Description
Book SynopsisOver recent decades, international humanitarian law has been shaped by the omnipresence of so-called expert manuals. Astute and engaging, this discerning book provides a comprehensive account of these black letter rules and commentaries produced by private expert groups and demonstrates why the general acceptance of these expert manuals is largely unjustified.
This theoretically grounded book bridges the divide between theory and practice by linking legal theory to the doctrinal and practical concerns of the laws of war. The author innovatively links interdisciplinary insights to the needs of military lawyers in practice, showing the pitfalls of relying on private manuals as arguable restatements and interpretations of the law 'as it is'. At the same time, he explains why expert processes are so successful and why this should be of concern to all of us.
Stimulating and challenging, this book will prove essential reading for students and scholars of public international law, legal theory, and those focussing on the laws of war more specifically. Its practical approach will also greatly benefit legal practitioners working in the field of military law.
Trade Review‘Petrov’s Expert Laws of War
provides a fresh perspective and scrutiny of an otherwise routinely used tool in IHL.’ -- Aisha Nazzal, University of Tasmania Law Review
'This is an excellent work that fills a large gap in international humanitarian law. That gap is how to understand, utilise and value the soft law made by experts, which increasingly fills the spaces where hard law is yet to solidify. Such analysis makes this work an essential piece of scholarship for those who take progress in this area seriously.' --Alexander Gillespie, University of Waikato, New Zealand
'This book aims at bringing to light the phenomenon of expert manuals, notable for example in the field of IHL. There is a tension between the deadlock in international treaty-making and the substitutive function of experts proclaiming to restate the law. Political legitimacy lies with those who do not act (states), while those who act are deprived of it (experts). A blind spot is thus brought to the fore in a highly engaging manner in this interesting book: to what extent is ''private legislation'' an acceptable avenue in the crafting of international legal rules? Can this process gloss over the insufficiencies of the law and ''restate'' it? Can it respond to the demands for law by the concerned actors, when States do not respond? --Robert Kolb, University of Geneva, Switzerland
'What role do expert manuals play for the development of international humanitarian law? How can their great factual importance be reconciled with the rules on the sources of international law as well as requirements of legitimacy and representation? Anton Petrov's book is a lucid engagement with these questions. It will be of great value to scholars and practitioners in international humanitarian law and beyond.' --Helmut Aust, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany
Table of ContentsContents: 1. Introduction: Just another instance of expert rule? 2. A survey of expert processes in international humanitarian law 3. The methodological challenges of expert processes 4. Normatively flawed, but empirically valid expert manuals 5. The community of international humanitarian law 6. The expert groups’s interpretive authority 7. A critical review of expert groups as advocates of international humanitarian law 8. Conclusion: Expert processes as a mirror of life Bibliography Index
