Description
Book SynopsisThe end of the twentieth and the beginning of the twenty-first centuries have involved much discussion on overhauling and refining a scholarly understanding of the verbal system for first-century Greek. These discussions have included advances in verbal aspect theory and other linguistic approaches to describing the grammatical phenomena of ancient languages. This volume seeks to apply some of that learning to the narrow realm of how prohibitions were constructed in the first-century Greek of the New Testament.
Part 1 The Great Prohibition Debate seeks to demonstrate that verbal aspect theory has a better explanation than traditional
Aktionsart theory for authorial choices between the negated present imperative and the negated aorist subjunctive in expressing prohibitions in the Greek New Testament.
Part 2 All the Prohibitions in the Greek NT continues to examine prohibitions, but is more of an exercise in functional linguistics. That is, rather than apply verbal aspec
Table of ContentsContents: The
Aktionsart View of Greek Prohibitions: «
Stop doing that.» vs. «
Do not start that.» – The Failures of the
Aktionsart View: Verb Tense-Forms ≠ Kind of Action – Verbal Aspect Theory & Greek Prohibitions: «
Do not be doing that.» vs.
«Do not do that.» – The Successes of a Verbal Aspect View: Verb Tense-Forms ≈ Author’s Perspective – The Negated Present Tense Prohibitions – The Negated Aorist Tense Prohibitions – Prohibitions Using Other Negated Verb Constructions – Prohibitions Using Negated Dependent Clause Constructions – Lexical Prohibitions:
«Refrain from that.» – Prohibitory Emulation Statements: «
We do not do that.» – Prohibitory Questions: «
Why are you doing that?» – Warnings & Promises as Prohibitions: «
Those who do that will be punished.» – Other Negative Expressions as Prohibitions: «
No, don’t!» – Conclusion: Summary & Prospects.
