Description
Book SynopsisHuman rights complaints attract a great deal of public interest, but what is going on below the surface? When people contact a human rights lawyer, how do they think about and use human rights discourse? How are complaints turned into cases? Can administrative systems be both effective and fair? Defining Rights and Wrongs investigates the day-to-day practices of low-level officials and intermediaries as they construct domestic human rights complaints. It identifies the values that a human rights system should uphold if it is to promote mutual respect and foster the personal dignity and equal rights of citizens.
Trade ReviewIt is a short book … but one which punches beyond its weight … She firmly grounds the debate about human rights and their domestic enforcement in her analysis of the empirical data and the social reality of public administration … Her book is an admirable and pithy contribution which offers much to those interested in human rights, discrimination, public administration and administrative justice. -- Simon Halliday, University of Strathclyde * Law and Politics Book Review, Vol. 18, No.4 *
Table of ContentsAcknowledgments
Introduction
1 An Overview of Public Administration of Human Rights Enforcement in Canada
2 The Roles of Frontline Staff and Independent Lawyers in the Public Administration of Human Rights Enforcement
3 Transforming Human Rights Complaints into Cases
4 Publics, Counterpublics, and the Public Interest
Conclusion
Appendix: Excerpts from the Ontario Human Rights Code
Notes; Bibliography; Index
