Description
Book SynopsisOffers an original way of thinking literary history and a new approach to the question of the relations between literature and politics in modernity
Trade Review"Emily Sun subtly and lucidly explores the role of literature as that which 'exposes us to the possibility of an aesthetics and politics of plurality.' Framing her powerful readings with King Lear as a theater at the limit of sovereignty, Sun traces the return of this play in the literary history it opens up, a literature that exposes us to the "radical asymmetry of human perspectives" even as it offers new possibilities for altered forms of listening and telling. The literary texts she reads become, thus, not only sites that reveal a crisis of sovereignty, but also serve as events that demand from us, as she says, a responsiveness before responsibility, and that, in putting "'the world' into question in the face of the unknown," open up a new literary as well as political mode of co-existence." -- -Cathy Caruth Emory University "An excellent work of theoretical synthesis applied to thoughtful, continuously challenging readings of texts that at once form an intuitive unity and at the same time consistently resist and correct preconception through Sun's circumspect, nimble critical strategies." -- -Paul Fry Yale University With her canny intuition for unlikely cultural trajectories, Emily Sun adroitly unfolds a discussion of three aesthetic interventions in a critique of political tyranny. As she moves from Shakespeare's King Lear to Wordsworth's poetry and Agee/Evans collaborative documentation of the impoverished of the 30s Depression, she draws us into a reading adventure, refocusing our vision of familiar texts, making them new in relation to her redefinition of what responsible writing and reading might be. This is literary analysis at its most thought- provoking. -- -Elisabeth Bronfen University of Zurich "Emily Sun has written an ambitious study that is a delight to read on how literary works foster a truly active rather than passive spectatorship as well as a "plural speech" necessary to avoid tyrannous political theologies. Drawing in major contemporary theorists, her patient and clarifying style, with its ability to zoom from large questions to telling textual detail, compels us to think anew about this task. All of us, her moving book insists, literary consumers or creators, must "succeed" great works of art in the sense of accepting and bringing to completion their demanding legacy." -- -Geoffrey Hartman Yale University
