Description
Book SynopsisToni Rønnow-Rasmussen explores the distinction between what is finally good and what is finally good-for: he argues that these two value notions are equally important in ethics and practical deliberation. His analysis challenges the widespread idea that there are no genuine practical and moral dilemmas.
Trade ReviewThis volume provides an engaging discussion of the distinction between relational and nonrelational goods, that is, being good for a subject rather than being good simpliciter. * W. Simkulet, CHOICE *
Table of ContentsPart I: Elements 1: Value Taxonomy 2: Good and Good-For 3: Challenging Value Monism 4: Challenging Good Monism 5: Good-For Unitarianism Part II: A Fitting-Attitude Analysis of Value 6: Fitting-Attitude Analysis 7: The Logical Consequence of Fitting Attitudes 8: The Fitting-Attitude Analysis Revised 9: 'Sake' 10: FA and Motivating Reasons 11: Favourings for No Reason 12: Mind the Value Gap