument for a particular view about propositions which express contrary-to-fact conditionals, including the author's infamous defense of realism about possible worlds.Trade Review"'Contrary-to-fact conditionals have provided logical analysts with fascinating puzzles. (This book) has a unitary theme presented clearly and attractively for the most part with only the unavoidable minimum of formal apparatus. The theme is pursued confidently and relentlessly without evasions or qualifications." Times Literary Supplement "This is an excellent book. It combines shrewd philosophical sense with a fine technical expertise. The statement of views is concise and forthright." Kit Fine, Mind "This essay is a virtuoso performance." British Journal for the Philosophy of Science "Beautifully and lucidly written and full of clever ideas. It contains very many philosophical insights and comparisons." J. J. C. Smart, Australasian Journal of PhilosophyTable of ContentsPreface. Acknowledgements. 1. An Analysis of Counterfactuals. Introduction. Strict Conditionals. Variably Strict Conditionals. The Limit Assumption. 'Might' Counterfactuals and Outer Modalities. Impossible Antecedents. True Antecedents. Counterfactual Fallacies. Potentialities. 2. Reformulations. Multiple Modalities. Propositional Quantifiers. Comparative Similarity. Similarity Measures. Comparative Possibility. Cotenability. Selection Functions. The Selection Operator. 3. Comparisons. The Metalinguistic Theory: Implicit Premisis. The Metalinguistic Theory: Factual Premises. The Metalinguistic Theory: Laws of Nature. Stalnaker's Theory. 4. Foundations. Possible Worlds. Similarity. 5. Analogies. Conditional Obligation. 'When Next' and 'When Last'. Contextually Definite Descriptions. 6. Logics. Completeness Results. Decidability Results. Derived Modal Logics. Appendix: Related Writings by David Lewis. Index.

Read more less

Book SynopsisThis title is David Lewis's presentation of and sustained argument for a particular view about propositions which express contrary-to-fact conditionals, including his infamous defence of realism about possible worlds.Trade Review"'Contrary-to-fact conditionals have provided logical analysts with fascinating puzzles. (This book) has a unitary theme presented clearly and attractively for the most part with only the unavoidable minimum of formal apparatus. The theme is pursued confidently and relentlessly without evasions or qualifications." Times Literary Supplement "This is an excellent book. It combines shrewd philosophical sense with a fine technical expertise. The statement of views is concise and forthright." Kit Fine, Mind "This essay is a virtuoso performance." British Journal for the Philosophy of Science "Beautifully and lucidly written and full of clever ideas. It contains very many philosophical insights and comparisons." J. J. C. Smart, Australasian Journal of PhilosophyTable of ContentsPreface. Acknowledgements. 1. An Analysis of Counterfactuals. Introduction. Strict Conditionals. Variably Strict Conditionals. The Limit Assumption. 'Might' Counterfactuals and Outer Modalities. Impossible Antecedents. True Antecedents. Counterfactual Fallacies. Potentialities. 2. Reformulations. Multiple Modalities. Propositional Quantifiers. Comparative Similarity. Similarity Measures. Comparative Possibility. Cotenability. Selection Functions. The Selection Operator. 3. Comparisons. The Metalinguistic Theory: Implicit Premisis. The Metalinguistic Theory: Factual Premises. The Metalinguistic Theory: Laws of Nature. Stalnaker's Theory. 4. Foundations. Possible Worlds. Similarity. 5. Analogies. Conditional Obligation. 'When Next' and 'When Last'. Contextually Definite Descriptions. 6. Logics. Completeness Results. Decidability Results. Derived Modal Logics. Appendix: Related Writings by David Lewis. Index.

Read more less

Book SynopsisCan quite different values be rationally weighed against one another? Can the value of one thing always be ranked as greater than, equal to, or less than the value of something else? If not, when do we find commensurability and comparability unavailable? What are the moral and legal implications? In this book, philosophers address these questions.Trade Review[Incommensurability, Incomparablility, and Practical Reason] is not only an extraordinary collection of all-stars, it contains original papers by just about all the all-stars that have been most insightful in helping us think about issues of incommensurability...Everyone with a real interest in incommensurability must closely study this book. -- David Sobel * Philosophical Quarterly *Table of ContentsIncommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reasoning: An Introduction by Ruth Chang Incommensurability: What's the Problem by James Griffin Incommensurability: Four Proposals by David Wiggins Is Incommensurability Vagueness? by John Broome Practical Reason and Incommensurable Goods by Elizabeth Anderson Incommensurability and Agency by Joseph Raz Comparability, Value, and Choice by Donald Regan Incommensurability and Practical Reasoning by Elijah Millgram Comparing the Incomparable: Tradeoffs and Sacrifices by Steven Lukes Abstract and Concrete Value: Plurality, Conflict, and Maximization by Michael Stocker Leading a Life by Charles Taylor Commensuration and Public Reason by John Finnis Incommensurability and Kinds of Valuation: Some Applications in Law by Cass Sunstein

