Search results for ""Author Professor Dr Burkhard Hess""

EU consumer law affords a number of substantive rights to consumers. Often however, the protection of these rights is undermined as a consequence of the complexity and lack of knowledge in the Member States of EU consumer legislation and case law. This volume presents a comparative examination of the enforcement of these rights in the EU Member States, with an extensive empirical evaluation of national procedural rules and practices. Following a comprehensive assessment of the nature and characteristics of EU consumer law, the volume identifies and evaluates key procedural themes that shape the equivalent and effective protection of EU consumer rights in light of European Court of Justice case law. Alongside Impediments of National Procedural Law to the Free Movement of Judgments: Luxembourg Report on European Procedural Law Volume I, this volume offers the most comprehensive, empirically-driven comparative investigation of national civil procedure thus far undertaken in Europe. Using an extensive dataset comprising hundreds of interviews and responses to a multi-language online survey, it examines the rules of civil procedure in all EU Member States, and identifies their impact on the protection of consumers under EU consumer law. This volume will be of interest to all practitioners, academics and policymakers with a focus on judicial cooperation, civil justice and consumer protection, and will facilitate a better understanding of the impact of national procedural laws on the effectiveness of EU consumer protection.

Read more less

On the 27th of September 1968, the six EC Member States signed the Brussels Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters. 50 years later, the European Court of Justice and the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg organised an international conference on the major developments, achievements and challenges of the European law of civil procedure. This book brings together contributions written by members of the Court of Justice of the European Union, established academics and young researchers reflecting on the Brussels Regime. It offers insights on the dialogue between the Court of Justice and national courts on the interpretation of the European law of civil procedure and how it shaped the Europeanisation of private international law. Beyond this assessment of the past, the book offers some reflections on the future architecture of the European law of civil procedure and the suitability of the Brussels regime to the challenges of the current era. This will be read with interest by academics, practitioners and policy-makers.

Read more less

What road should procedural innovation take? More than 20 experts from practice and academia discuss the future of EU civil procedure, ranging from cross-border enforcement to mutual trust, from E-CODEX to Online Dispute Resolution. They offer blueprints for a reinvigorated judicial cooperation.

Read more less

Regulation No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 (EIR) is the cornerstone of European insolvency law. The Regulation, which is directly applicable in all Member States, is the legal basis for cross-border insolvencies within the European Union. Paving the way for a new European insolvency law, the Heidelberg-Luxembourg-Vienna Report carries out a comprehensive legal and empirical evaluation of European insolvency law practice in the Member States. Based on thorough analyses the general reporters evaluate the Regulation and provide recommendations for its current revision. General reporters Professor Burkhard Hess (Luxembourg/Heidelberg), Dr Christian Koller (Vienna), Dr Björn Lankemann (Heidelberg/Luxembourg), Dr Robert Magnus (Heidelberg), Professor Paul Oberhammer (Vienna/London/St Gallen), Professor Thomas Pfeiffer (Heidelberg), Professor Andreas Piekenbrock (Heidelberg), Michael Slonina (Vienna) National reporters Dr Krista Pisani Bencini (Valletta), Samantha Bewick (London), Prof Dr Eric Bylander, LLD (Uppsala), Dr Rosanne Bonnici (Valletta), Prof Dr Remo Caponi (Florence), Mgr Slavomír M.Èauder (Prague), Dr Jeanette Ciantar (Valletta), Prof Dr Zoltaá Csehi (Budapest), Prof Dr Gilles Cuniberti, LLM (Luxembourg), Prof Dr Aleš Galiè (Ljubljana), Prof Dr Francisco Garcimartín (Madrid), Prof Dr Iván Heredia (Madrid), Prof Burkhard Hess (Luxembourg/Heidelberg), Dr Laura Kirilevièiûtë (Lithuania), Prof Dr Nikolaos Klamaris (Athens), Dr Björn Laukemann (Heidelberg/Luxembourg), Dennis Lievens, LLM (Heidelberg), Prof Dr Tuula Linna, LLD (Lapland), Dr Robert Magnus (Heidelberg), Prof Dr Federico M Mucciarelli (London), Dr Carl Friedrich Nordmeier (Wiesbaden), Dr Ailbhe O'Neill (Dublin), Nina Orehek (Ljubljana), Polina Pavlova (Luxembourg), Joanna Perkins (London), Prof Thomas Pfeiffer (Heidelberg), Prof Andreas Piekenbrock (Heidelberg), Dr Tomáš Richter (Prague), Veronika Sajadova (Latvia), Mag Gottfried Schellmann (Vienna), Christopher Seagon (Heidelberg), Kristina Sirakova (Luxembourg), Michael Slonina, LLM (Vienna), Prof Dr Elisa Torralba (Madrid), Prof Dr Paul Varul (Tartu), Prof Dr PM Michael Veder (Nijmegen), Dr Signe Viimsalu (Tallinn), Gheorghe-Liviu Zidaru (Bucharest)

Read more less

The study is a result of a collaborative research project addressing “The Implementation of the New Insolvency Regulation – Improving Cooperation and Mutual Trust”. The project was undertaken by the Max Planck Institute Luxembourg for Procedural Law, the University of Vienna and the University of Milan, and co-funded by the European Union as part of the Commission’s Action Grants 2013 for Civil Justice. The focus of the study concerns specific issues of cross-border insolvencies under the recast of the Insolvency Regulation which already has been prepared by a large part of the contributing authors in the Heidelberg-Vienna-Luxembourg Report. The study is comprised of three major topics: 1.The Regulation’s extended scope of application, including pre-insolvency and hybrid proceedings, the relationship between Article 1(1) of the Regulation and its Annex A, as well as the interplay between the Insolvency Regulation and the Brussels Ibis Regulation; 2.the cooperation between main and secondary insolvency proceedings, the new instruments, such as “synthetic proceedings”, destined to avoid or postpone the opening of secondary proceedings, further the cooperation between administrators and courts of different proceedings as well as protocols to enhance cooperation; 3.insolvencies of groups of companies, with a particular focus on jurisdiction, COMI-migration, “group coordination proceedings” and other instruments of coordination.

Read more less