Description
Book SynopsisNegotiating Capability and Diaspora: A Philosophical Politics scrutinizes Indian economist cum philosopher Amartya Sen's theory of capability, which rose as a critique of the modern American philosopher John Rawls's theory of primary goods. Ashmita Khasnabish develops Sen's theory of capability as a leitmotif throughout the book. She focuses on the following themes: 1) how Amartya Sen's theory of capability offers strength to immigrants and underdogs; 2) the significance of John Rawls's theory for Sen's theory of capability; 3) two aspects of Sen's theory: on the one hand it exposes the asymmetry between people of power and the powerless due to the discrepancy of resources, and on the other hand it shows how the powerless or the underdogs or the minorities could exert their will-power through the paradigm of choices to overcome; 4) finally, Sri Aurobindo's theory of democracy, which intersects with John Rawls's theory of comprehensive doctrines and political justice. Khasnabish also di
Trade ReviewDr. Ashmita Khasnabish, the author of Negotiating Capability: A Philosophical Politics, seeks to develop an original answer to the daunting question: What must the individuals in the diaspora do to solve their cultural dislocations and the violations of their human dignity? In the process of addressing this question, she engages three classical approaches in Global moral and political philosophy. They are: Entitlement Theories, Capability Challenges, and Eastern Pragmatist Ontologies and Philosophical Politics. . . .Khasnabish . . . adds her own voice, which she describes as that of a Diasporic Asian feminist. It is from this distinct perspective that she articulates a rich synthesis of the resource of the West and East, as she engages in the moral and political project of enabling the diaspora to be capable of satisfying its existential rights and to negotiate capability and existence, reason and emotion. In the end Khasnabish addresses the daunting question with which this review began. * CLR James Journal *
“Leading on from her previous monographs, Ashmita Khasnabish’s new volume, Negotiating Capability and Diaspora: A Philosophical Politics, is another unusual enquiry into contemporary postcolonial thought and literature. By combining the philosophies of Eastern and Western thinkers, Khasnabish creates a syncretic paradigm that casts the work of such diverse writers as Toni Morrison, Amitav Ghosh, and Jhumpa Lahriri in a new light. This book is an original and imaginative engagement with contemporary postcolonial and feminist debates.” -- Melanie Otto, Trinity College
“Ashmita Khasnabish’s latest work Negotiating Capability and Diaspora: A Philosophical Politics is a bold attempt to examine the intellectual philosophies of Amartya Sen, John Rawls, Sri Aurobindo, and a host of other thinkers. The book starts with Sen’s Conglomerate Theory from his masterpiece The Idea of Justice, but it is primarily focused on his theory of capability in relation to Rawls’s theory of primary goods. However, the book broadens its coverage by generously including the ideas of other important philosophers and also some selected works of literature. One can hardly forget Khasnabish’s strong focus on the East-West dialogue in her argument. Although the work toys liberally with 'philosophical politics,' it remains firmly centered on Amartya Sen, the economist-philosopher. Undoubtedly, its deeper and broader philosophical base is much more intriguing and challenging. Indeed, it is a very valuable and commendable work in the history of ideas.” -- K.D. Verma, University of Pittsburgh-Johnstown
Table of ContentsPreface Part 1: Philosophy Chapter 1: Conglomerate Theory Chapter 2: Beyond John Rawls: from Primary Goods to Capability Chapter 3: Capability via Aurobindo and Appiah Chapter 4: Capability Theorem through Nussbaum: East versus West Part 2: Literature Chapter 5: Sea of Poppies: A Diasporic Construct Chapter 6: Political Sublime Revisited Through The Namesake Chapter 7: The Power of Capability in Morrison’s Beloved Chapter 8: Conclusion: A Philosophical Politics Postscript
