Description

Book Synopsis

A collection of essays providing an interdisciplinary account of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's judicial rhetoric.



Trade Review

The Rhetoric of Judging Well truly blazes a trail about how to take the rhetoric of legal reasoning out of the partisan, polarized world of legal journalism and bring it intelligibly into public discourse. Rhetoricians will gain copious insights about legal reasoning, and legal scholars will discover rhetorical tools for their research.”

—William M. Keith,coauthor of Beyond Civility: The Competing Obligations of Citizenship


The Rhetoric of Judging Well offers a distinctive approach to legal rhetoric by providing a comprehensive and thorough account of the jurisprudence of a single, important justice. I know of no other book quite like it.”

—Austin Sarat,author of When Governments Break the Law: The Rule of Law and the Prosecution of the Bush Administration



Table of Contents

Acknowledgements

Introduction

Part 1. Judgment in Classical Rhetoric

1. Justice Kennedy and the Interpretation of Legal Texts: The Classical Background

Michael Gagarin

2. Sex and Moral Pollution in the Rhetoric of Justice Kennedy

Eugene Garver

Part 2. Judgment in Stasis Theory

3. Justice Kennedy’s Definitional Construction of Gay Rights in Lawrence and Obergefell: Legal Rhetorical Analysis with the Interpretive Stases

Martin Camper

4. Justice Kennedy, Natural Liberty, and Classical Stasis Theory: Advancing Free Speech with Rhetorical Knowledge and Interpretive Argumentation

Susan E. Provenzano

5. Romer v. Evans: Justice Kennedy, Justice Scalia, and the Rhetoric of Judging Well

Sean Patrick O’Rourke

Part 3. Judgment in Contemporary Rhetorical Theory

6. Constructing a Free Agent: “Good Judgment” in Justice Kennedy’s Lawrence v. Texas Opinion

Clarke Rountree

7. Justice Kennedy and Natural Law Argumentation

Francis J. Mootz III

8. Justice Kennedy, Federalism, and the Nonproduction of Rhetorical Knowledge

Darien Shanske

Part 4. Judgment and Justice Kennedy’s Ethos

9. Justice Kennedy’s Free Speech Optimism

Ashutosh Bhagwat

10. Strongmen and Neurotics: Visible Struggle and the Construction of Judicial Ethos

James A. Gardner

11. The Anticlassification Topic and Equal-Liberty Template

Leslie Gielow Jacobs

Part 5. Justice Kennedy’s Misjudgments: Women, Race, and Immigrants

12. Performing a “View from Nowhere”: Justice Kennedy’s Denial of Embodied Knowledge

Elizabeth C. Britt

13. Women in Justice Kennedy’s Jurisprudence

Kathryn Stanchi

14. Justice Kennedy’s Anticlassification Doctrine: Not Judging Well

Rebecca E. Zietlow

15. Whose Freedom? Justice Kennedy’s Sovereignty, Autonomy, and Liberty Discourses in the Immigration Cases

Leticia M. Saucedo

Part 6. Assessment

16. Rhetorical Vision and Judgment: Did Justice Anthony M. Kennedy Judge Well?

David A. Frank

List of Contributors

Index of Cases

Index of Names and Subjects

The Rhetoric of Judging Well

    Product form

    £88.36

    Includes FREE delivery

    RRP £103.95 – you save £15.59 (14%)

    Order before 4pm tomorrow for delivery by Mon 10 Aug 2026.

    A Hardback by David A. Frank, Francis J. Mootz III

    1 in stock

      Trusted by thousands of customers. See 2,385+ Customer Reviews

      View other formats and editions of The Rhetoric of Judging Well by David A. Frank

      Publisher: Pennsylvania State University Press
      Publication Date: Publication Date: 21/03/2023
      ISBN13: 9780271094847, 978-0271094847
      ISBN10: 0271094842

      Description

      Book Synopsis

      A collection of essays providing an interdisciplinary account of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's judicial rhetoric.



      Trade Review

      The Rhetoric of Judging Well truly blazes a trail about how to take the rhetoric of legal reasoning out of the partisan, polarized world of legal journalism and bring it intelligibly into public discourse. Rhetoricians will gain copious insights about legal reasoning, and legal scholars will discover rhetorical tools for their research.”

      —William M. Keith,coauthor of Beyond Civility: The Competing Obligations of Citizenship


      The Rhetoric of Judging Well offers a distinctive approach to legal rhetoric by providing a comprehensive and thorough account of the jurisprudence of a single, important justice. I know of no other book quite like it.”

      —Austin Sarat,author of When Governments Break the Law: The Rule of Law and the Prosecution of the Bush Administration



      Table of Contents

      Acknowledgements

      Introduction

      Part 1. Judgment in Classical Rhetoric

      1. Justice Kennedy and the Interpretation of Legal Texts: The Classical Background

      Michael Gagarin

      2. Sex and Moral Pollution in the Rhetoric of Justice Kennedy

      Eugene Garver

      Part 2. Judgment in Stasis Theory

      3. Justice Kennedy’s Definitional Construction of Gay Rights in Lawrence and Obergefell: Legal Rhetorical Analysis with the Interpretive Stases

      Martin Camper

      4. Justice Kennedy, Natural Liberty, and Classical Stasis Theory: Advancing Free Speech with Rhetorical Knowledge and Interpretive Argumentation

      Susan E. Provenzano

      5. Romer v. Evans: Justice Kennedy, Justice Scalia, and the Rhetoric of Judging Well

      Sean Patrick O’Rourke

      Part 3. Judgment in Contemporary Rhetorical Theory

      6. Constructing a Free Agent: “Good Judgment” in Justice Kennedy’s Lawrence v. Texas Opinion

      Clarke Rountree

      7. Justice Kennedy and Natural Law Argumentation

      Francis J. Mootz III

      8. Justice Kennedy, Federalism, and the Nonproduction of Rhetorical Knowledge

      Darien Shanske

      Part 4. Judgment and Justice Kennedy’s Ethos

      9. Justice Kennedy’s Free Speech Optimism

      Ashutosh Bhagwat

      10. Strongmen and Neurotics: Visible Struggle and the Construction of Judicial Ethos

      James A. Gardner

      11. The Anticlassification Topic and Equal-Liberty Template

      Leslie Gielow Jacobs

      Part 5. Justice Kennedy’s Misjudgments: Women, Race, and Immigrants

      12. Performing a “View from Nowhere”: Justice Kennedy’s Denial of Embodied Knowledge

      Elizabeth C. Britt

      13. Women in Justice Kennedy’s Jurisprudence

      Kathryn Stanchi

      14. Justice Kennedy’s Anticlassification Doctrine: Not Judging Well

      Rebecca E. Zietlow

      15. Whose Freedom? Justice Kennedy’s Sovereignty, Autonomy, and Liberty Discourses in the Immigration Cases

      Leticia M. Saucedo

      Part 6. Assessment

      16. Rhetorical Vision and Judgment: Did Justice Anthony M. Kennedy Judge Well?

      David A. Frank

      List of Contributors

      Index of Cases

      Index of Names and Subjects

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account