Description

Book Synopsis

This book presents a critique of Derrida from a Nietzschean perspective. Questioning the often-advertised association between Nietzsche and Derrida, it focuses instead on important differences and incompatibilities between Nietzsche’s naturalistic paradigm and Derrida’s textual paradigm. Peter Bornedal argues that Nietzsche’s position points us toward a pragmatic and constructionist epistemology based on a naturalist world-view, which was cutting-edge in his days, while Derrida’s epistemology reduces theories of knowledge to a general textualism. In short, Nietzsche is not the predecessor of deconstruction—or, generally, postmodernism—that he is often portrayed to be. His thinking does not advocate postmodernism’s suspension of truth, reason, logic, and understanding, but rather replicates the paradigms of emerging disciplines of his day, such as biology, psychology, cognitive science, and linguistics. His thinking is not playfulness for its own sake and does not defend formal transcendentalist principles such as ‘différance.’ The Barren Epistemology of Jacques Derrida: A Critique of Deconstruction from a Nietzschean Perspective argues instead that Derrida’s introduction of the supposedly novel différance-logic may be analyzed as a transcendentalist validation of logical errors often addressed in earlier Western thinking in order to be avoided, such as the contradiction in Aristotle, or the paralogism in Kant. With this critical view, the work re-examines différance-thinking and questions whether inconsistencies are manufactured rather than discovered in deconstructionist interpretation.



Table of Contents

Introduction

Chapter 1: Paralogism of Writing: Introducing a Difference between writing and Writing

Chapter 2: The Anti-Logic of Différance: Self-Contradiction Raised to Transcendental Law

Chapter 3: Signifier, Signified, and the Continuum: A Nietzsche-Saussurean Epistemology

Chapter 4: Intentions of Speaker and Speech: Defending Speech-Acts and Ordinary Language

Chapter 5: The ‘Gay Science’ of Derrida: Nietzsche’s Thinking as Playful Différance-Logic

Chapter 6: Nietzsche versus Derrida: On Truth, Presence, Metaphysics, Woman, and Nihilism

Conclusion

The Barren Epistemology of Jacques Derrida: A

    Product form

    £72.90

    Includes FREE delivery

    RRP £81.00 – you save £8.10 (10%)

    Order before 4pm today for delivery by Sat 27 Jun 2026.

    A Hardback by Peter Bornedal

    Out of stock

      Trusted by thousands of customers. See 2,385+ Customer Reviews

      View other formats and editions of The Barren Epistemology of Jacques Derrida: A by Peter Bornedal

      Publisher: Lexington Books
      Publication Date: 15/01/2024
      ISBN13: 9781666927177, 978-1666927177
      ISBN10: 1666927171

      Description

      Book Synopsis

      This book presents a critique of Derrida from a Nietzschean perspective. Questioning the often-advertised association between Nietzsche and Derrida, it focuses instead on important differences and incompatibilities between Nietzsche’s naturalistic paradigm and Derrida’s textual paradigm. Peter Bornedal argues that Nietzsche’s position points us toward a pragmatic and constructionist epistemology based on a naturalist world-view, which was cutting-edge in his days, while Derrida’s epistemology reduces theories of knowledge to a general textualism. In short, Nietzsche is not the predecessor of deconstruction—or, generally, postmodernism—that he is often portrayed to be. His thinking does not advocate postmodernism’s suspension of truth, reason, logic, and understanding, but rather replicates the paradigms of emerging disciplines of his day, such as biology, psychology, cognitive science, and linguistics. His thinking is not playfulness for its own sake and does not defend formal transcendentalist principles such as ‘différance.’ The Barren Epistemology of Jacques Derrida: A Critique of Deconstruction from a Nietzschean Perspective argues instead that Derrida’s introduction of the supposedly novel différance-logic may be analyzed as a transcendentalist validation of logical errors often addressed in earlier Western thinking in order to be avoided, such as the contradiction in Aristotle, or the paralogism in Kant. With this critical view, the work re-examines différance-thinking and questions whether inconsistencies are manufactured rather than discovered in deconstructionist interpretation.



      Table of Contents

      Introduction

      Chapter 1: Paralogism of Writing: Introducing a Difference between writing and Writing

      Chapter 2: The Anti-Logic of Différance: Self-Contradiction Raised to Transcendental Law

      Chapter 3: Signifier, Signified, and the Continuum: A Nietzsche-Saussurean Epistemology

      Chapter 4: Intentions of Speaker and Speech: Defending Speech-Acts and Ordinary Language

      Chapter 5: The ‘Gay Science’ of Derrida: Nietzsche’s Thinking as Playful Différance-Logic

      Chapter 6: Nietzsche versus Derrida: On Truth, Presence, Metaphysics, Woman, and Nihilism

      Conclusion

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account