Description

Book Synopsis
Foregrounding religious, racialized and gendered disputes, Decision Making and Controversies in State Supreme Courts examines state supreme court decision making during controversies. Using case studies within Alabama, Louisiana, and Wisconsin, Salmon Shomade identifies and analyses the predominant factors influencing decision making in times of court contention. In this book, Shomade assesses how the justices' interpersonal dynamics and controversial issues of religion, race, and gender impact their decision making. Specifically, the book focuses on former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore and the Ten Commandments monument crisis, Louisiana Chief Justice Bernette Johnson and her elevation dispute, and former Wisconsin Justice David Prosser and his conflicts with two female colleagues. The book contributes to the literature on decision making in state appellate courts by building upon established models utilized for assessing these courts.

Trade Review

In this book Salmon Shomade probes three extraordinary episodes in state supreme courts, analyzing their impact on those courts and their implications for explanation of judicial behavior. Taking a careful and creative approach, Shomade provides valuable insights on decision making in appellate courts.

-- Lawrence Baum, The Ohio State University
"Like Martin Shapiro before him, Shomade convincingly argues that political scientists must broaden their focus beyond the U.S. Supreme Court and include state courts if we truly want to understand courts as political institutions and test dominant models. Other scholars have studied increasingly contested judicial races as a facet of political realignment, but Shomade takes the inquiry deeper to the institution itself, exposing the significant racial and gender dimensions of political and interpersonal conflict, offering a rare intersectional approach to law and courts." - Sally Kenney, Tulane University -- Sally Kenney, Tulane University

Table of Contents

Preface

Introduction

Acknowledgments

Chapter 1: Decision Making in the U.S Supreme Court and State Supreme Courts

Chapter 2: Chief Justice Roy Moore and the Alabama Supreme Court 2001–2003

Chapter 3: Elevating Chief Justice Bernette Johnson in Louisiana

Chapter 4: Verbal and Physical Assaults in Wisconsin Supreme Court

Chapter 5: Controversies, State Court Judges and Decision Making

Bibliography

Decision Making and Controversies in State

    Product form

    £27.00

    Includes FREE delivery

    RRP £30.00 – you save £3.00 (10%)

    Order before 4pm today for delivery by Mon 22 Jun 2026.

    A Paperback by Salmon A. Shomade

    Out of stock


      View other formats and editions of Decision Making and Controversies in State by Salmon A. Shomade

      Publisher: Lexington Books
      Publication Date: 1/16/2023 12:08:00 AM
      ISBN13: 9781498543019, 978-1498543019
      ISBN10: 1498543014

      Description

      Book Synopsis
      Foregrounding religious, racialized and gendered disputes, Decision Making and Controversies in State Supreme Courts examines state supreme court decision making during controversies. Using case studies within Alabama, Louisiana, and Wisconsin, Salmon Shomade identifies and analyses the predominant factors influencing decision making in times of court contention. In this book, Shomade assesses how the justices' interpersonal dynamics and controversial issues of religion, race, and gender impact their decision making. Specifically, the book focuses on former Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore and the Ten Commandments monument crisis, Louisiana Chief Justice Bernette Johnson and her elevation dispute, and former Wisconsin Justice David Prosser and his conflicts with two female colleagues. The book contributes to the literature on decision making in state appellate courts by building upon established models utilized for assessing these courts.

      Trade Review

      In this book Salmon Shomade probes three extraordinary episodes in state supreme courts, analyzing their impact on those courts and their implications for explanation of judicial behavior. Taking a careful and creative approach, Shomade provides valuable insights on decision making in appellate courts.

      -- Lawrence Baum, The Ohio State University
      "Like Martin Shapiro before him, Shomade convincingly argues that political scientists must broaden their focus beyond the U.S. Supreme Court and include state courts if we truly want to understand courts as political institutions and test dominant models. Other scholars have studied increasingly contested judicial races as a facet of political realignment, but Shomade takes the inquiry deeper to the institution itself, exposing the significant racial and gender dimensions of political and interpersonal conflict, offering a rare intersectional approach to law and courts." - Sally Kenney, Tulane University -- Sally Kenney, Tulane University

      Table of Contents

      Preface

      Introduction

      Acknowledgments

      Chapter 1: Decision Making in the U.S Supreme Court and State Supreme Courts

      Chapter 2: Chief Justice Roy Moore and the Alabama Supreme Court 2001–2003

      Chapter 3: Elevating Chief Justice Bernette Johnson in Louisiana

      Chapter 4: Verbal and Physical Assaults in Wisconsin Supreme Court

      Chapter 5: Controversies, State Court Judges and Decision Making

      Bibliography

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account