Description
Book SynopsisAmbiguity, present in all aspects of the poem, is seen as central to Milton's authorial intentions.Shawcross proposes that the many ambiguities surrounding Milton's dramatic poem
Samson Agonistes are intentional: the actual words, the dates of composition, the genre, and the characters - particularly Samson and Dalila but including Manoa, Harapha, and the Chorus. Ambiguity also lies in Milton's presentation of political issues both philosophical and practical, his treatment of gender concepts, the constant questioning of the reader, and the poem's effect. Discussing all these elements, Shawcross follows with a detailed reading of the text which argues that it remains purposefully ambiguous, reflecting Milton's own recognition of the uncertainty of the content, and suggesting that Milton himself would question some of the nice 'solutions' that modern scholarship has offered in the last two decades. JOHN SHAWCROSS is Professor of English, Emeritus, University of Kentucky.
Trade ReviewOne of the few scholars qualified to write magisterially about any aspect of Milton's life and work succinctly interprets anew his dramatic poem modestly and convincingly. * CHOICE *
Enormously helpful [in] guiding readers through the complexities of both Milton's text and its accumulated criticism.... A remarkably helpful book, both for its balanced and incisive analysis of Samson itself and for its skilful discussion of important criticism. * RELIGION AND LITERATURE *
Table of ContentsThe world of "Samson Agonistes"; uncertainty and the text; the dramatic work and its reading; Samson - God's champion, a type, or individual?; Dalila - seductress or wife?; politics in the destabilized text; biographical intrusions; the uncertainties of irony; a hermeneutics of the text; "Samson Agonistes" and consistencies of belief.