Read more less

Book SynopsisEverywhere we look in contemporary culture, knowingness has taken the place of thought. This book is a spirited assault on that deadening trend, especially as it affects our deepest attempts to understand the human psyche—in philosophy and psychoanalysis.Trade ReviewOur capacity to mean more than we say is the common thread of all the essays here, which explore philosophically the phenomenon of transference in psychotherapy, the nature of the unconscious mind and the role of Eros in Freud's thinking… In the chapter 'Knowingness and Abandonment: An Oedipus for Our Time,' Mr. Lear reinterprets Sophocles's Oedipus Tyrannus…[arguing] that Oedipus's flaw was to have understood the Delphic oracle too easily, to have assumed that 'meaning is transparent to human reason' and to have ignored 'unconscious meaning'… Mr. Lear offers similarly astute and original readings of Aristotle's Poetics, Plato's Symposium and Republic and Wittgenstein's Philosophical Investigations. He feels free to range so widely because he sees the work of these writers as related; each in its own way was 'working out the logic of the soul.' Each knew 'that one of the most important truths about us is that we have the capacity to be open minded: the capacity to live nondefensively with the question of how to live'… The critical essays will prove of value to anyone seriously engaged by literature. And the chapters on Freud and Oedipus are worth the price of admission alone… Mr. Lear concludes [that] 'What matters, as Freud himself well understood, is what we are able to do with the meanings we make'… These essays prompt us to examine those meanings, which activity, as Plato famously said, is what makes life worth living. -- Christopher Lehmann-Haupt * New York Times *Jonathan Lear explores what is at stake in our willingness to submit to inquiry, and the danger in positing that we already know the end of an inquiry… Lear masterfully chronicles the most basic claim of psychoanalysis: human behavior is an activity that is meaning-seeking and meaning-forming… Throughout Open Minded Lear presents his reader with a textured reading of familiar figures. In connecting the fields of philosophy and psychoanalysis, Lear does more than ask us to see these disciplines as coincidental in their modes of inquiry… Lear leaves his readers with a finely crafted example of that activity. -- Jeannie Ridings * JPCS: Journal for the Psychoanalysis of Culture and Society *[This] collection of essays on psychoanalysis and philosophy…demonstrates the compatibilities between philosophy at its best and Freud's psychoanalysis, and argues for the continuing cultural need for Freud's influence… [Lear] is singularly well suited for the defense of Freud. He is deeply versed in the major works of Western philosophy and knows Freud in and out. As an active therapist he can refer to the exigencies of actual analyses to buttress, and refine, his points. More than that, Lear is a fine writer, clear, rigorous, good-humored, in command of a humane irony. Lear's essay proceeds in the spirit of Freud's own best work. It is shot through with common sense, while also being remarkably provocative… Lear sees deeply into the current war over Freud, much more so than Freud's programmatic attackers… The kind of writing that [he] offers…[is] forceful, original, questing and open, [and] far from standard academic prose… Open Minded is a remarkable book—highly articulate, learned, thoughtful and fresh… Jonathan Lear is one of the most independent and perceptive analysts of contemporary intellectual culture currently at work. -- Mark Edmundson * New York Times Book Review *Philosopher and psychoanalyst Jonathan Lear [believes that] Freud's work, however flawed, still affords the best map to our layered, often irrational mental landscape. In his new book, Open Minded, he offers a rousing defense of Freud, discarding the egregious errors like penis envy and castration complex, while reassessing Freud's broader conception of the unconscious as a repository of repressed meaning. 'There's been a tremendous need to trim the sails in the claims of what psychoanalysis can do,' he admits. But still, 'when we see the irrational behavior of Lewinsky and Clinton and Starr, we want to know not what their serotonin levels were or what evolutionary imperative they were following. We want to know what was going through their minds.' For this, he argues, we still rely on Freud. Without him, after all, a cigar would be just a cigar. -- John Leland and Claudia Kalb * Newsweek *Whatever one may think of its transcendental claims for psychoanalysis in particular, this is certainly an important book, drawing together classical and modern philosophy in support of a view of the mind that has been excluded from contemporary psychology. Of course, no philosophical system can succeed unquestionably in an attempt to justify itself. But if the nature of Mr. Lear's claims makes him vulnerable, this also demonstrates his point: It's only by being open to question that a system of philosophy can stay alive. So bring on the critics. Jonathan Lear is waiting to meet them. -- Matthew Belmonte * Washington Times *These essays reveal Lear to be counterintuitive, playful, empathetic—oh, yes, and funny too. He may be the world's perfect analyst… Lear reminds us that Freud's great achievement was to locate meaning and conflict squarely within the human psyche, rather than in the realm of what the ancients called fate and the religious call divine. -- Susie Linfield * Los Angeles Times *A wise defense of Freud by a psychoanalyst and philosopher who argues that without Freud's insights, citizens in a democratic polity are apt to believe that whatever they think and whatever they want make some kind of rational sense. * New York Times Book Review *Both a philosopher and a psychoanalyst, Jonathan Lear has an exploratory conversational turn of mind… In the course of 300 pages, he has moved you from the hostile vision of psychoanalysis which he confronts at the outset—that it is, after all, a waste of money better spent on Prozac—to a prospect of fertile ground, so immediate that you feel you can reach down and touch it. Set side by side, you discover anew, [that] psychoanalysis and the philosophy of mind stand in a relation to one another which is inherently bountiful. -- Liam Hudson * Times Literary Supplement *It is through his consistent challenging of our taken-for-granted views of the world that Lear holds true to his book's title. In our explorations of consciousness, how easy is it to fall prey to the assumptions of knowingness that subtly preclude open mindedness? How often are we willing to challenge our fundamental assumptions in order to be open to the possibility of learning something truly unknown to us? Lear shows us how being open minded can lead to asking new questions that open up new possibilities for understanding. -- Jonathan Reams * Journal of Consciousness Studies *This is a rich, imaginative and subtle book. It has an intricate structure, and though clearly written it requires concentration to read. Lear is a philosopher writing on psycho-analysis from inside, himself being a practising psycho-analyst. He also brings his insight, as