Description
Book SynopsisIn Naturally Free Action, Oisín Deery argues that free will exists, where free will is understood as the ability to act freely, and free actions as exercises of that ability.Deery reaches his conclusion by showing how the concept of free will plausibly refers to many actual human behaviors, and how these behaviors count as a natural category or kind. Deery also addresses the role of phenomenology in fixing the reference of the concept, arguing that our phenomenology as of deciding or acting freely is typically accurate, even if determinism is true. The result is a realist, naturalistic framework for theorizing about free will, according to which free will almost certainly exists and we act freely. Deery''s position mostly sidesteps the question of whether free will is compatible with determinism. Even so, Deery maintains that his natural-kind view about free will supports compatibilism and provides compatibilists with an attractive way to be realists about free will.Deery also responds to recent empirical threats to free will, including those posed by findings about behaviors caused by implicit biases. Finally, Deery shows how his view possesses the resources to address emerging questions about whether artificially intelligent agents might ever act freely or be responsible for their behaviors, and if so in what sense.
Trade Review[Harris] documents in meticulous detail, with great sensitivity and unswerving impartiality, how Chomsky's early theories captured the imagination of the new generation cognitive scientists and resulted in the overthrow of Bloomfieldian linguistics and behaviourist psychology more generally. He explains the elegance of 'deep structure' and the power of Chomsky's conception of language as expounded in the 'standard theory', and then shows how a disparate group of young scholars, the generative semanticists, effectively hijacked the fledgling theory and developed it in ways so radical that Chomsky soon came to be seen as a reactionary fighting a rearguard action against the forces of progress. . . .I can vouch for the accuracy and fairness of Harris's dissection. . . .Harris has achieved the near impossible: being fair to both sides in a civil war. * Neil Smith, Nature *
In this delightful and rich book, Deery makes the strongest case to date for the important idea that Free Action is a natural kind, and he deftly argues that this can provide a novel ground for compatibilism. It is one of the most interesting books on free will to appear in the last decade. * Shaun Nichols, Cornell University *
An impressive, scientifically well-informed contribution to the philosophical literature on free will. Deery's approach to investigating free will is fresh, and he presents his ideas with great clarity. Highly recommended to anyone with more than a passing interest in free will. * Alfred R. Mele, Florida State University *
Drawing on an astonishingly wide-ranging swath of recent developments in philosophical work on language, perception, causation, metaphysics, and psychology, Deery makes an original and powerful case for the reality of an empirically credible picture of free action. This is a model for 21st century work on free will. * Manuel Vargas, University of California, San Diego *
This elegantly written and forcefully argued book presents a strikingly novel version of the view that human free will is real. The book is a major contribution to the philosophical literature on free will. * Terry Horgan, University of Arizona *
Table of ContentsIntroduction Part 1: Concept and Reference 1: Methodology and free will 2: Naturally free action 3: Reference, error, naturalism Part 2: Phenomenology 4: Is free-agency phenomenology accurate? 5: Preserving preservationism (about free will) 6: Free-agency experience and belief Conclusion
