Description
Book SynopsisTable of ContentsA Note from the Series Editor xiii
Acknowledgments xv
Author Biography xvii
1 The Critical Role of Risk, High Concern, and Crisis Communication 1
1.1 Case Diary: A Collision of Facts and Perceptions 2
1.2 What Will Readers Find in This Book? 3
1.3 Why You Will Use This Book 4
1.4 The Need for This Book – Now 5
1.4.1 New Literature, New Research 5
1.4.2 Changes in the Communications Landscape 6
1.4.3 Changes in Journalism and the Perception of Facts 7
1.4.4 Changes in Laws, Regulations, and Societal Expectations 7
1.4.5 Changes in Concerns about Health, Safety, and the Environment 7
1.4.6 Changes in Levels of Trust 7
1.4.7 Changes in the Global Political Environment 8
1.4.8 The COVID- 19 Pandemic and the Changed Communication Landscape 8
2 Core Concepts 11
2.1 Case Diary: Recognizing Change as a High Concern Issue 11
2.2 Defining the Concept and Term Risk 13
2.3 Defining the Concept and Term Risk Communication 14
2.4 Risk Communication and Its Relationship to Risk Analysis 17
2.5 Defining the Concepts and Terms High Concern and High Concern Communication 19
2.6 Defining the Concept and Term Crisis 22
2.7 Defining the Concept and Term Crisis Communication 24
2.8 Chapter Resources 25
Endnotes 31
3 An Overview of Risk Communication 33
3.1 Case Diary: Complex Issues Destroy Homes 33
3.2 Challenges and Difficulties Faced in Communicating Risk Information 35
3.2.1 Characteristics and Limitations of Scientific and Technical Data about Risks 35
3.2.2 Characteristics and Limitations of Spokespersons in Communicating Information about Risks 35
3.2.2.1 Case Study: “Go Hard, Go Early”: Risk Communication Lessons from New Zealand’s Response to COVID-19 37
3.2.3 Characteristics and Limitations of Risk Management Regulations and Standards 41
3.2.3.1 Debates and Disagreements 41
3.2.3.2 Limited Resources for Risk Assessment and Management 41
3.2.3.3 Underestimating the Difficulty of and Need for Risk Communication 42
3.2.3.4 Lack of Coordination and Collaboration 42
3.2.4 Characteristics and Limitations of Traditional Media Channels in Communicating Information about Risks 42
3.2.5 Characteristics and Limitations of Social Media Channels in Communicating Information about Risks 43
3.2.6 Characteristics and Limitations of People in their Ability to Evaluate and Interpret Risk Information 44
3.3 Changes in How the Brain Processes Information Under Conditions of High Stress 48
3.4 Risk Communication Theory 49
3.4.1 Trust Determination Theory 49
3.4.2 Negative Dominance Theory 50
3.4.3 Mental Noise Theory 50
3.4.4 Risk Perception Theory 50
3.5 Risk Communication Principles and Guidelines 55
3.5.1 Principle 1. Accept and Involve All Interested and Affected Persons as Legitimate Partners 55
3.5.2 Principle 2. Plan Carefully and Evaluate Performance 55
3.5.3 Principle 3. Listen to Your Audience 57
3.5.4 Principle 4. Be Honest, Frank, and Open 57
3.5.5 Principle 5. Coordinate and Collaborate with Other Credible Sources 58
3.5.6 Principle 6. Meet the Needs of Traditional and Social Media 58
3.5.7 Principle 7. Speak Clearly and with Compassion 58
3.6 Key Takeaway Concepts and Conclusions from this Overview Chapter 59
3.7 Chapter Resources 59
Endnotes 66
4 Development of Risk Communication Theory and Practice 69
4.1 Case Diary: Origin Story 69
4.2 Introduction 70
4.2.1 Historical Phase 1: Presenting Risk Numbers 71
4.2.2 Historical Phase 2: Listening and Planning 71
4.2.3 Historical Phase 3: Stakeholder Engagement 72
4.2.4 Covello and Sandman’s Four Stages of Risk Communication 72
4.2.4.1 Stage 1: Ignore the Public 73
4.2.4.2 Stage 2: Explaining Risk Data Better 73
4.2.4.3 Stage 3: Stakeholder Engagement 77
4.2.4.4 Stage 4: Empowerment 78
