Description
Book SynopsisThis is an accessible analysis of justice in the contemporary world. It introduces the moral debates around issues such as immigration, national self-determination and cultural rights, as well as resource transfers between generations and from rich to poor countries, through the lenses of liberalism, communitarianism, libertarianism and feminism.
Trade Review"[
Justice in a Changing World] is a remarkably engaged introduction of cutting-edge theoretical debates on social justice which demonstrates how normative arguments in political theory engage with pressing issues in contemporary politics ... Fabre succeeds in bringing out the nuances and complexities of each issue, helpfully guiding the reader through the debate but showing that there is no easy answer. This is an excellent starting point for anyone wishing to learn more about the subject."
Political Studies Review
"Reading Fabre’s book is an excellent way to learn the subject. It is accessibly written, but comprehensive, and especially good on the contemporary issues of international and multicultural justice."
Harry Brighouse, University of Wisconsin
"In Justice in a Changing World, Cécile Fabre deftly combines a clear discussion of current debates about justice with a presentation of their stringent application to some of the most pressing and intractable problems in contemporary politics. Both analytical and engaged, this is a first-rate introduction to a major area of political theory. All those interested in the topic can learn a great deal from this book."
Matthew Festenstein, University of York
Table of ContentsChapter 1 Setting the stage.
1. Introduction.
2. Egalitarian liberalism.
2.1. Rawls’ Theory of Justice.
2.2. Egalitarian liberalism post Rawls I: luck egalitarianism.
2.3. Egalitarian liberalism post Rawls I: sufficientism.
3. The communitarian critique of Rawls: individuals and communities.
4. The libertarian critique of Rawls: justice as entitlements.
5. Themes and issues.
Chapter 2 Justice towards future generations.
1. Introduction.
2. Egalitarian liberalism and future generations.
2.1. Rawls’ just savings principle.
2.2. Luck egalitarianism.
2.3. Sufficiency.
3. The transgenerational community: a source of obligations to our successors.
4. Libertarianism and future generations.
5. Two objections to obligations to future generations.
5.1. Rights, obligations, and non-existing people.
5.2. The non-identity objection.
6. Conclusion.
Chapter 3 Multiculturalism .
1. Introduction.
2. An egalitarian liberal position: Kymlicka’s defence of minority rights.
3. Communitarianism and minorities.
4. A libertarian position: Kukathas’ liberal archipelago.
5. Conclusion.
Chapter 4 National self-determination.
1. Introduction.
2. Liberal nationalism.
3. Communitarianism and national self-determination.
4. Libertarianism and national self-determination.
5. Conclusion.
Chapter 5 Global distributive justice .
1. Introduction.
2. Egalitarian liberalism and global distributive justice.
2.1. Luck egalitarianism, sufficientism and the irrelevance of borders.
2.2. Egalitarian liberalism and the moral relevance of borders I: Rawls’s.
Law of Peoples.
2.3. Egalitarian liberalism and the moral relevance of borders II: Nagel’s.
political conception of justice.
3. Communitarianism and global distributive justice.
4. Libertarianism and global distributive justice.
5. Conclusion.
Chapter 6 Immigration .
1. Introduction.
2. An egalitarian liberal case for relatively open borders.
2.1. A Rawlsian view on immigration.
2.2. Egalitarian liberal arguments for open borders.
2.3. Open borders and distributive justice: sufficiency and immigration.
3. A communitarian position: Walzer on immigration.
4. A libertarian position: Hillel Steiner on immigration.
5. Who should take in immigrants?.
6. Conclusion.
Chapter 7 Reparation for past injustices.
1. Introduction.
2. Egalitarian liberalism and reparative justice.
2.1. Luck egalitarianism, sufficientism, and reparations.
2.2. Refining the egalitarian liberal position.
3. Communitarianism and reparations.
3.1. The transgenerational community: in defence of reparations.
3.2. Judging the past: a very limited defence of reparations.
4. Libertarianism and reparations.
5. Conclusion.
.
Conclusion.
Works cited
