Description

Book Synopsis

The Bourgeois Charm of Karl Marx & the Ideological Irony of American Jurisprudence employs a well-known body of work, Marx's, to explain the inevitable limits of scholarship, in the hope of encouraging academic boldness and diversity, especially within American jurisprudence.

While scholarly meaning-making has been addressed in specific academic areas—mostly linguistics and philosophy—it has never been addressed in a triangular relationship between the text and its instigator, as well as its subsequent interpellator. Furthermore, while addressed as a result of difference, it has never been addressed for today's liberal theory, which includes liberal jurisprudence, through the mirror of Marxist difference.

Scholarship is the unique product of the instigator's private and public subjectivity, as all theory is aimed to be communicated and used by the scholarly community and beyond. Understanding its public life, textual instigators aim to control its meaning employing various research methods to observe reality and then to convey their narrative, or 'philosophy'. But meaning is not fixed; it is negotiated by instigators and those theories interpellate according to their own private and public subjectivity, which covers their ideology. Negotiated meaning is always a surprise to both parties involved, surprise which is at once ironic and ideological.



Table of Contents

Acknowledgments

List of Illustrations

Introduction

1Marx, Irony and Ideology -- Negotiating Meaning

2Meaning as a Result of Textual Instigation and Interpellation

1Contextualizing Marx: Differentiating to Embrace or to Reject?

1Marx and Dewey

2Linguistic and Cultural Barriers to Marx 's Works

3Cultural Lifespan

4Marxian Ideology as Soviet, ergo, Undesired, Subjectivity

5Marx 's Un-American Attitude toward Religion

6Marx 's Human Progress and Self-Promotion

2Marxian or Marxism: Labels Differentiating Content or Fabricating Difference?

3Textual Differences and Marx 's Interdisciplinary Dialectics

1Dialectics and Ideology: Thinking, Researching and Incorporating Observations

2Marxian Interdisciplinary Dialectics

3Dialectics and Post-Marxian Scholarship

4Private Subjectivity, Alienation and Theory Production

1Alienation as Creative Reification

2Alienation and Ideological Resistance to Power Structures

3Karl Marx, the Alienated Alienating Intellectual

5Ideology as Public (Political) Subjectivity

1Ideology through the Ages

2Marxian and Marxist Views on Ideology

3Academic (Ideological) Purges?

4Marx and Ideological Identity

5Ideology and Ideological Propaganda

6Mass Media -- Ideology Is the Message

6The Irony of Scholarship Production

1Encoded Irony in T₁

2Dormant Irony as T₁ Textual Omissions

3Textual Irony and Rorty 's Intellectual Ironist

7Ideological Irony -- S₂ Actuating T₁ 's Meaning

1Irony and Direct Scholastic Criticism

2Scholarship as (Ironic) Polite Criticis

8The Bearable Lightness of Jurisprudential Irony

1Jurisprudential Irony as Inescapable Trade-Off between Scholastic Ambition and Reality

2Jurisprudential Irony and the Socratic Method of Teaching Law

3Jurisprudential Irony -- Byproduct of Legal Hegemony

4Encoded Jurisprudential Irony

5United States Supreme Court Justices as Embodied Irony: The Late Justice Scalia and Justice Gorsuch

9Ironical Ideology, Difference of Meaning and Philosophical Camaraderie

1Plato 's Concepts of Just and Justice

2Aristotle 's Dialectical Universals

3Thomas Hobbes ' and John Locke 's Ideological Differences and Different Epistemological Conclusions

4The Intersection between the Abstract and Concrete Facets of the Law According to Montesquieu, Kant and Rousseau

5Jeremy Bentham 's Common Sense and Grotius ' Technocratic Approach to Law

6American Jurisprudence and Marx: Strange Bedfellows … Not

10Irony, Jurisprudential Meaning-Making and Ideological Camaraderie

1Classical Liberalism

2Law as Science or the Rejection of Ideology

3Formalism and Realism: Two Sides of the Same Coin

4The Limits of Rawls and Dworkin: Justice and Historical Contingency

5Critical Legal Studies and Marx

6Feminism and Queer Theory

7Intersectionality -- Bridging the Gap between Theory and Reality

Summary and Conclusion

References

Index

The Bourgeois Charm of Karl Marx & the

    Product form

    £25.50

    Includes FREE delivery

    RRP £30.00 – you save £4.50 (15%)

    Order before 4pm today for delivery by Sat 8 Aug 2026.