a psycho-analyst, to bear on the philosophy he discusses. The parallels he sees and develops between different philosophers, between philosophers and psycho-analysts, what he has to say about Sophocles' Oedipus, about Freud and modernity's response to his ideas, about Plato's Republic and Symposium, about Wittgenstein and Kant make this book interesting and well worth reading. -- Ilham Dilman * Philosophical Investigations *Based upon a fresh understanding of the Freudian unconscious, Lear presents a startling, new, and profound view of human nature and society, which allows him to move between the intrapsychic and the 'object' world in just the way we have desperately needed. It explains the therapeutic action of psychoanalysis in a clinically convincing fashion. It solves the riddle of what is new and what is old in the transference, and how the two are mediated. It makes practical use of Freud's larger, frequently dismissed, metapsychological hypothesis. Most exciting of all, it stands along as a Freudian alternative to what has come to be known as 'the social construction of reality,' doing equal justice to the public and the private, and showing how Man's creativity implies its own tragic, biological and psychoanalytic constraints. As sophisticated philosophically as it is psychoanalytically, this book offers analysts an extremely rare opportunity to see their concerns in the light of the great philosophical tradition rather than simply as challenged by momentary philosophical fashions (though the recent 'linguistic turn' is also incorporated in Lear's broad sweep.) It is a revelation to watch Lear bring out the psychoanalytically relevant meaning of the classics. Lear's combined macroscopic and microscopic portrait of Man is in the great tradition of Loewald and Ricoeur. -- Lawrence Friedman, M.D., Cornell University Medical CollegeJonathan Lear seeks—through rich and imaginative readings not only of ancient tragedy but also of Plato, Aristotle, Wittgenstein, and Freud—to restore the soul, and with it life, to contemporary philosophy and psychology. -- Jennifer Whiting, Department of Philosophy, Cornell UniversityImagine a dialogue between Freud and Sophocles, and then add Plato, Aristotle, Kant, Wittgenstein, and Loewald. It is wondrous to imagine, but it wouldn't work. They could not understand each other, their theories are based on different assumptions, they start by asking different questions, and they often seem to be talking at cross purposes. But then add Jonathan Lear, a philosopher and psychoanalyst who is familiar with each of them, has studied their ideas, can understand and challenge their conclusions, and can identify the themes that reverberate through their work. Even more, he is someone who can explain to us as he translates for them, and can allow us to join and participate in this remarkable dialogue. We will learn about Oedipus and the contemporary critics of psychoanalysis, who alike in that they need to know so desperately that they cannot tolerate discovering. We will discuss whether love is essential for personal growth, is its greatest obstacle, or both. We will explore what Aristotle meant by catharsis, why Plato discusses both the individual and the state in The Republic, and how psychoanalysis helps us to understand each of these. Most of all, we will be infected by Lear's delight in wonder, in learning and in thinking, and will taste the joyous fascination that comes from the study of questions that link the mind and the soul. This book will bring pleasure to anyone who loves to think and to look again at what they thought they already knew. -- Robert Michels, M.D., Walsh McDermott University Professor of Medicine and Psychiatry at Cornell University Medical College and Training and Supervising Analyst at the Columbia University Center for Psychoanalytic Training and ResearchJonathan Lear persuasively brings together aspects of Plato, Freud, and Wittgenstein in showing how they sometimes work together in illuminating the psyche. Open Minded is a lucid and humane blend of philosophy and psychoanalysis, learned and perceptive. At a time when Freud is besieged by ignorant armies, Lear's work helps to remind us how absurd it is to undervalue the greatest moral essayist of our century, the era's Montaigne. -- Harold BloomAn understanding, it has been said, is a place where the mind comes to rest. In this remarkable exciting and incisive book, Jonathan Lear confronts accepted understandings of how a mind works, observes that 'we have been living on a restricted diet of questions,' and teases into the open the restlessness at the core of a soul. His passion for inquiry plus his lively style pull the reader into the midst of a thoughtful discussion with Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, Freud, and Wittgenstein, an engaging debate which Lear not only brilliantly and lucidly moderates but to which he offers his own original contributions. Indeed, his consideration of Oedipus—man, myth, drama, and complex—is wise enough to integrate the irony of Sophocles' theme of fate's dire inevitability with Freud's recognition of an individual's unconscious responsibility and broad enough to expose the farce that accompanies the tragedy. How uncommon and how pleasing to open a volume and find oneself engaged in a conversation. For Lear is a professor of philosophy, practitioner of psychoanalysis, exemplar of clear thinking, and master of lucid writing. He has given us a volume rare for its genre, one which we regret coming to an end. -- Warren S. Poland, M.D.When this book's second chapter—a defense of psychoanalysis against its recent critics—appeared in The New Republic in 1995, there was an almost audible sigh of relief among those who had found the attacks preposterous, but had figured out no way to answer them. Jonathan Lear's brilliant examination of the radical character of psychoanalysis provided the answer required. Since his essay appeared, talk about 'the death of psychoanalysis' has noticeably subsided. -- Janet MalcolmJonathan Lear is a superb writer. By playing back and forth between discussions of Plato, Aristotle, classic tragedy, on the one hand, Freud and the psychoanalytic process on the other, Lear has said some of the most illuminating things I have read about a number of the most difficult topics in psychoanalysis—the nature of transference, why it has the central role it does in the process of change and therapy, the relation between the public (the public language and world that analyst and patient share) and the private (the patient's idiolect, her peculiar associative web, her unconscious fantasies). -- Marcia Cavell, Department of Philosophy, University of California, BerkeleyTable of ContentsPreface: The King and I On Killing Freud (Again) Knowingness and Abandonment: An Oedipus for Our Time An Interpretation of Transference Restlessness, Phantasy, and the Concept of Mind The Introduction of Eros: Reflections on the Work of Hans Loewald Eros and Unknowing: The Psychoanalytic Significance of Plato's Symposium Testing the Limits: The Place of Tragedy in Aristotle's Ethics Catharsis Inside and outside the Republic Transcendental Anthropology The Disappearing We Notes Acknowledgments Index

