Description

Book Synopsis
W. V. Quine’s “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, first published in 1951, is one of the most influential articles in the history of analytic philosophy. It does not just question central semantic and epistemological views of logical positivism and early analytic philosophy, it also marks a momentous challenge to the ideas that conceptual analysis is a main task of philosophy and that philosophy is an a priori discipline which differs in principle from the empirical sciences. These ideas dominated early analytic philosophy, but similar views are to be found in the Kantian tradition, in phenomenology and in philosophical hermeneutics. In questioning this consensus from the perspective of a radical empiricism, Quine’s article has had a sustained and lasting impact across all these philosophical divisions. Quine himself moved from the abandonment of the analytic/synthetic distinction to a thoroughgoing naturalism, and many analytic philosophers have followed his lead. The current collection differs from other anthologies devoted to Quine in two respects. On the one hand, it focuses on his attack on analyticity, apriority and necessity; on the other, it considers implications of that attack that far transcend the limits of Quine scholarship, and lie at the heart of the current self-understanding of philosophy. The contributors include both opponents and proponents of the dichotomies attacked by Quine. Furthermore, they include both eminent figures such as Boghossian, Burge, and Davidson, and up and coming younger philosophers.

Table of Contents
Introduction Herbert SCHNÄDELBACH: Two Dogmas of Empiricism – 50 Years After Analyticity Revisited Paul BOGHOSSIAN: Reflections on Analyticity Verena MAYER: Implicit Thoughts. Kant, Frege and Quine and Analytic Propositions Christian NIMTZ: Analytical Truths – Still Harmless after all These Years Kathrin GLÜER: Analyticity and Implicit Definition Åsa Maria WIKFORSS: An a posteriori Conception of Analyticity? Necessity, Synonymy, and Logic Hans-Johann GLOCK: The Linguistic Doctrine Revisited Peter PAGIN: Quine and the Problem of Synonymy Tyler BURGE: Logic and Analyticity “Two Dogmas” and Beyond Geert KEIL: “Science Itself Teaches”. A Fresh Look at Quine’s Naturalistic Metaphilosophy Donald DAVIDSON: Quine’s Externalism

Fifty Years of Quine’s Two Dogmas

    Product form

    £104.81

    Includes FREE delivery

    Order before 4pm today for delivery by Mon 22 Jun 2026.

    A Paperback by Hans-Johann Glock, Kathrin Glüer, Geert Keil

    Out of stock

      Trusted by thousands of customers. See 2,385+ Customer Reviews

      View other formats and editions of Fifty Years of Quine’s Two Dogmas by Hans-Johann Glock

      Publisher: Brill
      Publication Date: 01/01/2003
      ISBN13: 9789042009486, 978-9042009486
      ISBN10:

      Description

      Book Synopsis
      W. V. Quine’s “Two Dogmas of Empiricism”, first published in 1951, is one of the most influential articles in the history of analytic philosophy. It does not just question central semantic and epistemological views of logical positivism and early analytic philosophy, it also marks a momentous challenge to the ideas that conceptual analysis is a main task of philosophy and that philosophy is an a priori discipline which differs in principle from the empirical sciences. These ideas dominated early analytic philosophy, but similar views are to be found in the Kantian tradition, in phenomenology and in philosophical hermeneutics. In questioning this consensus from the perspective of a radical empiricism, Quine’s article has had a sustained and lasting impact across all these philosophical divisions. Quine himself moved from the abandonment of the analytic/synthetic distinction to a thoroughgoing naturalism, and many analytic philosophers have followed his lead. The current collection differs from other anthologies devoted to Quine in two respects. On the one hand, it focuses on his attack on analyticity, apriority and necessity; on the other, it considers implications of that attack that far transcend the limits of Quine scholarship, and lie at the heart of the current self-understanding of philosophy. The contributors include both opponents and proponents of the dichotomies attacked by Quine. Furthermore, they include both eminent figures such as Boghossian, Burge, and Davidson, and up and coming younger philosophers.

      Table of Contents
      Introduction Herbert SCHNÄDELBACH: Two Dogmas of Empiricism – 50 Years After Analyticity Revisited Paul BOGHOSSIAN: Reflections on Analyticity Verena MAYER: Implicit Thoughts. Kant, Frege and Quine and Analytic Propositions Christian NIMTZ: Analytical Truths – Still Harmless after all These Years Kathrin GLÜER: Analyticity and Implicit Definition Åsa Maria WIKFORSS: An a posteriori Conception of Analyticity? Necessity, Synonymy, and Logic Hans-Johann GLOCK: The Linguistic Doctrine Revisited Peter PAGIN: Quine and the Problem of Synonymy Tyler BURGE: Logic and Analyticity “Two Dogmas” and Beyond Geert KEIL: “Science Itself Teaches”. A Fresh Look at Quine’s Naturalistic Metaphilosophy Donald DAVIDSON: Quine’s Externalism

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account