Description
Book SynopsisIn this collection of essays on the metaphysical issues pertaining to death, the meaning of life, and freedom of the will, John Martin Fischer argues (against the Epicureans) that death can be a bad thing for the individual who dies. He defends the claim that something can be a bad thing--a misfortune--for an individual, even if he never experiences it as bad (and even if he does not any longer exist). Fischer also defends the commonsense asymmetry in our attitudes toward death and prenatal nonexistence: we are indifferent to the time before we are born, but we regret that we do not live longer. Further, Fischer argues (against the immortality curmudgeons, such as Heidegger and Bernard Williams), that immortal life could be desirable, and shows how the defense of the (possible) badness of death and the (possible) goodness of immortality exhibit a similar structure; on Fischer''s view, the badness of death and the goodness of life can be represented on spectra that display certain conti
Trade Reviewa provocative work whose constitutive essays provide both an overview of the landscape of the debates in which Fischer is engaging... as well as productive engagement in their technicalities... applied philosophy at its best. * James Stacey Taylor, Mind *
Table of Contents1. Introduction, "Meaning in Life and Death: Our Stories" ; 2. "Why is Death Bad?" ; 3 C "Death, Badness, and the Impossibility of "Death and the Psychological Conception of Personal Identity" ; 5. "Earlier Birth and Later Death: Symmetry Through Thick and Thin" ; 6. "Why Immortality is Not So Bad" ; 7. "Epicureanism About Death and Immortality" ; 8. "Stories" ; 9. "Free Will, Death, and Immortality: The Role of Narrative" ; 10. "Stories and the Meaning of Life"
