Description

Book Synopsis
Provenance has been one of the major scientific applications in archaeology for a hundred years. The ''Golden Age'' began in the 1950s, when large programmes were initiated focussing on bronzes, ceramics, and lithics. However, these had varying impact, ranging from wide acceptance to outright rejection. This Element reviews some of these programmes, mainly in Eurasia and North America, focussing on how the complexity of the material, and the effects of human behaviour, can impact on such studies. The conclusion is that provenance studies of lithic materials and obsidian are likely to be reliable, but those on ceramics and metals are increasingly complicated, especially in the light of mixing and recycling. An alternative is suggested, which focusses more on using scientific studies to understand the relationship between human selectivity and processing and the wider resources available, rather than on the simple question of ''where does this object come from''.

Retrospective and Prospective for Scientific

    Product form

    £17.00

    Includes FREE delivery

    Order before 4pm tomorrow for delivery by Fri 3 Jul 2026.

    A Paperback by A. M. Pollard

    15 in stock

      Trusted by thousands of customers. See 2,385+ Customer Reviews

      View other formats and editions of Retrospective and Prospective for Scientific by A. M. Pollard

      Publisher: Cambridge University Press
      Publication Date: 1/31/2025
      ISBN13: 9781009592222, 978-1009592222
      ISBN10: 100959222X
      Also in:
      Archaeological theory

      Description

      Book Synopsis
      Provenance has been one of the major scientific applications in archaeology for a hundred years. The ''Golden Age'' began in the 1950s, when large programmes were initiated focussing on bronzes, ceramics, and lithics. However, these had varying impact, ranging from wide acceptance to outright rejection. This Element reviews some of these programmes, mainly in Eurasia and North America, focussing on how the complexity of the material, and the effects of human behaviour, can impact on such studies. The conclusion is that provenance studies of lithic materials and obsidian are likely to be reliable, but those on ceramics and metals are increasingly complicated, especially in the light of mixing and recycling. An alternative is suggested, which focusses more on using scientific studies to understand the relationship between human selectivity and processing and the wider resources available, rather than on the simple question of ''where does this object come from''.

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account