Description
Book SynopsisThis book explores the phenomenon of total power in East Asia, with particular attention to China, Korea, and Japan. It shows how total power enables an examination of regional experience as a part of global context in order to demarcate the connections with other countries and regions that have similar political cultures, such as those in Central Asia, the Middle East, and East Africa. Moreover, it elucidates that the phenomenon of total power unpacks the interrelations not only between different countries, but also between political, economic, religious, or cultural aspects of the region as a whole, and of each country in particular. This book takes East Asia as a classic example of where total power has achieved the highest forms of development during traditional periods in the form of absolute economic dependence of society on the state, ideologically enshrined by a system of moral obligations toward supreme power that allowed for the establishment of a monopoly on forced labour, and the appropriation and distribution of social products. The author emphasizes the importance of exploring the tradition of total power with reference to the ongoing global crisis of European democracy. In doing so, the book shows that democratization has not brought qualitative changes to the political culture of East Asia. An essential interdisciplinary read for scholars studying political science, particularly East-West relations, this book situates East Asian political culture within a global context.
Table of ContentsChapter 1. Formation of East Asian Complex of Total Power A.East Asian Complex of TotalPower during Traditional Period B.Total Power in China C.Adaptation of Total Power inKorea D.Adaptation of Total Power in Japan E.Total Power and the Problem of RegionalOrder.- Chapter 2. Modernization of East Asian Complex of Total Power.- Chapter 3. Japanese Empire: Modernized Total Power.- Chapter 4. Total Power and East Asian Nation-States during Cold War.- Chapter 5. East Asian Tradition of Total Power and Neoliberal Globalization.
