Description

Book Synopsis
An analysis of the discrepancy between the ways Antonin Scalia argued the Constitution should be interpreted versus how he actually interpreted the law. This volume examines Scalia's discussions of textualism in his speeches, extrajudicial writings, and judicial opinions. Throughout his writings, Scalia argues textualism is the only acceptable form of constitutional interpretation.

Trade Review
No scholar before Langford has systematically analyzed every one of Scalia's opinions in the three constitutional territories explored in Scalia v. Scalia - Eighth Amendment ‘Cruel and Unusual' doctrine, First Amendment ‘Establishment' and ‘Free Exercise' doctrine, and abortion doctrine. Langford's new contribution should interest legal academics and rhetorical scholars alike."" - Colin Starger, associate professor of law at the University of Baltimore

Scalia v Scalia Opportunistic Textualism in

    Product form

    £37.00

    Includes FREE delivery

    RRP £38.95 – you save £1.95 (5%)

    Order before 4pm today for delivery by Thu 20 Aug 2026.

    A Hardback by Catherine L. Langford

    10 in stock

      Trusted by thousands of customers. See 2,385+ Customer Reviews

      View other formats and editions of Scalia v Scalia Opportunistic Textualism in by Catherine L. Langford

      Publisher: The University of Alabama Press
      Publication Date: Publication Date: 1/30/2018 12:00:00 AM
      ISBN13: 9780817319700, 978-0817319700
      ISBN10: 0817319700
      Also in:
      Communication studies Semantics, discourse analysis, stylistics Methods, theory and philosophy of law

      Description

      Book Synopsis
      An analysis of the discrepancy between the ways Antonin Scalia argued the Constitution should be interpreted versus how he actually interpreted the law. This volume examines Scalia's discussions of textualism in his speeches, extrajudicial writings, and judicial opinions. Throughout his writings, Scalia argues textualism is the only acceptable form of constitutional interpretation.

      Trade Review
      No scholar before Langford has systematically analyzed every one of Scalia's opinions in the three constitutional territories explored in Scalia v. Scalia - Eighth Amendment ‘Cruel and Unusual' doctrine, First Amendment ‘Establishment' and ‘Free Exercise' doctrine, and abortion doctrine. Langford's new contribution should interest legal academics and rhetorical scholars alike."" - Colin Starger, associate professor of law at the University of Baltimore

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account