4.3 Summary 79
4.4 Chapter Resources 79
Endnotes 83
5 Stakeholder Engagement and Empowerment 87
5.1 Case Diary: A Town Hall Public Meeting Goes Very Wrong 87
5.2 Introduction 89
5.3 Levels of Stakeholder Engagement 91
5.3.1 Types of Stakeholder Engagement 93
5.4 Benefits of Stakeholder Engagement 95
5.5 Limitations and Challenges of Stakeholder Engagement 96
5.6 Techniques and Approaches for Effective Stakeholder Engagement 97
5.7 Meetings with Stakeholders 100
5.7.1 Town Hall Meetings 101
5.7.2 Open House Meetings/Information Workshops 102
5.7.3 Tips for Meetings with Stakeholders 102
5.8 Chapter Resources 104
Endnotes 107
6 Communicating in a Crisis 111
6.1 Case Diary: The Challenge of Partnership in a Crisis 112
6.2 The Three Phases of a Crisis 113
6.3 Communication in the Precrisis Preparedness Phase 115
6.3.1 Precrisis Communication Activity: Identifying Potential Crises 117
6.3.2 Case Study: The 2010 BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill 118
6.3.3 Precrisis Communication Activity: Identify Goals and Objectives 120
6.3.4 Precrisis Communication Activity: Develop a Crisis Communication Plan 121
6.3.5 Precrisis Communication Activity: Identify, Train, and Test Crisis Communication Spokespersons 124
6.3.6 Precrisis Communication Activity: Engaging Stakeholders 124
6.3.7 Precrisis Communication Activity: Identifying Stakeholders’ Questions and Concerns 126
6.3.8 Drafting Messages for Anticipated Stakeholder Questions and Concerns 126
6.3.9 Precrisis Communication Activity: Conducting Exercises to Test the Crisis Communication Plan 128
6.3.10 Precrisis Communication Activity: Incident Command System (ICS) and the Joint Information Center (JIC) 129
6.4 Communications in the Crisis Response Phase 130
6.4.1 Case Study: Lac-Mégantic Rail Tragedy 134
6.4.2 Disaster and Emergency Warnings 136
6.4.2.1 Designing Effective Warnings 137
6.4.2.2 Steps in the Disaster and Emergency Warning Process 137
6.5 Communicating Effectively about Blame, Accountability, and Responsibility 139
6.6 Communicating an Apology 140
6.6.1 Case Study: Maple Leaf Foods and the Listeria Food Contamination Crisis 141
6.6.2 Case Study: Southwest Airlines Apology 144
6.7 Communications in the Postcrisis Recovery Phase 145
6.7.1 Case Study and Case Diary: New York City’s Communication Trials by Fire, from West Nile to 9/11 146
6.7.2 Case Study: Johnson & Johnson and the Tylenol Tampering Case 147
6.7.3 Case Study: Flint, Michigan and Contaminated Drinking Water 149
6.8 Chapter Resources 151
Endnotes 159
7 Foundational Principles: Perceptions, Biases, and Information Filters 165
7.1 Case Diary: “A” Is for “Apples” 165
7.2 Message Perception and Reception in High Concern Situations 168
7.3 Message Filter Theory: A Set of Principles Drawn from the Behavioral and Neuroscience Literature 169
7.4 Case Study: COVID- 19 and Risk Perception Factors 171
7.4.1 Social Amplification Filters 173
7.4.2 Mental Shortcut Filters 174
7.4.3 Knowledge and Belief Filters 176
7.4.4 Personality Filters 177
7.4.5 Negative Dominance/Loss Aversion Filters 177
7.5 Message Filters and the Brain 179
7.6 Message Filters, Perceptions, and Models of Human Behavior 179
7.7 Message Filters, Perceptions, and Persuasion 180
7.8 Message Filters, Perceptions, and Ethics 181
7.9 Message Filters and the Issue of Acceptable Risk 182
7.9.1 Factors in Determining Acceptable Risk 183
7.9.2 Strategies for Addressing Acceptable Risk 184
7.10 The Message is in the Mind of the Receiver 186
7.11 Chapter Resources 186
Endnotes 192
8 Foundational Principles: Trust, Culture, and Worldviews 197
8.1 Case Diary: A Disease Outbreak in Africa 198
8.2 Trust Determination 200
8.3 Characteristics and Attributes of Trust 201
