Description

Book Synopsis
As a central provision of the substantive insolvency law, § 103 of the InsO [Insolvency Statute] is of great practical importance. When an insolvency proceeding is opened, the insolvency administrator is often required to decide on the type of settlement for a number of mutual "provisional" contracts, meaning contracts not completely fulfilled by any party. This applies in particular for company insolvencies. In the past, the insolvency administrator's right of election was already a common subject matter of scholarly works. However, only the legal position within the insolvency proceeding stood at the center of these investigations. Therefore, the goal of the present work is the investigation of the legal position existing between the parties to the contract after the insolvency proceeding is cancelled either after complete final distribution or after an insolvency plan comes into effect. The starting point is the fundamentally tense relationship between the contractual law of obligations and substantive insolvency law, and the associated question regarding the effects of the opening of the proceeding on the claims for fulfillment that are still open. The author presents the problems that arise with the application of the latest BGH [German Federal Supreme Court] judicature, according to which the opening of the proceeding affects only the "enforceability" of the claims for fulfillment, and offers solution recommendations. Particularly relevant in practice are the difficulties that result from the renunciation of the "forfeiture theory" when the insolvency reorganization plans go into effect.

Table of Contents
A)Gegenstand der Arbeit · B)Behandlung gegenseitiger Austauschverträge in der Insolvenz nach § 103 InsO · C)Wirkung der Verfahrenseröffnung und Wahlrechtsausübung bzw. -verwirkung auf gegenseitige „schwebende“ Verträge · D)Auswirkungen des Wahlrechts auf die Rechtslage nach Aufhebung des Verfahrens infolge vollzogener Schlussverteilung gem. § 200 Abs. 1 InsO · E)Auswirkungen des Wahlrechts auf die Rechtslage nach Aufhebung des Verfahrens infolge rechtskräftigen Insolvenzplans gem. § 258 Abs. 1 InsO · F)Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse

Gegenseitige Verträge nach Aufhebung des

    Product form

    £95.00

    Includes FREE delivery

    RRP £100.00 – you save £5.00 (5%)

    Order before 4pm today for delivery by Tue 30 Jun 2026.

    A Hardback by Thomas Rühle

      Trusted by thousands of customers. See 2,385+ Customer Reviews

      View other formats and editions of Gegenseitige Verträge nach Aufhebung des by Thomas Rühle

      Publisher: De Gruyter
      Publication Date: 15/03/2006
      ISBN13: 9783899493030, 978-3899493030
      ISBN10: 3899493036

      Description

      Book Synopsis
      As a central provision of the substantive insolvency law, § 103 of the InsO [Insolvency Statute] is of great practical importance. When an insolvency proceeding is opened, the insolvency administrator is often required to decide on the type of settlement for a number of mutual "provisional" contracts, meaning contracts not completely fulfilled by any party. This applies in particular for company insolvencies. In the past, the insolvency administrator's right of election was already a common subject matter of scholarly works. However, only the legal position within the insolvency proceeding stood at the center of these investigations. Therefore, the goal of the present work is the investigation of the legal position existing between the parties to the contract after the insolvency proceeding is cancelled either after complete final distribution or after an insolvency plan comes into effect. The starting point is the fundamentally tense relationship between the contractual law of obligations and substantive insolvency law, and the associated question regarding the effects of the opening of the proceeding on the claims for fulfillment that are still open. The author presents the problems that arise with the application of the latest BGH [German Federal Supreme Court] judicature, according to which the opening of the proceeding affects only the "enforceability" of the claims for fulfillment, and offers solution recommendations. Particularly relevant in practice are the difficulties that result from the renunciation of the "forfeiture theory" when the insolvency reorganization plans go into effect.

      Table of Contents
      A)Gegenstand der Arbeit · B)Behandlung gegenseitiger Austauschverträge in der Insolvenz nach § 103 InsO · C)Wirkung der Verfahrenseröffnung und Wahlrechtsausübung bzw. -verwirkung auf gegenseitige „schwebende“ Verträge · D)Auswirkungen des Wahlrechts auf die Rechtslage nach Aufhebung des Verfahrens infolge vollzogener Schlussverteilung gem. § 200 Abs. 1 InsO · E)Auswirkungen des Wahlrechts auf die Rechtslage nach Aufhebung des Verfahrens infolge rechtskräftigen Insolvenzplans gem. § 258 Abs. 1 InsO · F)Zusammenfassung der Ergebnisse

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account