Nursing Books

Book SynopsisTable of Contents1. Introduction to Testing and the NCLEX-RN® Exam 2. Leadership and Management 3. Advanced Clinical Concepts 4. Medical-Surgical Nursing 5. Pediatric Nursing 6. Maternity Nursing 7. Psychiatric Nursing 8. Gerontologic Nursing Appendix A: Normal Values Appendix B: Recommended Daily Requirements and Food Sources Appendix C: Common Laboratory Tests

Read more less

Book SynopsisTable of ContentsCHAPTER 1 Medical, Nursing, and Health Professions Terminology CHAPTER 2 Communication CHAPTER 3 Interprofessional Collaboration and Delegation CHAPTER 4 Clinical Judgment and the Nursing Process CHAPTER 5 Documentation CHAPTER 6 Patient Interview CHAPTER 7 Vital Signs CHAPTER 8 Physical Assessmen CHAPTER 9 Pain Assessment CHAPTER 10 Skin, Hair, and Nail Assessment CHAPTER 11 Head, Eyes, Ears, Nose, and Throat Assessment (HEENT) CHAPTER 12 Respiratory Assessment CHAPTER 13 Cardiac and Peripheral Vascular Assessment CHAPTER 14 Musculoskeletal Assessment CHAPTER 15 Neurological Assessment CHAPTER 16 Abdominal Assessment CHAPTER 17 Breast and Genital Assessment CHAPTER 18 Safety CHAPTER 19 Equivalents and Dosage Calculation CHAPTER 20 Medication Administration CHAPTER 21 Infection Control CHAPTER 22 Mobility and Positioning CHAPTER 23 Personal Care CHAPTER 24 Wound Care CHAPTER 25 Oxygen Administration CHAPTER 26 Nutrition and Diets CHAPTER 27 Diagnostic Testing and Procedures CHAPTER 28 Preoperative and Postoperative Care CHAPTER 29 Emergent Clinical Situations CHAPTER 30 Death and Dying Index

Read more less

Book Synopsis

Read more less

Book SynopsisThe Oxford Handbook of Children's and Young People's Nursing second edition provides concise, practical and expert advice on all aspects of the nurse's role. Written for both practising and student nurses, it is a comprehensive and reliable guide to the care of children and young people in a family context.Trade ReviewReview from previous edition An excellent resource for any nurse that comes into contact with children and young people. For paediatric nurses it is an essential reference that would prove extremely useful both for student and registered nurses. * Journal of Community Nursing *Table of Contents1. Fundamental aspects of children's and young people's nursing ; 2. Legal and professional issues ; 3. Administration of medicines in children's and young people's nursing ; 4. Skin problems and communicable diseases ; 5. Neurological problems ; 6. Respiratory problems ; 7. Cardiovascular problems ; 8. Gastrointestinal problems ; 9. Genito-urinary problems ; 10. Reproductive problems ; 11. Musculo-skeletal problems ; 12. Sensory problems ; 13. Haematology and immunity problems ; 14. Care of children and young people with cancer ; 15. Endocrine and metabolic disorders ; 16. Neonatal problems ; 17. Genetic and congenital problems ; 18. Mental health ; 19. Children and young people with chronic illness / disability ; 20. High dependency and intensive care

Read more less

Book SynopsisIn How to Run Reflective Practice Groups: A Guide for Healthcare Professionals, Arabella Kurtz explores the use of reflective practice in the modern healthcare context. Responding to the rapidly increasing demand for reflective practice groups in healthcare and drawing on her extensive experience as a facilitator and trainer, Kurtz presents a fully developed, eight-stage model: The Intersubjective Model of Reflective Practice Groups. The book offers a guide to the organisation, structure and delivery of group sessions, with useful suggestions for overcoming commonly-encountered problems and promoting empathic relationships with clients and colleagues. Clearly and accessibly written, using full situational examples for each stage of the presented model, How to Run Reflective Practice Groups offers a comprehensive guide to facilitating reflective practice in healthcare.Trade Review"Dr. Kurtz offers an illustrative, comprehensive, and meaningful approach to reflective practice. Learning opportunities abound from reading the rich examples to applying the model to a healthcare setting." - Nicholas Ladany, Dean of the School of Leadership, University of San Diego, USA"Dr Kurtz brings her wealth of clinical expertise and experience to this excellent new book. While it is an eminently practical manual, grounded within NHS culture and steeped in clinical practice, it is also clearly underpinned by the relevant theoretical influences and empirical research. This makes it an important new addition to the field of Reflective Practice, which is long overdue. I wish it had been available to me!" - Delia Cushway, Emeritus Professor of Clinical Psychology, Coventry University, UK"If you want to explore group reflective practice this book is essential reading for nurses and other healthcare professionals. In today’s pressured healthcare environment, reflective practice has never been more important to provide time to think and learn. This book and the Intersubjective Model of Reflective Practice opens up new possibilities." - Dave Clarke, Foundation Professor of Nursing,University of Leicester, UK"Arabella Kurtz makes a compelling case for the place of reflective practice in healthcare settings and in the training of healthcare professionals. She has drawn on her considerable experience as well as theory to produce a clear Intersubjective Model for reflective practice. Each stage of the model is described in separate chapters which provide excellent guidance and examples of what to do as a facilitator. The first stage deals uniquely with the organisational and contractual issues that so often interfere with the establishment and effective running of reflective groups. The remaining stages guide the reader through the essential tasks of reflective groups. If services are to develop a culture of compassionate care then reflective practice should be integral and this book provides a model for how this could be achieved." - Tony Lavender, Emeritus Professor of Clinical Psychology, Canterbury Christ Church University, UK"Reflective practice is increasingly proffered as a panacea to the pressures on healthcare staff of rising clinical demand, financial austerity and a target driven culture, yet it is poorly