8.3.1 Trust and First Impressions 203
8.3.2 Loss of Trust 204
8.3.3 Gaining Trust 206
8.3.3.1 Gaining Trust through Stakeholder Engagement 206
8.3.3.2 Gaining Trust through Trust Transference 206
8.3.3.3 Gaining Trust through Actions and Behavior 207
8.4 Case Study: Trust and the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant Accident 207
8.5 Case Diary: The Fukushima Japan Nuclear Power Plant Accident 208
8.6 Gaining Trust in High- Stakes Negotiations 210
8.7 Case Diary: Gaining Trust and the SARS Outbreak in Hong Kong 211
8.8 Trust and Culture 212
8.9 Cultural Competency 212
8.9.1 Different Communication Styles 213
8.9.2 Different Attitudes and Approaches toward Conflict 214
8.9.3 Different Nonverbal Communication 214
8.9.4 Different Attitudes and Approaches to Decision Making 214
8.9.5 Different Attitudes and Approaches toward Information Disclosure 215
8.9.6 Different Attitudes and Approaches to Knowing 215
8.9.7 Different Attitudes and Approaches toward Conversation and Discourse 215
8.9.8 Different Attitudes and Approaches toward the Use of Humor 215
8.10 Risk Perceptions, Trust, and Cultural Theory 215
8.11 Risk Perceptions, Trust, and Worldviews 217
8.12 Case Diary: Fame, Family, and Fear in Public Health Communications 218
8.13 Chapter Resources 221
Endnotes 227
9 Best Practices for Message Development in High Concern Situations 231
9.1 Case Diary: Mapping Through a Maze of COVID Confusion 231
9.2 Introduction 232
9.3 Crafting Messages in the Context of Stress and High Concern Decision- Making 233
9.3.1 Trust Determination and Messaging in High-Stress Situations 233
9.3.1.1 The CCO Best Practice 233
9.3.2 Impaired Comprehension and Messaging in High-Stress Situations 234
9.3.3 Negative Dominance and Messaging in High-Stress Situations 234
9.3.4 Emotional Impact and Messaging in High-Stress Situations 235
9.3.4.1 Case Study: Hoarding Toilet Paper at the Outset of the 2020 COVID-19 Pandemic 236
9.4 Message Mapping 238
9.4.1 Benefits of Message Maps 238
9.4.2 Message Maps and the Brain 241
9.4.3 The Development of Message Mapping 243
9.4.4 Case Study: Message Maps and Asbestos 244
9.4.5 Steps in Developing a Message Map 245
9.4.5.1 Step 1: Identify, Profile, and Prioritize Key Stakeholders 245
9.4.5.2 Step 2: Develop Lists of Stakeholder Questions and Concerns 248
9.4.5.3 Case Study: Stakeholder Questions, Terrorism, and Disasters 249
9.4.5.4 Step 3: Develop Key Messages 249
9.4.5.5 Step 4: Develop Supporting Information 252
9.4.5.6 Step 5: Testing the Message Map 253
9.4.5.7 Step 6: Repurpose Maps through Appropriate Information Channels 254
9.5 Summary 254
9.6 Chapter Resources 255
Endnotes 263
Appendices 265
Appendix 9.1 265
Appendix 9.2 267
Appendix 9.3 277
Appendix 9.4 280
10 Communicating Numbers, Statistics, and Technical Information about a Risk or Threat 285
10.1 Case Diary: A Civil Action 285
10.2 Introduction 288
10.3 Case Study: Numbers, Statistics, and COVID-19 289
10.4 Brain Processes That Filter How Technical Information about Risk or Threat Is Received and Understood 292
10.4.1 Risk and Threat Perception Filters 293
10.4.2 Thought Processing Filters 294
10.4.3 Mental Model Filters 294
10.4.4 Emotional Filters 295
10.4.5 Motivational Filters 295
10.5 Challenges in Explaining Technical Information About a Risk or Threat 296
10.6 Framing 297
10.7 Technical Jargon 298
10.8 Information Clarity 299
10.9 Units of Measurement 300
10.10 Case Study: Risk Numbers, Risk Statistics, and the Challenger Accident 303
10.11 Comparisons 304
10.12 Lessons Learned 308
10.13 Chapter Resources 308
Endnotes 315
11 Evaluating Risk, High Concern, and Crisis Communications 321
11.1 Case Diary: Finding the Road to Rio 321
11.1.1 The Mosquito Front 322