Read more less

Book SynopsisIn these selected essays, Charles Parsons surveys the contributions of philosophers and mathematicians who shaped the philosophy of mathematics over the past century: Brouwer, Hilbert, Bernays, Weyl, Gödel, Russell, Quine, Putnam, Wang, and Tait.Trade ReviewParsons is a much admired and highly respected philosopher of mathematics and logic, well-known for his thoughtful and careful reflections on both the great historical figures and on work of the previous century. He is also an astute commentator on the current literature, engaging the contemporary debates and offering illuminating insights about its content and direction. This volume offers a unique opportunity for those not fortunate enough to have attended classes of Parsons’s to form some idea of what such an experience would be like. -- William Demopoulos, University of Western OntarioThis is a truly superb book. Parsons is quite possibly the most distinguished writer on philosophy of mathematics now working and certainly the most careful and probing. These essays examine a rather wide range of historical opinion on mathematical matters, both with an eye to demanding more careful interpretations and formulations from important writers such as Kant or Gödel while remaining sympathetic to their overall philosophical ambitions. Parsons’s treatments are unsurpassed. -- Mark Wilson, University of Pittsburgh

Read more less

Book SynopsisSelected Logic Papers, long out of print and now reissued with eight additional essays, includes much of the author's important work on mathematical logic and the philosophy of mathematics from the past sixty years.Trade Review[Quine] is at once the most elegant expounder of systematic logic in the older, pre-Gödelian style of Frege and Russell, the most distinguished American recruit to logical empiricism, probably the contemporary American philosopher most admired in the profession, and an original philosophical thinker of the first rank… This is an amazing feat of condensation with something solid to say in its brief scope about every major topic of interest in modern formal logic. * New York Review of Books *What [Quine] is expert in is, of course, logic… What [this book offers] is a view of the expert at work. Selected Logic Papers shows him actually doing logic… Logic is not a guide to life, but then Quine has never maintained that it was. It is a powerful adjunct to empirical inquiry, whose proper use requires prior discipline; its virtue lies in the fact that if we supply it with truth, it will never yield falsehood. Few have shown the manner of its use with more authority. * Partisan Review *This book is of continuing, not just historical interest. Quine is the greatest American philosopher of the twentieth century. His work in logic is inseparable from his work in other parts of philosophy. -- George Boolos, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyTable of ContentsWhitehead and the Rise of Modern Logic (1941); Logic, Symbolic (1954); A Method of Generating Part of Arithmetic Without Use of Intuitive Logic (1934); Definition of Substitution (1936); Concatenation as a Basis for Arithmetic (1946); Set-theoretic Foundations for Logic (1936); Logic Based on Inclusion and Abstraction (1937); On Ordered Pairs and Relations (1945-46); On w-Inconsistency and a So-called Axiom of Infinity (1952); Element and Number (1941); On an Application of Tarski's Theory of Truth (1952); On Frege's Way Out (1954); Completeness of the Propositional Calculus (1937); On Cores and Prime Implicants of Truth Functions (1958); Two Theorems about Truth Functions (1951); On Boolean Functions (1949); On the Logic of Quantification (1945); A Proof Procedure for Quantification Theory (1954); Interpretations of Sets of Conditions (1953); Church's Theorem on the Decision Problem (1954); Quantification and the Empty Domain (1953); Reduction to a Dyadic Predicate (1953); Variables Explained Away (1960); Truth, Paradox, and Godel's Theorem (1992); Immanence and Validity (1991); MacHale on Boole (1985); Peirce's Logic (1989); Peano as Logician (1982); Free Logic, Description, and Virtual Classes (1994); The Inception of "New Foundations" (1987); Pythagorean Triples and Fermat's Last Theorem (1992).

Read more less

a huge range and FREE tracked UK delivery on ALL orders.