defined and often difficult to implement. Based on years of working with the lived experience of practitioners in an extensive range of settings, Kurtz has developed a unique, yet widely applicable, intersubjective model of reflective practice integrating experiential, psychoanalytic, and phenomenological approaches. By allowing a space for intuition, emotional responsiveness and creativity to develop, staff groups are facilitated in deepening their understanding of human relationships and finding meaning in their work. This book offers an accessible, practical and much-needed guide to reflective practice which will be relevant to all disciplines working in health and social care services." - Jessica Yakeley, Consultant Psychiatrist in Forensic Psychotherapy and Director of the Portman Clinic, Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust, UKTable of ContentsList of tables DedicationAcknowledgements Note on terms and use of examples from practice 1 Introduction 2 Contracting and Review at the Organisational Level 3 Contracting and Review at the Group Level 4 Turning In 5 Looking Back 6 Generation 7 Free Response 8 MoreEffortful Thinking 9 Turning Out 10 Conclusion Index

Read more less

Book SynopsisThis is the first Nursing book on cancer care designed around a conceptual model of whole person care. Key concepts are stress, healing, resilience and health. As a clinical model, nursing goals, desired outcomes, key concepts and proposed psychosocial interventions with patients and family caregivers, advance the practice of clinical nursing toward a more comprehensive understanding of the whole person with cancer and their loved ones. As a model for teaching nursing students about chronic illness, it provides a scientific basis for students to learn how to assess and care for the whole person and his loved one. As a model for clinical research in the field of cancer care, it serves as a predicate for the development, evaluation and interpretation of clinical interventions. The model is a dynamic framework that both informs and is informed by research findings. It is hoped that future research findings will reveal the optimal combination of interventions to provide comprehensive care across clinical contexts. With a patient-centred humanistic focus anchored by the quality of the nurse patient and family caregiver relationships, it is hoped that the nurse's technical, procedural and medical expertise may complement rather than define the nurse's approach to the whole patient and family. The book is structured to facilitate the reader's easy access to needed information. Each chapter examines a key concept of the model, and is organized around an introduction, learning objectives, definitions, and relevant research findings that serve as the scientific predicate for suggested interventions discussed in Part 4, Nursing approaches. Clinical and personal anecdotes, tables and figures illustrate the concepts under discussion. Nurse practitioners, clinic nurse specialists, nursing professors, graduate students, and nurse researchers may find this book a useful reference for conceptualizing whole person care, and for determining relevant interventions that promote healing, resilience and health. But it is also relevant for family doctors and fourth year students learning to care for the whole person with a chronic illness.Table of ContentsDetailed Table of ContentsPART 1Stress, healing and resilience in the whole person with cancer Chapter 1. Introduction My earliest memories about cancer and healing were derived from a true story my father once told me. He was an ENT surgeon working at an academic hospital in the early 1950s when a curious event concerning one of his patients, occurred. A priest had made an appointment to see my father because of a chronic problem with hoarseness that had befuddled previous doctors. My father located a tumour of the larynx. As per the protocol of the newly established hospital tumour board my father presented the diagnostic evidence, and the board members fully concurred with his diagnosis. A cancer diagnosis was dire in those days, so the evening before the surgery, my father dropped by the priest's hospital room with the nurse-in -charge. The priest was praying, but stopped on seeing his surgeon and the nurse. My father who was not particularly religious, but respectful of the priest's devotion to his faith, asked if they could all pray together, which they did in the priest's room. They were three individuals from different faiths praying to their own higher Being, encompassing the priest with their presence, caring and support. The next morning, my father and the medical residents started the operation. But they soon discovered to their amazement that the tumour had disappeared. It was inexplicable. When I have shared this story with nursing students it has been met, unsurprisingly, with the highest degree of skepticism. A couple of students have had the courage to say what I am sure many others were thinking: that it could be explained away by poor diagnostic tools in those days or medical incompetence! Still, it was equally difficult to dismiss, out of hand, the diagnostic capabilities of a group of surgeons working at an eminent university hospital in Montreal, all members of the Tumour Board, who had arrived at the same conclusion. It was a mystery. Years later, doing research for this book I came across a scientific review of the placebo effect in oncology, now recognized as an innate healing effect, triggered by strongly held cognitive expectations for a positive clinical outcome. Based on WHO criteria, the review reported that the cancer tumours were significantly reduced in about 2.4% or 10 out of 375 patients from 10 trials (Chvetzoff & Tannock, 2003). From a scientific perspective, it was an unimpressive result to be normally discounted out of hand. Yet the finding left open the possibility for the medically inexplicable. Although humans throughout history have been known to heal physical and psychic wounds, it is only recently that medical scientists have come to realize that strongly held human beliefs can trigger innate processes of healing via various physiological pathways such as the