Description
Book SynopsisThomas Hobbes and James Harrington were two mid-17th century political thinkers who are known today as spokesmen of opposite positions. This book rewrites the common view, arguing that behind their disagreements there lay a common perspective on the subject of sovereignty.
Trade Reviewthis slim but muscular study. ... an analysis of unusual elegance and power. * Jonathan Scott, English Historical Review. *
In this slim but muscular study the relationship between two of seventeenth centry Englands most important political writers comes under scrutiny from the standpoint of some sharply determined claims and juxtapositions ... an analysis of unusual elegance and power. * Jonathan Scott, English Historical Review, June 00. *
Professor Fukuda's analysis depends upon a careful reading in both primary and secondary materials. His interweaving of philosophical argument and historical circumstances is complex, but his frequent reiteration and rephrasing of his main points easily leads the reader. The explanatory footnotes also show the depth of his studies. These are impressive positives ... a valuable contribution to understanding both thought and practice in English constitutionalism. * Seventeenth-Century News *
In this elegant, brief book Fukuda seeks to elevate the reputation of James Harrington, and largely succeeds. * D. R. Bisson, CHOICE *
In this slim but muscular study the relationship between two of seventeenth-century England's most important political writers comes under scrutiny from the standpoint of some sharply determined claims and juxtapositions... an analysis of unusual elegance and power. * Jonathon Scott, English historical Review *
Fukuda displays historical and analytic acumen in a work that is admirably clear, concise and provocative. Those who take seriously the republican and (or) the social-contract traditions will likely find Fukuda's ideas instructive and disagree with some or all of them. * Deborah Baumgold, Albion *