Read more less

Book SynopsisIn this book, the author introduces classical logic alongside constructive, relevant, comparative, and other nonclassical logics. It begins with brief introductions to informal set theory and general topology, and avoids advanced algebra; thus it is self-contained and suitable for readers with little background in mathematics.Trade Review"We warmly welcome this book as an example of how the mathematical way of thinking can be made available and pleasant to a large group of students."--Solomon Marcus, Zentralblatt MATHTable of ContentsA Preliminaries 1 Chapter 1: Introduction for teachers 3 Purpose and intended audience, 3 Topics in the book, 6 Why pluralism?, 13 Feedback, 18 Acknowledgments, 19 Chapter 2: Introduction for students 20 Who should study logic?, 20 Formalism and certication, 25 Language and levels, 34 Semantics and syntactics, 39 Historical perspective, 49 Pluralism, 57 Jarden's example (optional), 63 Chapter 3: Informal set theory 65 Sets and their members, 68 Russell's paradox, 77 Subsets, 79 Functions, 84 The Axiom of Choice (optional), 92 Operations on sets, 94 Venn diagrams, 102 Syllogisms (optional), 111 Infinite sets (postponable), 116 Chapter 4: Topologies and interiors (postponable) 126 Topologies, 127 Interiors, 133 Generated topologies and finite topologies (optional), 139 Chapter 5: English and informal classical logic 146 Language and bias, 146 Parts of speech, 150 Semantic values, 151 Disjunction (or), 152 Conjunction (and), 155 Negation (not), 156 Material implication, 161 Cotenability, fusion, and constants (postponable), 170 Methods of proof, 174 Working backwards, 177 Quantifiers, 183 Induction, 195 Induction examples (optional), 199 Chapter 6: Definition of a formal language 206 The alphabet, 206 The grammar, 210 Removing parentheses, 215 Defined symbols, 219 Prefix notation (optional), 220 Variable sharing, 221 Formula schemes, 222 Order preserving or reversing subformulas (postponable), 228 B Semantics 233 Chapter 7: Definitions for semantics 235 Interpretations, 235 Functional interpretations, 237 Tautology and truth preservation, 240 Chapter 8: Numerically valued interpretations 245 The two-valued interpretation, 245 Fuzzy interpretations, 251 Two integer-valued interpretations, 258 More about comparative logic, 262 More about Sugihara's interpretation, 263 Chapter 9: Set-valued interpretations 269 Powerset interpretations, 269 Hexagon interpretation (optional), 272 The crystal interpretation, 273 Church's diamond (optional), 277 Chapter 10: Topological semantics (postponable) 281 Topological interpretations, 281 Examples, 282 Common tautologies, 285 Nonredundancy of symbols, 286 Variable sharing, 289 Adequacy of finite topologies (optional), 290 Disjunction property (optional), 293 Chapter 11: More advanced topics in semantics 295 Common tautologies, 295 Images of interpretations, 301 Dugundji formulas, 307 C Basic syntactics 311 Chapter 12: Inference systems 313 Chapter 13: Basic implication 318 Assumptions of basic implication, 319 A few easy derivations, 320 Lemmaless expansions, 326 Detachmental corollaries, 330 Iterated implication (postponable), 332 Chapter 14: Basic logic 336 Further assumptions, 336 Basic positive logic, 339 Basic negation, 341 Substitution principles, 343 D One-formula extensions 349 Chapter 15: Contraction 351 Weak contraction, 351 Contraction, 355 Chapter 16: Expansion and positive paradox 357 Expansion and mingle, 357 Positive paradox (strong expansion), 359 Further consequences of positive paradox, 362 Chapter 17: Explosion 365 Chapter 18: Fusion 369 Chapter 19: Not-elimination 372 Not-elimination and contrapositives, 372 Interchangeability results, 373 Miscellaneous consequences of not-elimination, 375 Chapter 20: Relativity 377 E Soundness and major logics 381 Chapter 21: Soundness 383 Chapter 22: Constructive axioms: avoiding not-elimination 385 Constructive implication, 386 Herbrand-Tarski Deduction Principle, 387 Basic logic revisited, 393 Soundness, 397 Nonconstructive axioms and classical logic, 399 Glivenko's Principle, 402 Chapter 23: Relevant axioms: avoiding expansion 405 Some syntactic results, 405 Relevant deduction principle (optional), 407 Soundness, 408 Mingle: slightly irrelevant, 411 Positive paradox and classical logic, 415 Chapter 24: Fuzzy axioms: avoiding contraction 417 Axioms, 417 Meredith's chain proof, 419 Additional notations, 421 Wajsberg logic, 422 Deduction principle for Wajsberg logic, 426 Chapter 25: Classical logic 430 Axioms, 430 Soundness results, 431 Independence of axioms, 431 Chapter 26: Abelian logic 437 F Advanced results 441 Chapter 27: Harrop's principle for constructive logic 443 Meyer's valuation, 443 Harrop's principle, 448 The disjunction property, 451 Admissibility, 451 Results in other logics, 452 Chapter 28: Multiple worlds for implications 454 Multiple worlds, 454 Implication models, 458 Soundness, 460 Canonical models, 461 Completeness, 464 Chapter 29: Completeness via maximality 466 Maximal unproving sets, 466 Classical logic, 470 Wajsberg logic, 477 Constructive logic, 479 Non-finitely-axiomatizable logics, 485 References 487 Symbol list 493 Index 495

Read more less

Book SynopsisTrade Review"A Choice Outstanding Academic Title of the Year""Irrationality is . . . stippled with fascinating meditations and vignettes."---Kwame Anthony Appiah, New York Review of Books"Irrationality is unique among recent paeans to Enlightenment and liberalism in marrying a resolute defence of reason with a recognition of how futile such defences tend to be. As Smith expertly reveals, wherever one looks in the history of Western philosophy, rationality is haunted and teased by its other."---William Davies, London Review of Books"Smith is an excellent dramatizer of this dialectic, a witty and provocative guide leading the reader through chapters on logic . . . pseudoscience . . . and death . . . with a distinctive voice and considerable wit."---Jonathan Egid, Times Literary Supplement

Read more less

Book Synopsis

Read more less

Book SynopsisTrade Review"Fascinating. . . . Part philosophy, part maths, part activity book; Games for Your Mind is an ingenious thing."---Amy Barrett, BBC Science Focus"Excellent."---Elizabeth Palmer, Christian Century"It’s a serious and at times technical book, specifically about logic puzzles, though beneath its concern with matters such as obversion and epistemic obligations it has an unexpected jauntiness."---Henry Hitchings, Times Literary Supplement"Jason Rosenhouse’s Games for Your Mind is an engaging popular mathematics book written to enlighten the reader on the mathematics and logic behind popular puzzles. . . .overall, the reviewer would recommend this book to all people who want a puzzling challenge. Although the puzzles towards the end of the book feel impossible, the thrill of that ‘ah!’ moment when you work through Rosenhouse’s solution is surely a high for any mathematician out there."---Holly A. J. Middleton-Spencer, London Mathematical Society

Read more less

Book SynopsisWe talk about irrationality when behaviour defies explanation or prediction, when decisions are driven by emotions or instinct rather than by reflection, when reasoning fails to conform to basic principles of logic and probability, and when beliefs lack coherence or empirical support.Trade ReviewA welcome and timely addition to the philosophical and pedagogical literature. The book’s clarity of organization, scope of detail, and insights into the nature and liability of irrationality make this not only an excellent guide, but a first-rate book-length treatment of the subject. George Graham, Georgia State University Employing striking every day and literary examples, Lisa Bortolotti surveys live cross-disciplinary debates about the role of rational thought in mental health, decision-making, and expertise. Philosophers and psychologists are increasingly suspicious of the old dreams of reason, casting doubt on deliberation and analysis as effective guides to life. Bortolotti effectively demonstrates the complexity of relations between reflection and intuition, and points the way towards more dynamic conceptions of intelligent thought. John Sutton, Macquarie UniversityTable of ContentsPREFACECHAPTER 1: BEHAVIOUR DEFYING INTERPRETATIONCHAPTER 2: BEHAVIOUR ATTRACTING A PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSISCHAPTER 3: UNREFLECTIVE CHOICESCHAPTER 4: BELIEFS UNCONSTRAINED BY EVIDENCEIRRATIONALITY: STILL A USEFUL CONCEPT?BIBLIOGRAPHY

