Description

Book Synopsis
In 1812 the Jeffersonian-dominated Massachusetts legislature, with the approval of Governor Elbridge Gerry, split Essex County in an effort to dilute the strength of the Federalists. Noting the resemblance of the new, oddly shaped district to a well-known amphibian, a local newspaper dubbed the creation a gerrymander. Less well known about this oft-recounted episode of American history, writes political scientist Mark Rush, is its outcome: in the ensuing election, the Federalists won the district anyway. Today, politically divisive redistrictinggerrymandering to somestill causes bitter reapportionment disputes, renewed threats of class action lawsuits, and legislative wrangling. In Does Redistricting Make a Difference? Rush offers a skeptical inquiry into this controversy and a critical assessment of the assumptions underlying current analyses of the redistricting process. He focuses on long-term voting results in redrawn districts and concludes that redistrictingat least given present criteria and guidelineshas little impact. By showing how difficult it is to perpetrate a successful partisan gerrymander, Rush challenges the notion that an electorate can be organized into Democratic and Republican groups. He further questions the validity of current political researchand highly paid political consultingundertaken on the assumption that such organization is feasible. Certain to provoke discussion and debate, Does Redistricting make a Difference? is a timely look at a topic as controversial today as it was in the days of Elbridge Gerry.

Trade Review
Does Redistricting Make a Difference?. . . provides evidence that the assumptions made by legal experts and political scientists regarding the possibility of, and the consequences from, partisan gerrymandering may be faulty. It raises serious theoretical questions about concepts such as "fair representation" and "politically relevant groups." * American Political Science Review *

Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction: Defining the Gerrymander Chapter 2 The Court's Approach to Gerrymandering and Representation Chapter 3 The Political Science Model of Voting Behavior and Its Importance for Redistricting Analysis Chapter 4 Theories and Methods of Gerrymandering Analysis Chapter 5 The States as Political Units Chapter 6 The Impact of Redistricting and Incumbency on Voting Behavior Chapter 7 Conclusion: Political Science, Representation, and Politics

Does Redistricting Make a Difference

    Product form

    £36.00

    Includes FREE delivery

    RRP £40.00 – you save £4.00 (10%)

    Order before 4pm today for delivery by Wed 17 Jun 2026.

    A Paperback by Mark E. Rush

    Out of stock


      View other formats and editions of Does Redistricting Make a Difference by Mark E. Rush

      Publisher: Rlpg/Galleys
      Publication Date: 9/26/2000 12:00:00 AM
      ISBN13: 9780739101926, 978-0739101926
      ISBN10: 0739101927

      Description

      Book Synopsis
      In 1812 the Jeffersonian-dominated Massachusetts legislature, with the approval of Governor Elbridge Gerry, split Essex County in an effort to dilute the strength of the Federalists. Noting the resemblance of the new, oddly shaped district to a well-known amphibian, a local newspaper dubbed the creation a gerrymander. Less well known about this oft-recounted episode of American history, writes political scientist Mark Rush, is its outcome: in the ensuing election, the Federalists won the district anyway. Today, politically divisive redistrictinggerrymandering to somestill causes bitter reapportionment disputes, renewed threats of class action lawsuits, and legislative wrangling. In Does Redistricting Make a Difference? Rush offers a skeptical inquiry into this controversy and a critical assessment of the assumptions underlying current analyses of the redistricting process. He focuses on long-term voting results in redrawn districts and concludes that redistrictingat least given present criteria and guidelineshas little impact. By showing how difficult it is to perpetrate a successful partisan gerrymander, Rush challenges the notion that an electorate can be organized into Democratic and Republican groups. He further questions the validity of current political researchand highly paid political consultingundertaken on the assumption that such organization is feasible. Certain to provoke discussion and debate, Does Redistricting make a Difference? is a timely look at a topic as controversial today as it was in the days of Elbridge Gerry.

      Trade Review
      Does Redistricting Make a Difference?. . . provides evidence that the assumptions made by legal experts and political scientists regarding the possibility of, and the consequences from, partisan gerrymandering may be faulty. It raises serious theoretical questions about concepts such as "fair representation" and "politically relevant groups." * American Political Science Review *

      Table of Contents
      Chapter 1 Introduction: Defining the Gerrymander Chapter 2 The Court's Approach to Gerrymandering and Representation Chapter 3 The Political Science Model of Voting Behavior and Its Importance for Redistricting Analysis Chapter 4 Theories and Methods of Gerrymandering Analysis Chapter 5 The States as Political Units Chapter 6 The Impact of Redistricting and Incumbency on Voting Behavior Chapter 7 Conclusion: Political Science, Representation, and Politics

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account