reward system, down regulating the stress response system, enabling the re emergence of healing processes that also enhance cell -mediated immunity, a critical anti cancer defense (Colloca & Barsky, 2020; Dutcher & Creswell, 2018). Healing and health in the whole person have been much revered core concepts of the Nursing discipline, since Florence Nightingale's Notes on Nursing, which was published over 100 years ago (Skretkowicz, 2010). Nightingale's scientific observations suggested that distressed patients possessed an innate ability to heal or restore wholeness, when certain environmental conditions, such as uninterrupted sleep, a clean, restful or quiet environment, and a caring and thoughtful approach were implemented. These observations led her to hypothesize that the mind influences physical well being; and conversely, physical health has a significant impact on the mind (Skretkowicz, 2010). Both involved reparative processes within the interactive context of the patient's environment. These mind-body connections laid down the first essential ideas about what constituted the whole person (an integrated mind-body) in relation to stress, health and healing within the discipline of Nursing. Since then Nurse scientists have argued that human beings are more than the sum of their parts, in stanch contrast to a healthcare system mostly shaped by a reductionist perspective in which the clinical focus remains the individual's illness and treatment. Their thinking was also influenced by von Bertalanffy's general systems theory (1973)) and Roger's conceptualization of the human being as an 'irreducible whole', fuelled by homeo-dynamic energy interrelating with the environment' (Malinski 2011, p. 446). Von Bertalanffy (1973) argued that systems are distinguished by non- linear interactions among their constituent parts, which was a prescient idea that has since been supported by research findings that highlight the human's non linear process of biological adjustments in response to environmental stressors (B. S. McEwen, 2007). In other words, the whole person both influences and is influenced by the environment. McGill University's School of Nursing under the leadership of Moyra Allen developed the key concepts of the McGill Model of Nursing. In contrast to prevailing thinking in the 1960s, that health and illness were at opposite ends of the same continuum, the McGill Model envisioned health as co- existing with illness (L. Gottlieb & Rowat, 1987). Influenced by the work of Spiegel (1997) and Bronfenbrenner (1981) health was described in terms of multidimensional developmental processes that grow toward greater complexity and self actualization while maintaining coherence over the life span (L Gottlieb & Gottlieb, 2007).. Around the same time, research in the field of environmental stress and psycho- neuro-endocrine and immune sciences provided scientific legitimacy to Nursing's foundational beliefs about the mind-body relationship, healing and resilience (in terms of both biological as well as psychological processes of adaptation in relation to the environment (e.g.B. McEwen, 2008; B. S. McEwen & Stellar, 1993). McEwen and colleagues built upon earlier landmark research on stress by introducing concepts of allostasis (healthy resilience) to exemplify the adaptive changes that occur in response to stress, and allostatic load (maladaptive changes) to reflect the measurable burden caused by chronic stress on the whole person (McEwen, 2007;McEwen & Stellar, 1993). They advanced knowledge of the whole person through their work on the main biological regulator of stress and the dynamic non -linear networks of biological mediators triggering widespread temporary or prolonged changes to neural structures, pathways and functions throughout the whole being. These stress-induced changes suppress neuro-biological processes (eg the parasympathetic nervous system) associated with regeneration, reparation and restoration (healing) of myriad biological functions including cell mediated immunity, which is vital for promoting long- term health particularly in patients with cancer (Lutgendorf & Andersen, 2015; Lutgendorf, Sood, & Antoni, 2010; Wang et al., 2017). Knowledge of these stress- induced neuro-biological impairments negatively affecting healing and resilient processes have added immeasurably to the clinical context within which resilient- and healing- promoting clinical interventions may be developed and evaluated. These scientific advances underscore the clinical need for an integrated formulation of the whole person based on stress, healing, resilience and related concepts that may be delineated by a conceptual model so that nursing interventions may target relevant unique and overlapping endpoints that promote or protect the individual's resilience and health. This is a clinical imperative in caring for patients with cancer and their family caregiver who must confront diverse stressors along the continuum. Finally I conclude with this last thought: Delineating a substantive body of knowledge that can be leveraged on behalf of patients and loved ones also offers the potential for further levelling of the healthcare playing field within which nursing and medicine continue to exchange biological as well as behavioural perspectives of their shared patients, expressed via the complementary prisms of their respective professions, which together can only benefit the patient and family. Part 1 introduces the Stress, Resilience and Healing Model. Chapter 1 presents the whole person's key concepts of central interest, the desired outcomes and proposed interventions known to enhance healing and resilience. Chapter 2 reviews the different forms of environmental stress; some serve to trigger he development and adaptive capabilities of resilience, others, such as chronically stressful experiences alter neural structures and disrupt signalling pathways and molecular processes that ultimately can drive the development of cancer, its progression, and or a cancer recurrence, particularly in the absence of adequate personal and social resources. ReferencesBenson, Herbert, & Stark, Marg. (1997). Timeless healing : the power and biology of belief. New York: Simon & Schuster.Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. (1973). General system theory : foundations, development, applications. New York: G. Braziller.Bronfenbrenner, Urie. (1981). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, Mass, and London England: Harvard University Press.Chvetzoff, G., & Tannock, I. F. (2003). Placebo effects in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst, 95(1), 19-29. Colloca, L., & Barsky, A. J. (2020). Placebo and Nocebo Effects. N Engl J Med, 382(6), 554-561. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1907805Dutcher, J. M., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). The role of brain reward pathways in stress resilience and health. Neurosci Biobehav Rev, 95, 559-567. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.10.014Gottlieb, L, & Gottlieb, B. (2007). The development/health framework within the McGill Model of Nursing: 'Laws of nature' guiding whole person care. Advances in Nursing Science, 30(1), E43-57. Gottlieb, L. , & Rowat, K. (1987). The McGill Model of Nursing: A practice derived model. Advance in Nursing Science, 9(4), 51-61. Lutgendorf, S. K., & Andersen, B. L. (2015). Biobehavioral approaches to cancer progression and survival: Mechanisms and interventions. Am Psychol, 70(2), 186-197. doi: 10.1037/a0035730Lutgendorf, S. K., Sood, A. K., & Antoni, M. H. (2010). Host factors and cancer progression: biobehavioral signaling pathways and interventions. J Clin Oncol, 28(26), 4094-4099. doi: 10.1200/jco.2009.26.9357Malinski , V. M. (2011). Models and theories focused on human existence. Sudbury,MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning McEwen, B. (2008). Central effects of stress hormones in health and disease: Understanding the protective and damaging effects of stress and stress mediators. European Journal of Pharmacology, 583, 174-185. McEwen, B. S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. Physiol Rev, 87(3), 873-904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2006McEwen, B. S., & Stellar, E. (1993). Stress and the individual. Mechanisms leading to disease. Arch Intern Med, 153(18), 2093-2101. Skretkowicz, Victor (2010). Florence Nightingale's Notes on Nursing and Notes on Nursing for the Labouring Classes. New York: Springer Publishing Co.Spiegel, Daniel. (1997). The developing mind T. G. Press (Ed.)Wang, M., Zhao, J., Zhang, L., Wei, F., Lian, Y., Wu, Y., . . . Guo, C. (2017). Role of tumor microenvironment in tumorigenesis. J Cancer, 8(5), 761-773. doi: 10.7150/jca.17648 PART 2ResilienceChapter 4. Introduction Part 2 explores resilience from both biological and psychological perspectives in Chapters 1 and 2, respectively. Although the two are integrated within the human organism the decision to present each resilient process separately is based on how much there is to cover in order to heighten clinical awareness of key biological and psychological clinical targets and processes associated with resilience, in the most straightforward and understandable format. Knowledge of the processes of adaptation can serve as the basis of clinical assessments and interventions aimed at strengthening our patient's healing and resilient capabilities particularly during the vulnerable phases of the disease and treatment. As relevant, connections between biological and behavioural processes will be made throughout both chapters raising clinical implications for care. PART 3Poor resilienceChapter 7. Introduction Part 3 is designed to demonstrate the toxic biological and psychological impairments resulting from chronic stress that lead to poor resilient capabilities. If left unregulated, this mal-adaptation to stress facilitates the development of cancer or another chronic illness depending on the individual's genetic predisposition. Chapter 1, discusses the clinical significance of poor resilience which is the inability of the human organism to adapt biologically or cope behaviourally in the face of chronic stress, with progressively deleterious patho-physiological and psychosocial behavioural consequences(McEwen, 2015)). Poor resilience is associated with widespread damage to brain cell structures, synapses, and other biological pathways and functions which contribute to systemic inflammation. These neurobiological impairments throughout the human organism, caused by chronic stress strains the individual's ability to cope effectively, imposing a metabolic burden. When chronic stress is unregulated, the consequence ultimately is oxidative stress caused by an imbalance of reactive oxygen species (ROS) to anti oxidants, favouring ROS which damage cells and even DNA (McEwen, 2007)). In Chapter 2 we learn how these biological damages mediated by stress-induced epigenetic changes threaten homeostasis, healing processes, and immune defences which are now thought to be the scientific predicate for tumorigenesis, cancer progression and metastases, ultimately threatening the survival of the human organism (Andersen et al., 2008; Lutgendorf, 2012; McEwen, 2015). The purpose of Part 3 is to provide a comprehensive albeit simplified portrait of the whole person whose biology is progressively overloaded by an inchoate systemic inflammatory environment mediated by the quality of the individual's personal resources, supportive relationships, coping skills, lifestyle behaviours as well as other clinical environmental factors that also contribute to allostatic load/overload. Through this description, it is hoped that the clinical interventions to be discussed in Part 4 and Part 5 find their rationale with clear end targets within the larger context of the psycho-social and biological human being. And as you read about the progressive biological impairments due to stress which are further exacerbated by the tumour and its various treatments, it helps to remember that the stress- induced epigenetic changes are still reversible with effective interventions, and can still offer the individual an enhanced quality of life, an overall sense of well being, and for most, at least some relief from emotional distress/ existential suffering. Andersen, B. L., Yang, H. C., Farrar, W. B., Golden-Kreutz, D. M., Emery, C. F., Thornton, L. M., . . . Carson, W. E., 3rd. (2008). Psychologic intervention improves survival for breast cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial. Cancer, 113(12), 3450-3458. