Description
Book SynopsisThis study focuses on the practice of punishment, as it is inflicted by the state. The author''s first-hand experience with penal reform, combined with philosophical reflection, has led him to develop a theory of punishment that identifies the principles of sentencing and corrections on which modern correctional systems should be built. This new theory of punishment is built on the view that the central function of the law is to reduce the need to use force in the resolution of disputes. Professor Cragg argues that the proper role of sentencing and sentence administration is to sustain public confidence in the capacity of the law to fulfil that function. Sentencing and corrections should therefore be guided by principles of restorative justice. He points out that, although punishment may be an inevitable concomitant of law enforcement in general and sentencing in particular, inflicting punishment is not a legitimate objective of criminal justice. The strength and appeal of this acco
Table of ContentsPreface An Introduction 1 PUNISHMENT AS RETRIBUTION 2 THE POINT OF PUNISHMENT: FORWARD-LOOKING ACCOUNTS 3 TWO HYBRID THEORIES Part I: H.L.A. Hart’s compromise solution Part II: Teleological retributivism 4 THE FUNCTION OF LAW AND THE NATURE OF LEGAL OBLIGATION 5 THE ENFORCEMENT OF LAW Part I: The function of enforcement Part II: The practical dimensions of enforcement— policing and Adjudication Part III: Enforcement, reform, and the concept of diversion 6 TOWARDS A THEORY OF SENTENCING: RESPONSIBILITY, GUILT AND THE IDEA OF A CRIMINAL OFFENCE Part I: The nature of the task Part II: The principle of responsibility and the concept of guilt Part III: Weighing the seriousness of offences 7 SENTENCING AND THE IDEA OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE Part I: Two preliminary sentencing options Part II: Sentencing as conflict resolution Part III: Practical implications 8 TOWARDS A PHILOSOPHY OF PUNISHMENT
