Description

Book Synopsis
Reproductive justice (RJ) is a pivotal movement that supplants the language and limitations of reproductive rights. RJ''s tenets are that women have the human rights to decide if or when they''ll become pregnant, whether to carry a pregnancy to term, and to parent the children they have in safe and healthy environments. Recognizing the importance of the rights at stake when the law addresses parenting and procreation, the authors in this book re-imagine judicial opinions that address the law''s treatment of pregnancy and parenting. The cases cover topics such as forced sterilization, pregnancy discrimination, criminal penalties for women who take illegal drugs while pregnant, and state funding for abortion. Though some of the re-imagined cases come to the same conclusions as the originals, each rewritten opinion analyzes how these cases impact the most vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities, poor women, and women of color.

Table of Contents
Part I. Introduction Kimberly Mutcherson; Part II: The Feminist Judgments; 1. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) Jasmine E. Harris and Kim Hai Pearson; 2. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942) Radhika Rao and Thomas Williams; 3. Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971) Michele Gilman and Priscilla Ocen; 4. Maher v. Roe, 432 US 464 (1977) Ederlina Co and Michele Goodwin; 5. In Re Madyun, 114 Daily wash. Law. Rptr. 2233 (D.C. Super Ct. 1986) Farah Diaz-Tello and Maya Manian; 6. Johnson v. Calvert, 5 Cal. 4th 84 (1993) Cathy Sakimura and Melanie Jacobs; 7. Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2000) Lisa Crooms-Robinson and Margo Kaplan; 8. State v. Oakley, 245 Wis. 2d 447 (2001) Aziza Ahmed and Solangel Maldonado; 9. Sojourner A. v. N.J. Dep't of Human Servs., 177 N.J. 318 Ann Cammett and Cynthia Soohoo; 10. K.M. v. E.G., 37 Cal. 4th 130 (2005) Nancy Polikoff and Melissa Murray; 11. Reber v. Reiss, 42 A.3d 1131 (2012) Kevin Maillard and Dara Purvis; 12. Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. – -, 133 S. Ct. 2552 (2013) Rose Cuison Villazor and Nancy Dowd; 13. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. __ (2014) Suzanne A. Kim and Anthony Michael Kreis; 14. Young v. UPS, 575 U.S. __ (2015) Mary Ziegler and Meredith Harbach; 15. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt Myrisha Lewis and David Cohen; Index.

Feminist Judgments Reproductive Justice Rewritten

    Product form

    £41.79

    Includes FREE delivery

    RRP £43.99 – you save £2.20 (5%)

    Order before 4pm tomorrow for delivery by Wed 1 Jul 2026.

    A Paperback by Kimberly M. Mutcherson

    15 in stock

      Trusted by thousands of customers. See 2,385+ Customer Reviews

      View other formats and editions of Feminist Judgments Reproductive Justice Rewritten by Kimberly M. Mutcherson

      Publisher: Cambridge University Press
      Publication Date: 16/01/2020
      ISBN13: 9781108442350, 978-1108442350
      ISBN10:

      Description

      Book Synopsis
      Reproductive justice (RJ) is a pivotal movement that supplants the language and limitations of reproductive rights. RJ''s tenets are that women have the human rights to decide if or when they''ll become pregnant, whether to carry a pregnancy to term, and to parent the children they have in safe and healthy environments. Recognizing the importance of the rights at stake when the law addresses parenting and procreation, the authors in this book re-imagine judicial opinions that address the law''s treatment of pregnancy and parenting. The cases cover topics such as forced sterilization, pregnancy discrimination, criminal penalties for women who take illegal drugs while pregnant, and state funding for abortion. Though some of the re-imagined cases come to the same conclusions as the originals, each rewritten opinion analyzes how these cases impact the most vulnerable populations, including people with disabilities, poor women, and women of color.

      Table of Contents
      Part I. Introduction Kimberly Mutcherson; Part II: The Feminist Judgments; 1. Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) Jasmine E. Harris and Kim Hai Pearson; 2. Skinner v. Oklahoma, 316 U.S. 535 (1942) Radhika Rao and Thomas Williams; 3. Wyman v. James, 400 U.S. 309 (1971) Michele Gilman and Priscilla Ocen; 4. Maher v. Roe, 432 US 464 (1977) Ederlina Co and Michele Goodwin; 5. In Re Madyun, 114 Daily wash. Law. Rptr. 2233 (D.C. Super Ct. 1986) Farah Diaz-Tello and Maya Manian; 6. Johnson v. Calvert, 5 Cal. 4th 84 (1993) Cathy Sakimura and Melanie Jacobs; 7. Ferguson v. City of Charleston, 532 U.S. 67 (2000) Lisa Crooms-Robinson and Margo Kaplan; 8. State v. Oakley, 245 Wis. 2d 447 (2001) Aziza Ahmed and Solangel Maldonado; 9. Sojourner A. v. N.J. Dep't of Human Servs., 177 N.J. 318 Ann Cammett and Cynthia Soohoo; 10. K.M. v. E.G., 37 Cal. 4th 130 (2005) Nancy Polikoff and Melissa Murray; 11. Reber v. Reiss, 42 A.3d 1131 (2012) Kevin Maillard and Dara Purvis; 12. Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl, 570 U.S. – -, 133 S. Ct. 2552 (2013) Rose Cuison Villazor and Nancy Dowd; 13. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., 573 U.S. __ (2014) Suzanne A. Kim and Anthony Michael Kreis; 14. Young v. UPS, 575 U.S. __ (2015) Mary Ziegler and Meredith Harbach; 15. Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt Myrisha Lewis and David Cohen; Index.

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account