Description
Book SynopsisMakes a compelling case that William Howard Taft's devotion to the Constitution of 1787 contributed to his progressivism. In contrast to the majority of scholarship, Burns explores the ways Taft's commitment to both the Constitution and progressivism drove his political career and the decisions he made as president and chief justice.
Trade ReviewA comprehensive and convincing study of Taft's Progressive credentials. Combining Herbert Croley's nationalism with a deeply studied Constitutional faith, Taft as president and as chief justice vindicated the state-building capacity of the federal government to express and institute an articulate national will through a reformed Republican Party. In marked contrast, both the Democratic Party and Woodrow Wilson appear mired in an intellectual, constitutional, and partisan past premised on states' rights, patronage, and local interests." - Eldon J. Eisenach, professor of political science emeritus, University of Tulsa
"This major revisionist interpretation of William Howard Taft rejects the long-standing view that he was merely a standpat conservative and hidebound legalist. Kevin J. Burns argues persuasively that Taft was simultaneously a political reformer and a constitutional conservative. Deeply researched and clearly written, this book traces Taft's support for substantial Progressive reforms amid his irrevocable conviction that the founders' Constitution should not be transformed or abandoned. How Taft reconciled these imperatives is explained in this work of keen historical insight and remarkable contemporary relevance. This book will stand as a landmark in the study of Taft's constitutionalism." - Johnathan O'Neill, professor of history, Georgia Southern University
"This excellent book crafts an astute reconsideration of William Howard Taft's ideas and career. Rejecting the usual portrayal of Taft as conservative, Burns convincingly shows him to be a committed reformer, but a reformer who was also dedicated to acting within constitutional norms. Thus, we learn Taft was a different kind of Progressive than Roosevelt, one whose contributions were, perhaps, more permanent because they were ensconced in law and administrative structure. This is an important contribution to understanding both Taft and Progressive Era politics." - Peri E. Arnold, professor of political science emeritus, University of Notre Dame, and author of
Remaking the Presidency: Roosevelt, Taft, and Wilson, 1901-1916 "Here is a book that we have needed for a very long time. Our image of William Howard Taft has for too long been buried under countless layers of historiographical caricature, in which blanket condemnations of his legalism and catty jokes about his weight have been made to stand in for careful analysis. Kevin Burns's attentive and sympathetic study shows us what we have been missing. Unlike those Progressives, then and now, who see the evisceration of the Constitution as the sine qua non for reform, Taft believed it was possible to use constitutional means to achieve Progressive ends. Thanks to Burns's labors, we may be able to reconsider that possibility ourselves." - Wilfred M. McClay, G.T. and Libby Blankenship Chair in the History of Liberty, University of Oklahoma
