Description
Book Synopsis* A selection of debates discussing central issues in cognitive science. * The debates are written by renowned experts in the field. * The debates cover the middle ground as well as the extremes * Addresses topics such as the amount of innate knowledge, bounded rationality and the role of perception in action.
Trade Review"
Contemporary Debates in Cognitive Science is an excellent introduction to debates in the philosophy of cognitive science. Many of this volume's 18 previously unpublished papers also provide overviews of recent work by the authors, so this would also be a good choice for those who would like to keep up with the latest thinking of many leaders in the field."
Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews "This is a remarkable volume. It’s an excellent text for upper division courses, and it also makes important original contributions to research on a number of “hot” topics in cognitive science." Stephen Stich, Rutgers University"
"This is an impressive collection of papers by a very strong group of philosophers. Students of philosophy and cognitive science will find that this book afffords a valuable introduction to a range of problems that are both basic and important. Experts will find that the papers make new and significant contributions to living debates. I recommend this book to anyone interested in the nature of mind and in the prospects for scientific understanding of its nature." Alva Noë, University of Caifornia, Berkeley
Table of ContentsAcknowledgments vii
Notes on Contributors viii
Preface xiii
Just How Modular Is the Mind? 1
1 The Case for Massively Modular Models of Mind 3
Peter Carruthers
2 Is the Mind Really Modular? 22
Jesse J. Prinz
3 Is the Human Mind Massively Modular? 37
Richard Samuels
How Much Knowledge of Language Is Innate? 57
4 Irrational Nativist Exuberance 59
Barbara C. Scholz and Geoffrey K. Pullum
5 The Case for Linguistic Nativism 81
Robert J. Matthews
6 On the Innateness of Language 97
James McGilvray
Has Cognitive Science Shown That Human Beings Are Cognitively Bounded, Or Irrational? 113
7 Bounded and Rational 115
Gerd Gigerenzer
8 Bounded Rationality and the Enlightenment Picture of Cognitive Virtue 134
David Matheson
Are Rules and Representations Necessary To Explain Systematicity? 145
9 Cognition Needs Syntax but not Rules 147
Terence Horgan and John Tienson
10 Phenomena and Mechanisms: Putting the Symbolic, Connectionist, and Dynamical Systems Debate in Broader Perspective 159
Adele Abrahamsen and William Bechtel
Can Consciousness and Qualia Be Reduced? 187
11 Consciousness and Qualia Can Be Reduced 189
William G. Lycan
12 Consciousness and Qualia Cannot Be Reduced 202
Brie Gertler
Does Cognitive Science Need External Content at All? 217
13 Locating Meaning in the Mind (Where It Belongs) 219
Ray Jackendoff
14 The Intentional Inexistence of Language – But Not Cars 237
Georges Rey
Is the Aim of Perception to Provide Accurate Representations? 257
15 Is the Aim of Perception to Provide Accurate Representations? 259
Kirk Ludwig
16 Is the Aim of Perception to Provide Accurate Representations? A Case for the “No” Side 275
Christopher Viger
Can Mental States, Knowledge in Particular, Be Divided Into a Narrow Component and a Broad Component? 289
17 Can Cognition be Factorized into Internal and External Components? 291
Timothy Williamson
18 The Internal and External Components of Cognition 307
Ralph Wedgwood
Index 326