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23969Lutgendorf, S., De Geest, K, Bender, D., Ahmed A., Goodheart M., Dahmoush, L., Zimmerman M, et al (2012). Social influences on clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(23), 2885-2890. McEwen, B. S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: central role of the brain. Physiol Rev, 87(3), 873-904. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00041.2006McEwen, B. S. (2015). Biomarkers for assessing population and individual health and disease related to stress and adaptation. Metabolism, 64(3 Suppl 1), S2-S10. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2014.10.029PART 4Fostering healingChapter 10. Introduction Facilitating healing in nursing practice has to do with making an individual feel whole. Healing may be conceptualized in different interrelated ways. In the first half of this book, we learned about the role of healing in biological and psychological resilience. In PART 4 healing is addressed in terms of diverse strategies that may be mobilized by the nurse to foster innate and self- induced processes of healing in order to strengthen or restore the individual's resilient capabilities. Each chapter addresses a specific therapeutic approach and its respective role in influencing processes of healing and resilience. Theoretical and empirical perspectives are covered. We examine ways that nurses may leverage related scientific theory and evidence to offer healing or resilient- strengthening strategies. Therapeutic approaches are derived from both conventional and complementary modes of nursing practice. Chapter 11 discusses the key elements within the quality of the nurse-patient relationship that are conducive to creating a healing environment. Key components include the nurse's competence, effective communication, compassion, and sense of compassion, strengthened by a heightened sense of shared humanity and a shared belief that the patient is known by the nurse and his or her healthcare team (e.g.Durkin, Usher, & Jackson, 2019). Chapter 12 discusses nursing strategies in promoting emotion- regulating cognitive and behavioural coping capabilities of resilience. These strategies include facilitating more positive re appraisals of the cancer- and treatment-related threats, shifting patient goals and expectations toward new cognitive and behavioural coping skills, problem -solving skills for better self management of clinical issues in order to adapt more effectively to health- related stresses in the future (Antoni, 2013; Dunkel-Schetter, Feinstein, Taylor, & Falke, 1992; Jassim, Whitford, Hickey, & Carter, 2015). Personal and social resources or strengths that may be leveraged by the nurse to foster more effective coping capabilities in the face of adversity are also discussed. Chapter 13 has to do with fostering meaning in patients and caregivers who are struggling to find meaning in the face of a cancer diagnosis or a shortened life (e.g.Lee, Cohen, Edgar, Laizner, & Gagnon, 2006; Vehling & Philipp, 2018). Fostering meaning is approached from a theoretical and evidentiary perspective that serves as the predicate for suggesting relevant therapeutic approaches (Folkman, 2007; Park & Folkman, 1997; Vehling & Philipp, 2018). It reviews ways that the individual may come to terms with a threatening event such as the diagnosis of cancer, and or find new meaning in the cancer experience through the guided process of re-ordering and realigning beliefs and assumptions about the world and the self as a function of clinical realities. Chapter 14 has to do with ways to strengthen supportive relationships with close family members, as exemplified by the family caregiver. Research findings strongly suggest that patients heal when they are socially attached to loved ones who provide the support they need (Antoni et al., 2012; Lutgendorf, 2012). Chapter 15 addresses the potential healing effects of positive conscious beliefs or expectations of clinical benefits (Benson & Stark, 1997; Colloca & Barsky, 2020). These convictions may be based on previous experiences within the health care system or from family stories, or the health- related experiences of friends. The nurse may play an important role in supporting these expectations knowing that they trigger the biological reward system which has been shown to down regulate the stress response system and enable healing processes to re emerge. Similarly, the patients ' clinical outcomes may be modulated by the negative beliefs they hold regarding their treatment (e.g.Petrie & Rief, 2019). Aspects of the clinical environments that can further interfere with the goals of treatment by inadvertently suppressing healing effects are also highlighted and suggested strategies to counteract these potential ill effects are examined. Chapter 16 discusses self-induced healing strategies for instance through physical exercise or meditation which can induce the physiological relaxation response, again resulting in the down regulation of the stress response, facilitating the re emergence of critical biological healing or reparative processes (e.g.Bhasin et al., 2013; Carlson, 2016). Finally, Chapter 17 presents the critical role of touch and reiki in inducing therapeutic healing benefits in patients and caregivers (Jakubiak & Feeney, 2017; Post-White et al., 2003). ReferencesAntoni, M. H. (2013). Psychosocial intervention effects on adaptation, disease course and biobehavioral processes in cancer. Brain Behav Immun, 30 Suppl, S88-98. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2012.05.009Antoni, M. H., Lutgendorf, S. K., Blomberg, B., Carver, C. S., Lechner, S., Diaz, A., . . . Cole, S. W. (2012). Cognitive-behavioral stress management reverses anxiety-related leukocyte transcriptional dynamics. Biol Psychiatry, 71(4), 366-372. