Description
Book SynopsisAt the turn of the twentieth century, the United States and Germany emerged as the two most rapidly developing industrial nation-states of the Atlantic world. The elites and intelligentsias of both countries staked out claims to dominance in the twentieth century. In Militarism in a Global Age, Dirk Bonker explores the far-reaching ambitions of naval officers before World War I as they advanced navalism, a particular brand of modern militarism that stressed the paramount importance of sea power as a historical determinant. Aspiring to make their own countries into self-reliant world powers in an age of global empire and commerce, officers viewed the causes of the industrial nation, global influence, elite rule, and naval power as inseparable. Characterized by both transnational exchanges and national competition, the new maritime militarism was technocratic in its impulses; its makers cast themselves as members of a professional elite that served the nation with its expert knowledge
Trade Review
Bönker's study expands significantly on recent work that interprets the kaiser's navy in a nonexceptionalist framework, stressing global dynamics rather than the peculiarities of modern Germany: the kaiserreich was not a unique case; its navy was not the expression of special conditions, as Eckart Kehr, Volker R. Berghahn, and Hans-Ulrich Wehler had argued. However, Bönker does not overstretch this interpretation. His study is far too much informed by meticulous archival research and an awareness of the specific historical contexts on both sides of the Atlantic for him to embrace the revisionist interpretation wholeheartedly.
* American Historical Review *
In American history, it is often taught that while the great powers of Europe were engaged in an arms race... the U.S. remained aloof and relatively sane by comparison. A modest but growing number of historians dispute this view, particularly the notion of U.S. detachment. Bönker is one of those and presents undeniable evidence that the US was anything but aloof. This evidence comes from the planners and strategists themselves, whom Bönker quotes heavily.... The parallels are striking; at times, the US desire for worldwide dominance surpasses the aims of Imperial Germany.
* Choice *
Table of ContentsIntroduction: Maritime Militarism in Two Modern Nation-StatesPart I. Military Force, National Industry, and Global Politics: Naval Strategies of World Power
1. World Power in a Global Age
2. Big-Power Confrontations over Empire
3. Maritime Force, Threat, and WarPart II. The Cult of the Battle: Approaches to Maritime Warfare
4. War of Battle Fleets
5. Planning for Victory
6. Commerce, Law, and the Limitation of WarPart III. The Quest for Power: The Navy, Governance, and the Nation
7. Naval Elites and the State
8. Manufacturing Consent
9. A Politics of Social ImperialismPart IV. A Militarism of Experts: Naval Professionalism and the Making of Navalism
10. Of Sciences, Sea Power, and Strategy
11. Between Leadership and Intraservice ConflictConclusion: Navalism and Its TrajectoriesNotes
Bibliography
Index