Read more less

Book SynopsisWe talk about irrationality when behaviour defies explanation or prediction, when decisions are driven by emotions or instinct rather than by reflection, when reasoning fails to conform to basic principles of logic and probability, and when beliefs lack coherence or empirical support.Table of ContentsPREFACECHAPTER 1: BEHAVIOUR DEFYING INTERPRETATIONCHAPTER 2: BEHAVIOUR ATTRACTING A PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSISCHAPTER 3: UNREFLECTIVE CHOICESCHAPTER 4: BELIEFS UNCONSTRAINED BY EVIDENCEIRRATIONALITY: STILL A USEFUL CONCEPT?BIBLIOGRAPHY

Read more less

Book SynopsisSaul Kripke has been a major influence on analytic philosophy and allied fields for a half-century and more. His early masterpiece, Naming and Necessity, reversed the pattern of two centuries of philosophizing about the necessary and the contingent.Trade Review"With characteristic verve and clarity, Burgess succeeds in doing what many thought impossible: presenting the best of Kripke's philosophical and technical work in a precise, readable, and highly illuminating fashion. Every philosopher should read this." Stephen Neale, City University of New York "Destined to become a classic, this is the best systematic overview of Saul Kripke’s major contributions to philosophy. While each chapter and appendix provides an excellent introduction for those new to the material, old hands will relish Burgess’s provocative takes on Kripkean views of belief, rule-following, and the mind. The explanation of the connection between Kripke’s technical and philosophical work on truth and modality is masterful." Scott Soames, University of Southern California "Burgess provides a masterful introduction to Kripke’s philosophy, but this volume is more than that; it is a first-rate piece of philosophy in its own right, as one would expect from one of the leading philosophers of mathematics in the world." Mark Steiner, Hebrew University of JerusalemTable of ContentsPreface page vii Acknowledgments x Introduction 1 Background 2 Plan 7 1 Naming 11 Mill vs Frege 11 Error and Ignorance 19 Metalinguistic Theories 24 The Historical Chain Picture 28 Reference vs Attribution 33 2 Identity 37 Modal Logic and its Archenemy 37 Rigidity 45 The Necessity of Identity 50 Resistance 53 The Contingent a Priori 56 3 Necessity 59 Imagination and the Necessary a Posteriori 59 Natural Substances 64 Natural Kinds 69 Natural Phenomena and Natural Law 71 The Mystery of Modality 74 4 Belief 78 Direct Reference 78 Puzzling Pierre 83 Poles Apart 88 Counterfactual Attitudes 91 Empty Names 98 5 Rules 104 Conventionalism 105 Kripkenstein 108 The Analogy with Hume 110 The Skeptical Paradox 116 The Skeptical Solution 120 6 Mind 128 Physicalism 128 Functionalism 131 Against Functionalism 134 Against Physicalism 136 The Mystery of Mentality 140 Appendix A Models 143 The Logic of Modality 143 Kripke Models 147 The Curse of the Barcan Formulas 150 Controversy and Confusion 153 Appendix B Truth 157 Paradox and Pathology 158 Kripke vs Tarski 159 Fixed Points 165 The Intuitive Notion of Truth 170 Notes 175 Bibliography 204 Index 211

Read more less

Book SynopsisSaul Kripke has been a major influence on analytic philosophy and allied fields for a half-century and more. His early masterpiece, Naming and Necessity, reversed the pattern of two centuries of philosophizing about the necessary and the contingent.Trade Review"With characteristic verve and clarity, Burgess succeeds in doing what many thought impossible: presenting the best of Kripke's philosophical and technical work in a precise, readable, and highly illuminating fashion. Every philosopher should read this." Stephen Neale, City University of New York "Destined to become a classic, this is the best systematic overview of Saul Kripke’s major contributions to philosophy. While each chapter and appendix provides an excellent introduction for those new to the material, old hands will relish Burgess’s provocative takes on Kripkean views of belief, rule-following, and the mind. The explanation of the connection between Kripke’s technical and philosophical work on truth and modality is masterful." Scott Soames, University of Southern California "Burgess provides a masterful introduction to Kripke’s philosophy, but this volume is more than that; it is a first-rate piece of philosophy in its own right, as one would expect from one of the leading philosophers of mathematics in the world." Mark Steiner, Hebrew University of JerusalemTable of ContentsPreface page vii Acknowledgments x Introduction 1 Background 2 Plan 7 1 Naming 11 Mill vs Frege 11 Error and Ignorance 19 Metalinguistic Theories 24 The Historical Chain Picture 28 Reference vs Attribution 33 2 Identity 37 Modal Logic and its Archenemy 37 Rigidity 45 The Necessity of Identity 50 Resistance 53 The Contingent a Priori 56 3 Necessity 59 Imagination and the Necessary a Posteriori 59 Natural Substances 64 Natural Kinds 69 Natural Phenomena and Natural Law 71 The Mystery of Modality 74 4 Belief 78 Direct Reference 78 Puzzling Pierre 83 Poles Apart 88 Counterfactual Attitudes 91 Empty Names 98 5 Rules 104 Conventionalism 105 Kripkenstein 108 The Analogy with Hume 110 The Skeptical Paradox 116 The Skeptical Solution 120 6 Mind 128 Physicalism 128 Functionalism 131 Against Functionalism 134 Against Physicalism 136 The Mystery of Mentality 140 Appendix A Models 143 The Logic of Modality 143 Kripke Models 147 The Curse of the Barcan Formulas 150 Controversy and Confusion 153 Appendix B Truth 157 Paradox and Pathology 158 Kripke vs Tarski 159 Fixed Points 165 The Intuitive Notion of Truth 170 Notes 175 Bibliography 204 Index 211