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2011.10.007Benson, Herbert, & Stark, Marg. (1997). Timeless healing : the power and biology of belief. New York: Simon & Schuster.Bhasin, M. K., Dusek, J. A., Chang, B. H., Joseph, M. G., Denninger, J. W., Fricchione, G. L., . . . Libermann, T. A. (2013). Relaxation response induces temporal transcriptome changes in energy metabolism, insulin secretion and inflammatory pathways. PLoS One, 8(5), e62817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062817Carlson, L. E. (2016). Mindfulness-based interventions for coping with cancer. Ann N Y Acad Sci, 1373(1), 5-12. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13029Colloca, L., & Barsky, A. J. (2020). Placebo and Nocebo Effects. N Engl J Med, 382(6), 554-561. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1907805Dunkel-Schetter, C., Feinstein, L. G., Taylor, S. E., & Falke, R. L. (1992). Patterns of coping with cancer. Health Psychol, 11(2), 79-87. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.11.2.79Durkin, J., Usher, K., & Jackson, D. (2019). Embodying compassion: A systematic review of the views of nurses and patients. J Clin Nurs, 28(9-10), 1380-1392. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14722Folkman, S., & Moskowitz, J. . (2007). Positive affect and meaning-focused coping during significant psychological stress. In H. A. W. S. M.Hewstone, J.B.F. de Wit, K. van den Bos, & M.S. Stroebe (Eds.), (Ed.), The scope of social psychology: Theory and applications (pp. 193-208). New York: NY:: Psychology Press.Jakubiak, B. K., & Feeney, B. C. (2017). Affectionate Touch to Promote Relational, Psychological, and Physical Well-Being in Adulthood: A Theoretical Model and Review of the Research. Pers Soc Psychol Rev, 21(3), 228-252. doi: 10.1177/1088868316650307Jassim, G. A., Whitford, D. L., Hickey, A., & Carter, B. (2015). Psychological interventions for women with non-metastatic breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 5, CD008729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008729.pub2Lee, V., Cohen, S. R., Edgar, L., Laizner, A. M., & Gagnon, A. J. (2006). Meaning-making and psychological adjustment to cancer: development of an intervention and pilot results. Oncol Nurs Forum, 33(2), 291-302. doi: 10.1188/06.onf.291-302Lutgendorf, S., De Geest, K, Bender, D., Ahmed A., Goodheart M., Dahmoush, L., Zimmerman M, et al (2012). Social influences on clinical outcomes of patients with ovarian cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(23), 2885-2890. Park, Crystal, & Folkman, Susan. (1997). Meaning in the Context of Stress and Coping. Review of General Psychology, 1, 115-144. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.1.2.115Petrie, K. J., & Rief, W. (2019). Psychobiological Mechanisms of Placebo and Nocebo Effects: Pathways to Improve Treatments and Reduce Side Effects. Annu Rev Psychol, 70, 599-625. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102907Post-White, J., Kinney, M. E., Savik, K., Gau, J. B., Wilcox, C., & Lerner, I. (2003). Therapeutic massage and healing touch improve symptoms in cancer. Integr Cancer Ther, 2(4), 332-344. doi: 10.1177/1534735403259064Vehling, S., & Philipp, R. (2018). Existential distress and meaning-focused interventions in cancer survivorship. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care, 12(1), 46-51. doi: 10.1097/spc.0000000000000324PART 5Clinical approaches Chapter 18. Introduction Part 5 addresses the main health-related concerns of patients and caregivers in respective chapters across the diagnostic (Chapter 19), treatment (Chapter 20), transition to survivorship (Chapter 21) and end- of -life (Chapter 22) phases; and psycho-social interventions predicated on evidence from clinical trials, systematic reviews and or meta analysis, are suggested. Nursing interventions are directed toward reducing emotional distress, promoting healing, strengthening resilient capabilities, and improving healthy lifestyles and the well being of the whole person even when there is no cure. However the first nursing objective must be to reduce emotional distress (Andersen et al., 2007; Riba et al., 2019) Through these clinical objectives, the nurse supports the medical goals of treatment by increasing the likelihood of the patients' ability to complete treatment. These psycho-social nursing objectives may also enhance the patients' and family caregivers' ability to live well with the disease as a chronic illness, thrive in survivorship and face the end of life in acceptance and serenity. These objectives are enabled by the quality of the therapeutic nurse-patient relationship across the continuum. One consistent theme exists throughout the cancer experience: the emotional distress of patients and caregivers (Hagedoorn, Sanderman, Bolks, Tuinstra, & Coyne, 2008; Riba et al., 2019). It may ebb and flow depending on the stage of disease, treatment and clinical results, but it always hovers in some form, posing a potential physical threat to patients' and family caregivers' future health. An estimated 20% to 52% of patients report high levels of distress depending on the stage and type of cancer, and its cancer- and treatment- related symptoms and side effects (Dans et al., 2017; Riba et al., 2019). An estimated 10-60% of caregivers experience similar anxiety, depression, grief, and poor physical health across the continuum, which may exceed that of patients, especially toward the terminal phase (e.g.Ahn, Romo, & Campbell, 2020; Dionne-Odom et al., 2016).). Given the emotional interdependence between patients and caregivers which impact their respective psychological and physical health, it is incumbent upon nurses to address the psychological and physical needs of both at all phases, starting at diagnosis and continuing throughout the disease and transition to survivorship (Ferrell 2018). Patient centred The findings from meta analyses and clinical trials that have assessed the effectiveness of various patient-centered psychosocial and behavioral interventions across the stages of disease, have generally reported positive patient outcomes with respect to quality of life, anxiety, depression and marital relationship (Hu, Liu, & Li, 2019; Kalter et al., 2018; Salsman et al., 2019). Patient- centered therapeutic interventions consisted of one or more of the following: providing relevant information, enhancing supportive relationships (Andersen (Andersen et al., 2007) coping skills training (Cohen et al., 2011)), meaning making (Lee, Cohen, Edgar, Laizner, & Gagnon, 2006)), mindfulness based cancer recovery intervention (Carlson et al., 2016)), mindfulness- based stress reduction (MBSR) interventions (Reich et al., 2017)), different modalities of meditation that often include the relaxation response technique (Bhasin et al., 2013)), and various strategies for symptom management (e.g.Lau et al., 2020)), and self management strategies (McCorkle et al., 2011). Ascertaining the most appropriate intervention(s) depends on the goals of care, the clinical target(s) and preferences of the patient. Patient-caregiver focus When patients are accompanied by the family caregiver, clinical interventions tend to focus on the patient based on a partially misplaced assumption that helping the patient helps the caregiver. Too often, the unique and mounting psychological, physical and informational needs of the caregiver with disease progression are neglected. This is an important clinical issue when both caregiver and patients at clinic visits are seen, and the caregiver's needs are assumed to be the same as the patient's (Dionne-Odom et al., 2015). The few studies reporting caregiver as well as patient improvements may reflect the extent to which the clinical interventions addressed their shared concerns (Northouse et al., 2013). This clinical finding underscores the importance of doing a nursing assessment of the patient and the caregiver. Caregiver focus In the year following a cancer diagnosis, correlational findings have suggested that as patient well being improved, caregiver health declined (Shaffer, Kim, & Carver, 2016). Although caregiver needs clearly increase as the patients' (their loved ones) cancer progresses toward its terminal phase, the finding highlights the unique experiences of family caregivers as well as the bidirectional effects on one another 's health (Kershaw et al (Kershaw et al., 2015). Clinical interventions that do not address caregiver concerns earlier in the disease trajectory will likely undermine the health of both patient and caregiver. Many nurses try to set aside meaningful time for patients and their informal caregivers, particularly at distressing moments. But the clinical reality too often is that patient and caregiver needs for psychosocial nursing interventions face a tremendous professional hurdle in hospital settings in particular where nursing goals are predominantly centred on treatment and physical symptoms related to the cancer or treatment. Neither staff rotations nor daily staff schedules build in qualitative time for patients and caregivers (e.g.Molin, 2018)). Although the psycho social interventions discussed in Part 4 fall within the purview of advanced nursing practice, there appears to be sufficient evidence to suggest that most clinic nurses would benefit from more psycho-social skills training as evidenced in part by the number of controlled studies in which the clinic nurses carrying out, for instance, self management interventions required further skill formation (Dionne-Odom et al., 2015). It is hoped that Part 5 which offers nurses an essential repository of clinical interventions supported by the latest scientific findings and the conceptual model, will help to foster a shift in nursing goals and objectives toward clinical interventions that address the psychosocial needs of the whole individual. Ahn, S., Romo, R. D., & Campbell, C. L. (2020). A systematic review of interventions for family caregivers who care for patients with advanced cancer at home. Patient Educ Couns. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.03.012Andersen, B. L., Farrar, W. B., Golden-Kreutz, D., Emery, C. F., Glaser, R., Crespin, T., & Carson, W. E., 3rd. (2007). Distress reduction from a psychological intervention contributes to improved health for cancer patients. Brain Behav Immun, 21(7), 953-961. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.03.005Bhasin, M. K., Dusek, J. A., Chang, B. H., Joseph, M. G., Denninger, J. W., Fricchione, G. L., . . . Libermann, T. A. (2013). Relaxation response induces temporal transcriptome changes in energy metabolism, insulin secretion and inflammatory pathways. PLoS One, 8(5), e62817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062817Carlson, L. E., Tamagawa, R., Stephen, J., Drysdale, E., Zhong, L., & Speca, M. (2016). Randomized-controlled trial of mindfulness-based cancer recovery versus supportive expressive group therapy among distressed breast cancer survivors (MINDSET): long-term follow-up results. Psychooncology, 25(7), 750-759. doi: 10.1002/pon.4150Cohen, L., Parker, P. A., Vence, L., Savary, C., Kentor, D., Pettaway, C., . . . Radvanyi, L. (2011). Presurgical stress management improves postoperative immune function in men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy. Psychosom Med, 73(3), 218-225. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0b013e31820a1c26Dans, M., Smith, T., Back, A., Baker, J. N., Bauman, J. R., Beck, A. C., . . . Scavone, J. L. (2017). NCCN Guidelines Insights: Palliative Care, Version 2.2017. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 15(8), 989-997. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2017.0132Dionne-Odom, J. N., Azuero, A., Lyons, K. D., Hull, J. G., Prescott, A. T., Tosteson, T., . . . Bakitas, M. A. (2016). Family Caregiver Depressive Symptom and Grief Outcomes From the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pain Symptom Manage, 52(3), 378-385. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.03.014Dionne-Odom, J. N., Azuero, A., Lyons, K. D., Hull, J. G., Tosteson, T., Li, Z., . . . Bakitas, M. A. (2015). Benefits of Early Versus Delayed Palliative Care to Informal Family Caregivers of Patients With Advanced Cancer: Outcomes From the ENABLE III Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol, 33(13), 1446-1452. doi: 10.1200/jco.2014.58.7824Hagedoorn, M., Sanderman, R., Bolks, H. N., Tuinstra, J., & Coyne, J. C. (2008). Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull, 134(1), 1-30. