Description

Book Synopsis

Mike Duncan argues that the Farrer Hypothesis is the best working solution to the Synoptic Problem in New Testament studies by way of rhetorical theory, as he sees the Synoptic Problem as less about source and textual criticism and more as a writing problem that concerns how and why they were composed The book’s six chapters feature case studies of different aspects of gospel rhetoric, such as how the different post-resurrection accounts interact with each other and how the apostles are portrayed from gospel to gospel. These chapters form a collective argument—that the synoptic gospels are competing rhetorical narratives about Jesus, with the authors of Luke and Matthew reacting to previous gospels with the goal of superseding the previously composed versions of Jesus’s life. However, Duncan acknowledges that the Farrer Hypothesis has special difficulties and cannot be pushed beyond an educated guess, that the Synoptic Problem remains an unsolvable problem due to a lack of evidence and lost original context, and that it is only a philosophical acceptance of the inaccessibility of a solution that paradoxically allows a frank and unsentimental view of the alternatives.



Trade Review

Mike Duncan provides a refreshing new take on the debate of how to explain the many passages shared in the first three canonical gospels. Instead of asking who copied what, he explores the possibility of competing narratives, a phenomenon that can be observed in the numerous extra-canonical narratives about Jesus and his first followers. As a student of the field of rhetoric, he understands the phenomenon of creative writing in antiquity and doesn't hesitate to apply his insights to the holy grail of New Testament exegesis, the so-called Synoptic Problem.

-- David J. Trobisch, author of The First Edition of the New Testament

Table of Contents

Introduction

Chapter 1: The History of the Synoptic Problem: Preferring the Worst Explanation, Except For All The Others

Chapter 2: Competing Narratives: What Happened After The Resurrection?

Chapter 3: The Farrer Hypothesis, the Universality of Writing, and Unsolvable Problems

Chapter 4: Mark the Originator: John the Baptist and the Invention of the Gospel Genre

Chapter 5: The Rebranding of the Twelve Apostles in the Gospel of Matthew

Chapter 6: How Luke Destroyed the Sermon on the Mount: The Physical Composition of the Gospel of Luke

Conclusion

Appendix: Dating the Gospels

Bibliography

Rhetoric and the Synoptic Problem

    Product form

    £76.50

    Includes FREE delivery

    RRP £85.00 – you save £8.50 (10%)

    Order before 4pm today for delivery by Thu 18 Jun 2026.

    A Hardback by Mike Duncan

    Out of stock


      View other formats and editions of Rhetoric and the Synoptic Problem by Mike Duncan

      Publisher: Rowman & Littlefield
      Publication Date: 31/05/2022
      ISBN13: 9781978713086, 978-1978713086
      ISBN10: 1978713088

      Description

      Book Synopsis

      Mike Duncan argues that the Farrer Hypothesis is the best working solution to the Synoptic Problem in New Testament studies by way of rhetorical theory, as he sees the Synoptic Problem as less about source and textual criticism and more as a writing problem that concerns how and why they were composed The book’s six chapters feature case studies of different aspects of gospel rhetoric, such as how the different post-resurrection accounts interact with each other and how the apostles are portrayed from gospel to gospel. These chapters form a collective argument—that the synoptic gospels are competing rhetorical narratives about Jesus, with the authors of Luke and Matthew reacting to previous gospels with the goal of superseding the previously composed versions of Jesus’s life. However, Duncan acknowledges that the Farrer Hypothesis has special difficulties and cannot be pushed beyond an educated guess, that the Synoptic Problem remains an unsolvable problem due to a lack of evidence and lost original context, and that it is only a philosophical acceptance of the inaccessibility of a solution that paradoxically allows a frank and unsentimental view of the alternatives.



      Trade Review

      Mike Duncan provides a refreshing new take on the debate of how to explain the many passages shared in the first three canonical gospels. Instead of asking who copied what, he explores the possibility of competing narratives, a phenomenon that can be observed in the numerous extra-canonical narratives about Jesus and his first followers. As a student of the field of rhetoric, he understands the phenomenon of creative writing in antiquity and doesn't hesitate to apply his insights to the holy grail of New Testament exegesis, the so-called Synoptic Problem.

      -- David J. Trobisch, author of The First Edition of the New Testament

      Table of Contents

      Introduction

      Chapter 1: The History of the Synoptic Problem: Preferring the Worst Explanation, Except For All The Others

      Chapter 2: Competing Narratives: What Happened After The Resurrection?

      Chapter 3: The Farrer Hypothesis, the Universality of Writing, and Unsolvable Problems

      Chapter 4: Mark the Originator: John the Baptist and the Invention of the Gospel Genre

      Chapter 5: The Rebranding of the Twelve Apostles in the Gospel of Matthew

      Chapter 6: How Luke Destroyed the Sermon on the Mount: The Physical Composition of the Gospel of Luke

      Conclusion

      Appendix: Dating the Gospels

      Bibliography

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account