Read more less

Book SynopsisRegardless of who you are or how you live your life, you disagree with millions of people on an enormous number of topics from politics, religion and morality to sport, culture and art.Trade Review"A fine introduction to the issues surrounding disagreement, this text will engage students with its lively prose and lucid thought."Ernest Sosa, Rutgers University"Frances's commitment to working with realistic examples makes for a kind of contact with everyday intellectual life that can seem missing in much of the professional literature on disagreement. Although the book is designed for students, it also gave me new things to think about."David Christensen, Brown UniversityTable of ContentsList of Stories Introduction Part 1: Basics of Disagreement 1. Genuine vs. Illusory Disagreement 2. Easier Questions about Disagreement 3. Harder Questions about Disagreement 4. Expert Testimony and Higher-Order Evidence 5. Peers, Inferiors, and Superiors 6. Some Results 7. The Peer Rule and the Superior Rule 8. Disagreement over Facts, Values, And Religion 9. Disagreement over Beliefs vs. Actions 10. What We Should Believe vs. What We Actually Believe 11. Response to Disagreement vs. Subsequent Level Of Confidence 12. What It Means To Realize Disagreement 13. The Disagreement Question Refined 14. Disagreement with One vs. Disagreement with Many 15. Some More Results 16. Study Questions and Problems Part 2: Conciliatory or Steadfast? 1. Introduction 2. Revising the Three Rules Of Thumb 3. Rethinking Judgments about Peers And Superiors 4. More Revision: Confidence Level vs. Evidence Level 5. When You Have No Idea Who is in the Better Position 6. Split Experts 7. Special Case: Religious Belief 8. Some Results 9. Questions on Uniqueness, Independence, and Peerhood Uniqueness Independence Conditional Peers and Superiors Feldman’s Questions 10. Does Disagreement Lead To Skepticism? 11. The Disagreement Question Revisited 12. Study Questions and Problems Index

Read more less

Book SynopsisThe Nature of God explores a perennial problem in the philosophy of religion. Drawing upon developments in philosophy, most notably those in philosophical logic, Edward R. Wierenga examines the traditional divine attributes of omnipotence...Trade ReviewThere is a fascinating and ongoing debate among analytic philosophers concerning the attributes of God and the relationship between God and the world. The discussion uses the tools of contemporary logic... to clarify and, hopefully, settle these issues. Wierenga's book is a substantial contribution to that debate.... It provides an overview of the twists and turns of contemporary discussion. * Journal of the American Academy of Religion *

Read more less

Book SynopsisIn Ciceronis Topica and De topicis differentiis are Boethius's two treatises on Topics (loci). Together these two works present Boethius's theory of the art of discovering arguments, a theory...

Read more less

Book SynopsisThis treatment of critical thinking theories, old and modern, addresses related concerns expressed by feminists and postmodernists. The author suggests a solution by way of a feminist redescription of critical thinking as constructive thinking, which she relates to classroom settings.

Read more less

Book SynopsisTrade ReviewBrock's treatment of Aquinas's account of action exhibits a rare combination of rigor and learning. It is, no doubt, the best we have.""- Thomist;""Both Thomistic scholars and analytic phi- losophers interested in theories of human action and accountability will find this book a welcome addi- tion to their libraries. Truly a substantive addition to both Thomistic scholarship and the ongoing analytic investigation into human action and responsible agency.""- American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly;""A first-rate book...Brock's lucid and illuminating analysis offers much of value to both intellecutal historians and theologians, as well as philosophers.""- Theological Studies;""A tremendously successful exposition of Aquinas, which brings him into conversation with contemporary and analytic philosophy in a mutually illuminating way. Action and Conduct is so thorough and so lucid that no students of Aquinas or of contemporary action theory can afford to neglect it.""- Modern Theology

Read more less

Book SynopsisPresents a normative framework for identifying and evaluating ad hominem or personal attack arguments.Trade ReviewWalton's own careful categorization and formalization of the various kinds of ad hominem arguments brings clarity to the subject.... Walton's book can be recommended for its plethora of interesting examples, its historically informed discussion, and its useful typology of ad hominem arguments. - The Midwest Quarterly ""Quite accessible to the interested general reader... Walton's books are intelligent, perceptive commentaries on aspects of common argumentative practice.... We see in Walton a hugely impressive example of the necessity of disciplined observation as a necessary condition of a scientifically tenable understanding of the matters at hand.... At the level of 'models of the data,' there is nothing in the literature that surpasses Ad Hominem Arguments. Walton has done us the service of publishing a book that is necessary reading."" - Argumentation

Read more less

Book SynopsisThis book examines three areas in which abductive reasoning is especially important: medicine, science, and law. The reader is introduced to abduction and shown how it has evolved historically into the framework of conventional wisdom in logic. Discussions draw upon recent techniques used in artificial intelligence, particularly in the areas of multi-agent systems and plan recognition, to develop a dialogue model of explanation. Cases of causal explanations in law are analysed using abductive reasoning, and all the components are finally brought together to build a new account of abductive reasoning. By clarifying the notion of abduction as a common and significant type of reasoning in everyday argumentation, Abductive Reasoning will be useful to scholars and students in many fields, including argumentation, computing and artificial intelligence, psychology and cognitive science, law, philosophy, linguistics, and speech communication and rhetoric.

