Description
Book SynopsisShows how courts use fiction in their treatment of sovereign violence. Sovereignty is often cast as a limit-concept, constituent force, determining the boundary of law.
Archiving Sovereignty reverses this to explain how judicial pronouncements inscribe and sustain extravagant claims to exceptionality and sovereign solitude.
Trade ReviewSet in and around the Indian Ocean,
Archiving Sovereignty is a thoughtful meditation on how the law traffics in fictions—the ‘as if'—as it adjudicates state sovereignty in contexts of colonial and postcolonial violence. Elegantly written, it invites an important consideration of the law's complex work as historical archivist."" - Avery F. Gordon, University of California, Santa Barbara
""Stewart Motha re-envisions the Indian Ocean as a material site of law, violence, and dispossession that he compellingly terms an ‘archive of the present.' Drawing comparatively from Australia, South Africa, and the Chagos Archipelago, Motha offers a beautifully crafted analysis of law and sovereignty, how they draw from and disavow their entangled colonial histories."" - Renisa Mawani, University of British Columbia
""Of the many interwoven themes in
Archiving Sovereignty, the driving motif for me is Kant's ‘as if,' which responds to the disappearance of metaphysical objectivity. If objects are the only knowable facts, the unknowable is suspended in the ‘as if.' This is true for a lie (such as acting as if law were grounded in nature or acting as if sovereignty were a power in itself) as well as for a fertile fiction. We must then think of the ‘as if' in its relation to an absence of first law, and think of sovereignty as the ‘as if' of a postulation of ‘nothing' at the centre of existence. Stewart Motha explores this double dimension, its commingling and unravelling, its aporias and suggestions that are of course inexhaustible. This research is at the heart of the concerns and expectations of the present time."" - Jean-Luc Nancy, The European Graduate School
""Through a series of brilliant readings of contemporary cases of exile and exclusion the source of legality, the archive, is exposed as an unstable archipelago and excoriated as the fictive mark of sovereign solitude."" - Peter Goodrich, Cardozo School of Law, New York