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.1Hu, Y., Liu, T., & Li, F. (2019). Association between dyadic interventions and outcomes in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Support Care Cancer, 27(3), 745-761. doi: 10.1007/s00520-018-4556-8Kalter, J., Verdonck-de Leeuw, I. M., Sweegers, M. G., Aaronson, N. K., Jacobsen, P. B., Newton, R. U., . . . Buffart, L. M. (2018). Effects and moderators of psychosocial interventions on quality of life, and emotional and social function in patients with cancer: An individual patient data meta-analysis of 22 RCTs. Psychooncology, 27(4), 1150-1161. doi: 10.1002/pon.4648Kershaw, T., Ellis, K. R., Yoon, H., Schafenacker, A., Katapodi, M., & Northouse, L. (2015). The Interdependence of Advanced Cancer Patients' and Their Family Caregivers' Mental Health, Physical Health, and Self-Efficacy over Time. Ann Behav Med, 49(6), 901-911. doi: 10.1007/s12160-015-9743-yLau, B. H. P., Chow, A. Y. M., Ng, T. K., Fung, Y. L., Lam, T. C., So, T. H., . . . Wong, D. F. K. (2020). Comparing the efficacy of integrative body-mind-spirit intervention with cognitive behavioral therapy in patient-caregiver parallel groups for lung cancer patients using a randomized controlled trial. J Psychosoc Oncol, 38(4), 389-405. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1722981Lee, V., Cohen, S. R., Edgar, L., Laizner, A. M., & Gagnon, A. J. (2006). Meaning-making and psychological adjustment to cancer: development of an intervention and pilot results. Oncol Nurs Forum, 33(2), 291-302. doi: 10.1188/06.onf.291-302McCorkle, R., Ercolano, E., Lazenby, M., Schulman-Green, D., Schilling, L. S., Lorig, K., & Wagner, E. H. (2011). Self-management: Enabling and empowering patients living with cancer as a chronic illness. CA Cancer J Clin, 61(1), 50-62. doi: 10.3322/caac.20093Molin, J., Lindgren, B.,Graneheim, U, Ringner, A. . (2018). Time together: a nursing intervention in psychiatric inpatient care-feasibility and effects. Int. J. Ment. Health Nurs., 27(6), 1698-1708. Northouse, L. L., Mood, D. W., Schafenacker, A., Kalemkerian, G., Zalupski, M., LoRusso, P., . . . Kershaw, T. (2013). Randomized clinical trial of a brief and extensive dyadic intervention for advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers. Psychooncology, 22(3), 555-563. doi: 10.1002/pon.3036Reich, R. R., Lengacher, C. A., Alinat, C. B., Kip, K. E., Paterson, C., Ramesar, S., . . . Park, J. (2017). Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction in Post-treatment Breast Cancer Patients: Immediate and Sustained Effects Across Multiple Symptom Clusters. J Pain Symptom Manage, 53(1), 85-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2016.08.005Riba, M. B., Donovan, K. A., Andersen, B., Braun, I., Breitbart, W. S., Brewer, B. W., . . . Darlow, S. D. (2019). Distress Management, Version 3.2019, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw, 17(10), 1229-1249. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0048Salsman, J. M., Pustejovsky, J. E., Schueller, S. M., Hernandez, R., Berendsen, M., McLouth, L. E. S., & Moskowitz, J. T. (2019). Psychosocial interventions for cancer survivors: A meta-analysis of effects on positive affect. J Cancer Surviv, 13(6), 943-955. doi: 10.1007/s11764-019-00811-8Shaffer, K. M., Kim, Y., & Carver, C. S. (2016). Physical and mental health trajectories of cancer patients and caregivers across the year post-diagnosis: a dyadic investigation. Psychol Health, 31(6), 655-674. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2015.1131826

Read more less

Book SynopsisThis text provides a comprehensive, state-of-the-art review of this field, and will serve as a valuable practical resource for clinicians with an interest in conducting urodynamics. The book reviews new data about the indications, conduct and interpretation of various aspects of urodynamic testing. With an emphasis on clinical urodynamics, it is arranged into sections that correspond with the basic elements of urodynamic testing; noninvasive urodynamics (uroflow and post void residual), cystometrogram, storage studies (leak point pressures, stability, compliance and capacity) and voiding phases (pressure flow study). Other testing modalities that are discussed include EMG testing, fluoroscopy, and provocative maneuvers.Practical Urodynamics for the Clinician will serve as a very useful and practical resource for physicians and researchers dealing with, and interested in, this complex physiologic testing tool. It will provide a concise yet comprehensive summary of the field that will help guide the selection of patients for the study, preparation of the patient, the conduct of the study and finally the interpretation of the urodynamics evaluation.Trade Review“This textbook provides a practical update on UD. Figures and photographs are useful and appropriate. This publication is a recommended purchase for urologists and physicians involved in incontinence and low urinary tract symptoms management.” (European Urology Today, June-July, 2016)“Urologists interested in setting up a urodynamics practice should look to this book for helpful tips about the equipment and design of a functional urodynamics suite. Both practitioners new to urodynamics and veterans of lower urinary tract evaluation can use this as a condensed review of the different components of urodynamic testing. Overall, it would be a helpful addition for any urology practice.” (Alana Murphy, Doody's Book Reviews, March, 2016)Table of Contents1 The Basic Science behind Practical/Clinical Urodynamic AnalysisMatthew Fraser2 Urodynamics Equipment--What the Clinician Needs to Know to Set Up the LabAndrew P. Windsperger and Brian J. Flynn3 The Clinical Evaluation of the Patient Who Requires Urodynamics Maria Voznesensky and R. Clay McDonough4. Noninvasive Urodynamics Oscar Alfonso Storme and Kurt Anthony McCammon5 The CystometrogramRyan L. Steinberg and Karl J. Kreder6 The Pressure Flow StudyKirk M. Anderson and David A. Hadley7 The EMGKristy M. Borawski8 The Use of FluoroscopyTom Feng and Karyn S. Eilber9 Putting it All Together: Practical Advice on Clinical UrodynamicsJulian Wan and John Stoffel10 NomogramsDavid Jiang and Jennifer T. Anger11 Ambulatory Urodynamics Paholo G. Barboglio Romo and E. Ann Gormley 12 Bedside UrodynamicsAndrew C. Peterson13 Practical Urodynamics in ChildrenSherry S. Ross and John S. Wiener

Read more less