Read more less

Book Synopsis

Read more less

Book Synopsis

Read more less

Book SynopsisConfronted by forces of change, the Supreme Court appeared the bastion of conservatism in case after case, as they defended the old order. Progressive reformers of the time and historians of the 20th century have depicted the era's nine justices as aging reactionaries. Now, in 'Guardians of the Moral Order', Mark Bailey rises to their defence.Trade Review"With convincing detail [Bailey] recounts the concepts, assumptions, tenets, and teachings of antebellum moral science."—Law and History Review "An engaging and well-argued interpretation of the Court, full of intellectual surprises and new insights."—Kermit Hall, Utah State University "A significant contribution to legal history that offers a clear application of nineteenth-century moral philosophy to the work of the Supreme Court."—William LaPiana, New York Law SchoolTable of ContentsTable of Contents List of Tables Introduction 1. American Legal History: The Problem of Ideology, Epistemology, and Typology 2. The Pattern of Antebellum College and Legal Education 3. Moral Philosophy: A Theoretical Science 4. Moral Philosophy: A Practical Science 5. Law and Society in the Context of Providential Design 6. Moral Accountability, the Facultative State, and the Police Power 7. Laissez-faire Constitutionalism and the Moral Economy 8. The Moral Order Endangered Conclusion Appendix I Appendix II Notes Selected Bibliography Index

Read more less

Book SynopsisA COMPANION TO WITTGENSTEIN The most comprehensive survey of Wittgenstein's thought yet compiled, this volume of fifty newly commissioned essays by leading interpreters of his philosophy is a keynote addition to the Blackwell Companions to Philosophy series. Full of penetrating insights into the life and work of the most important philosopher of the twentieth century, the collection explores the full range of Wittgenstein's contribution to philosophy. It includes essays on his intellectual development, his work in logic and mathematics, philosophy of language, philosophy of mind and action, epistemology, ethics, philosophy of religion, and much else. As well as examining Wittgenstein's contribution to human understanding in detail, the Companion features vital contextual analysis that traces the relationship between his ideas and those of other philosophers and schools of thought, including the Aristotelian and continental philosophical traditions. Authors also address prominent theTable of ContentsList of Contributors ix Acknowledgments xiii Wittgenstein’s Published Works in Order of Composition xiv Introduction 1 John Hyman and Hans-Johann Glock Ludwig Wittgenstein: A Sketch of His Life 5 Ray Monk Part I Introductory 21 1. Wittgenstein’s Philosophical Development 23 Wolfgang Kienzler 2. Wittgenstein’s Texts and Style 41 David G. Stern Part II Influences 57 3. Wittgenstein and Schopenhauer 59 Dale Jacquette 4. Wittgenstein and Frege 74 Michael Beaney 5. Wittgenstein and Russell 92 Graham Stevens 6. Wittgenstein, Hertz, and Boltzmann 110 John M. Preston Part III Early Philosophy 125 7. Logical Atomism 127 Leo K.C. Cheung 8. The Picture Theory 141 Colin Johnston 9. Wittgenstein on Solipsism 159 Ernst Michael Lange 10. Resolute Readings of the Tractatus 175 James Conant and Silver Bronzo 11. Ineffability and Nonsense in the Tractatus 195 Leo K.C. Cheung 12. Metaphysics: From Ineffability to Normativity 209 P.M.S. Hacker Part IV Philosophy and Grammar 229 13. Philosophy and Philosophical Method 231 Hans-Johann Glock 14. Grammar and Grammatical Statements 252 Severin Schroeder 15. The Autonomy of Grammar 269 Michael N. Forster 16. Surveyability 278 Joachim Schulte Part V Logic and Mathematics 291 17. Logic and the Tractatus 293 Roger M. White 18. Wittgenstein’s Early Philosophy of Mathematics 305 Pasquale Frascolla 19. Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy of Mathematics 319 A.W. Moore 20. Wittgenstein and Antirealism 332 Mathieu Marion 21. Necessity and Apriority 346 Eric Loomis Part VI Language 359 22. Names and Ostensive Definitions 361 Kai Büttner 23. Meaning and Understanding 375 Jason Bridges 24. Rules and Rule-Following 390 Gary Ebbs 25. Vagueness and Family Resemblance 407 Hanoch Ben-Yami 26. Languages, Language-Games, and Forms of Life 420 Daniel Whiting 27. Wittgenstein on Truth 433 David Dolby Part VII Mind and Action 443 28. Privacy and Private Language 445 Edward Kanterian 29. The Inner and the Outer 465 William Child 30. Wittgenstein on “I” and the Self 478 Maximilian de Gaynesford 31. Wittgenstein on Action and the Will 491 Maria Alvarez 32. Wittgenstein on Intentionality 502 Stefan Brandt 33. Wittgenstein on Seeing Aspects 517 Arif Ahmed 34. Wittgenstein on Color 533 Jonathan Westphal Part VIII Epistemology 545 35. Wittgenstein on Knowledge and Certainty 547 Danièle Moyal-Sharrock 36. Wittgenstein on Skepticism 563 Duncan Pritchard 37. Wittgenstein on Causation and Induction 576 Constantine Sandis and Chon Tejedor 38. Wittgenstein and Philosophy of Science 587 Vasso Kindi Part IX Ethics, Aesthetics, and Religion 603 39. Wittgenstein and Ethics 605 Robert L. Arrington 40. Wittgenstein and Aesthetics 612 Severin Schroeder 41. Wittgenstein and Anthropology 627 Brian R. Clack 42. Wittgenstein and Philosophy of Religion 639 John Cottingham 43. Wittgenstein and Psychoanalysis 651 Edward Harcourt Part X Philosophical Schools and Traditions 667 44. Wittgenstein and the Aristotelian Tradition 669 Roger Pouivet 45. Wittgenstein and Kantianism 682 Robert Hanna 46. Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle 699 Thomas Uebel 47. Wittgenstein and Ordinary Language Philosophy 718 Anita Avramides 48. Wittgenstein and Pragmatism 731 David Bakhurst and Cheryl Misak 49. Wittgenstein and Naturalism 746 Christopher Hookway 50. Wittgenstein and Continental Philosophy 757 Stephen Mulhall Index 771

Read more less