    A Paperback / softback by Dana Neacsu

    Out of stock

      Trusted by thousands of customers. See 2,385+ Customer Reviews

      View other formats and editions of The Bourgeois Charm of Karl Marx & the by Dana Neacsu

      Publisher: Haymarket Books
      Publication Date: Publication Date: 01/12/2020
      ISBN13: 9781642593679, 978-1642593679
      ISBN10: 1642593672

      Description

      Book Synopsis

      The Bourgeois Charm of Karl Marx & the Ideological Irony of American Jurisprudence employs a well-known body of work, Marx's, to explain the inevitable limits of scholarship, in the hope of encouraging academic boldness and diversity, especially within American jurisprudence.

      While scholarly meaning-making has been addressed in specific academic areas—mostly linguistics and philosophy—it has never been addressed in a triangular relationship between the text and its instigator, as well as its subsequent interpellator. Furthermore, while addressed as a result of difference, it has never been addressed for today's liberal theory, which includes liberal jurisprudence, through the mirror of Marxist difference.

      Scholarship is the unique product of the instigator's private and public subjectivity, as all theory is aimed to be communicated and used by the scholarly community and beyond. Understanding its public life, textual instigators aim to control its meaning employing various research methods to observe reality and then to convey their narrative, or 'philosophy'. But meaning is not fixed; it is negotiated by instigators and those theories interpellate according to their own private and public subjectivity, which covers their ideology. Negotiated meaning is always a surprise to both parties involved, surprise which is at once ironic and ideological.



      Table of Contents

      Acknowledgments

      List of Illustrations

      Introduction

      1Marx, Irony and Ideology -- Negotiating Meaning

      2Meaning as a Result of Textual Instigation and Interpellation

      1Contextualizing Marx: Differentiating to Embrace or to Reject?

      1Marx and Dewey

      2Linguistic and Cultural Barriers to Marx 's Works

      3Cultural Lifespan

      4Marxian Ideology as Soviet, ergo, Undesired, Subjectivity

      5Marx 's Un-American Attitude toward Religion

      6Marx 's Human Progress and Self-Promotion

      2Marxian or Marxism: Labels Differentiating Content or Fabricating Difference?

      3Textual Differences and Marx 's Interdisciplinary Dialectics

      1Dialectics and Ideology: Thinking, Researching and Incorporating Observations

      2Marxian Interdisciplinary Dialectics

      3Dialectics and Post-Marxian Scholarship

      4Private Subjectivity, Alienation and Theory Production

      1Alienation as Creative Reification

      2Alienation and Ideological Resistance to Power Structures

      3Karl Marx, the Alienated Alienating Intellectual

      5Ideology as Public (Political) Subjectivity

      1Ideology through the Ages

      2Marxian and Marxist Views on Ideology

      3Academic (Ideological) Purges?

      4Marx and Ideological Identity

      5Ideology and Ideological Propaganda

      6Mass Media -- Ideology Is the Message

      6The Irony of Scholarship Production

      1Encoded Irony in T₁

      2Dormant Irony as T₁ Textual Omissions

      3Textual Irony and Rorty 's Intellectual Ironist

      7Ideological Irony -- S₂ Actuating T₁ 's Meaning

      1Irony and Direct Scholastic Criticism

      2Scholarship as (Ironic) Polite Criticis

      8The Bearable Lightness of Jurisprudential Irony

      1Jurisprudential Irony as Inescapable Trade-Off between Scholastic Ambition and Reality

      2Jurisprudential Irony and the Socratic Method of Teaching Law

      3Jurisprudential Irony -- Byproduct of Legal Hegemony

      4Encoded Jurisprudential Irony

      5United States Supreme Court Justices as Embodied Irony: The Late Justice Scalia and Justice Gorsuch

      9Ironical Ideology, Difference of Meaning and Philosophical Camaraderie

      1Plato 's Concepts of Just and Justice

      2Aristotle 's Dialectical Universals

      3Thomas Hobbes ' and John Locke 's Ideological Differences and Different Epistemological Conclusions

      4The Intersection between the Abstract and Concrete Facets of the Law According to Montesquieu, Kant and Rousseau

      5Jeremy Bentham 's Common Sense and Grotius ' Technocratic Approach to Law

      6American Jurisprudence and Marx: Strange Bedfellows … Not

      10Irony, Jurisprudential Meaning-Making and Ideological Camaraderie

      1Classical Liberalism

      2Law as Science or the Rejection of Ideology

      3Formalism and Realism: Two Sides of the Same Coin

      4The Limits of Rawls and Dworkin: Justice and Historical Contingency

      5Critical Legal Studies and Marx

      6Feminism and Queer Theory

      7Intersectionality -- Bridging the Gap between Theory and Reality

      Summary and Conclusion

      References

      Index

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account