Description

Book Synopsis

Dead Certainty is about the challenge of judging matters of public concern without a common sense of the good or other shared criteria that validate final decisions. Examining both the philosophical and the practical aspects of this challenge, this book focuses on United States Supreme Court opinions that authorize and regulate the practice of sentencing people to death. Unlike other books that discuss capital punishment, it does not argue for or against the death penalty. Instead, Dead Certainty contributes to a larger project in contemporary political and legal philosophy: re-imagining how people in today''s world give coherence and meaning to their shared experience. Culbert''s work will be of interest to scholars of political theory, jurisprudence, law and society, rhetoric, continental philosophy, and ethics.



Trade Review
"Dead Certainty is one of the most interesting and original treatments of capital punishment I have read in a long time. Culbert offers a philosophically compelling account of the Supreme Court's ongoing struggle to legitimate capital punishment. In her view, this struggle reveals important things about the nature of judgment itself and about the Court's attempt to ground capital punishment outside a framework of judgment." —Austin Sarat, Amherst College
"In this book [Culbert] uses the Supreme Court's capital punishment jurisprudence as a vehicle to study 'the problem of judgment,' an inquiry that dissects the language and methodologies used by the justices in their evolving efforts to legitimate decisions resulting in the penalty of death Culbert's thesis is complex, her frame of reference novel, and her thoughts run deep." —James R. Acker, School of Criminal Justice, University at Albany

Table of Contents
CONTENTS Acknowledgments 1. Judgment and Metaphysics: American Capital Punishment Jurisprudence and Friedrich Nietzsche's History of an Error 2. The Promise of Reliability and the Twin Objectives of the Capital Punishment System 3. The Consolation of Common Sense in the Regulation of Capital Punishment 4. The Cockcrow of Positivism: "Normal" Culpability in Capital Punishment Jurisprudence 5. The Impact of Payne: The Return of Sense to Capital Punishment Jurisprudence 6. The End of Error: DNA Technology and the Decision Not to Decide in Capital Cases 7. The Experience of Judgment Notes Bibliography Index

Dead Certainty

    Product form

    £18.89

    Includes FREE delivery

    RRP £20.99 – you save £2.10 (10%)

    Order before 4pm today for delivery by Thu 6 Aug 2026.

    A Paperback / softback by Jennifer L. Culbert

    Out of stock

      Trusted by thousands of customers. See 2,385+ Customer Reviews

      View other formats and editions of Dead Certainty by Jennifer L. Culbert

      Publisher: Stanford University Press
      Publication Date: Publication Date: 20/12/2007
      ISBN13: 9780804757461, 978-0804757461
      ISBN10: 0804757461

      Description

      Book Synopsis

      Dead Certainty is about the challenge of judging matters of public concern without a common sense of the good or other shared criteria that validate final decisions. Examining both the philosophical and the practical aspects of this challenge, this book focuses on United States Supreme Court opinions that authorize and regulate the practice of sentencing people to death. Unlike other books that discuss capital punishment, it does not argue for or against the death penalty. Instead, Dead Certainty contributes to a larger project in contemporary political and legal philosophy: re-imagining how people in today''s world give coherence and meaning to their shared experience. Culbert''s work will be of interest to scholars of political theory, jurisprudence, law and society, rhetoric, continental philosophy, and ethics.



      Trade Review
      "Dead Certainty is one of the most interesting and original treatments of capital punishment I have read in a long time. Culbert offers a philosophically compelling account of the Supreme Court's ongoing struggle to legitimate capital punishment. In her view, this struggle reveals important things about the nature of judgment itself and about the Court's attempt to ground capital punishment outside a framework of judgment." —Austin Sarat, Amherst College
      "In this book [Culbert] uses the Supreme Court's capital punishment jurisprudence as a vehicle to study 'the problem of judgment,' an inquiry that dissects the language and methodologies used by the justices in their evolving efforts to legitimate decisions resulting in the penalty of death Culbert's thesis is complex, her frame of reference novel, and her thoughts run deep." —James R. Acker, School of Criminal Justice, University at Albany

      Table of Contents
      CONTENTS Acknowledgments 1. Judgment and Metaphysics: American Capital Punishment Jurisprudence and Friedrich Nietzsche's History of an Error 2. The Promise of Reliability and the Twin Objectives of the Capital Punishment System 3. The Consolation of Common Sense in the Regulation of Capital Punishment 4. The Cockcrow of Positivism: "Normal" Culpability in Capital Punishment Jurisprudence 5. The Impact of Payne: The Return of Sense to Capital Punishment Jurisprudence 6. The End of Error: DNA Technology and the Decision Not to Decide in Capital Cases 7. The Experience of Judgment Notes Bibliography Index

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account