11.1.2 The Citizen Front 322
11.1.3 The Olympic Athlete and Visitor Front 323
11.1.4 Communication Strategy: The Citizen Front 323
11.1.5 Communication Strategy: Olympic Athlete and Visitor Front 323
11.2 Introduction 324
11.3 Benefits of Evaluation 326
11.4 Evaluation Practices for Risk, High Concern, and Crisis Communication 327
11.5 Case Studies of Evaluation Comparison to Best Practice: Hurricane Katrina, COVID-19
and Vaccination Hesitancy, and Outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China 329
11.5.1 Hurricane Katrina 329
11.5.2 COVID-19 and Vaccination Hesitancy 330
11.5.3 Outbreak of COVID-19 in Wuhan, China 330
11.6 Barriers and Challenges to Evaluation 332
11.6.1 Differences in Values 332
11.6.2 Differences in Goals 332
11.6.3 Competition for Resources 332
11.6.4 Ability to Learn from Results 333
11.7 Evaluation Measures 338
11.7.1 Process/Implementation Evaluation Measures 338
11.7.2 Outcome/Impact Evaluation Measures 339
11.7.3 Formative Evaluation Measures 340
11.8 An Integrated Approach to Evaluation 341
11.9 Resource: Case Study of Focus Group Testing of Mosquito-Control Messages, Florida, 2018–2019 342
11.10 Evaluation Tools 347
11.11 Chapter Resources 348
Endnotes 353
12 Communicating with Mainstream News Media 357
12.1 Case Diary: A High Stakes Chess Game with a News Media Outlet 357
12.2 Introduction 359
12.3 Characteristics of the Mainstream News Media 361
12.3.1 Content 361
12.3.2 Clarity 362
12.3.3 Avoiding Prejudice 362
12.3.4 Topicality 362
12.3.5 Diversity 363
12.3.6 Subject Matter Expertise 363
12.3.7 Resources 363
12.3.8 Career Advancement 364
12.3.9 Watchdogs 364
12.3.10 Amplifiers 364
12.3.11 Skepticism 364
12.3.12 Source Dependency 365
12.3.13 Professionalism and Independence 365
12.3.14 Covering Uncertainty 366
12.3.15 Legal Constraints 366
12.3.16 Special Populations 366
12.3.17 Competition 366
12.3.18 Confidentiality and Protection of Sources 367
12.3.19 Deadlines 367
12.3.20 Trust 367
12.3.21 Storytelling 368
12.3.22 Balance and Controversy 368
12.4 Guidelines and Best Practices for Interacting with Mainstream News Media 368
12.5 The Media Interview 370
12.6 Lessons and Trends 375
12.7 Case Diary: A Ten-Round Exercise 377
12.8 Chapter Resources 378
Endnotes 381
13 Social Media and the Changing Landscape for Risk, High Concern, and Crisis Communication 385
13.1 Case Diary: Myth-Busting: Mission Impossible? 385
13.2 Introduction 387
13.3 Benefits of Social Media Outlets for Risk, High Concern, and Crisis Communication 389
13.3.1 Speed 389
13.3.2 Access 390
13.3.3 Reach 390
13.3.4 Amplification 390
13.3.5 Transparency 390
13.3.6 Understanding 390
13.3.7 Changes in Behaviors 391
13.3.8 Relationship Building 391
13.3.9 Timeliness 391
13.3.10 Hyperlocal Specificity 391
13.3.11 Listening and Feedback 392
13.3.12 Taking Advantage of the Benefits of Social Media 392
13.4 Challenges of Social Media for Risk, High Concern, and Crisis Communication 393
13.4.1 Rising Expectations 393
13.4.2 Repostings/Redistribution 393
13.4.3 Permanent Storage 394
13.4.4 Hacking/Security 394
13.4.5 Rise and Fall of Social Media Platforms 394
13.4.6 Resources 394
13.4.7 Privacy and Confidentiality 394
13.4.8 Cognitive Overload 395
13.4.9 Players on the Field 395
13.4.10 Misinformation, Disinformation, and Rumors 395
13.5 Case Study: Social Media and the 2007 and 2011 Shooter Incidents at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) 397
13.6 Case Study: Social Media and the 2013 Southern Alberta/Calgary Flood 398
13.7 Best Practices for Using Social Media in Risk, High Concern, and Crisis Situations 400
13.7.1 Create a Social Media Plan 400
13.7.2 Staff Appropriately for Social Media Communication 400
13.7.3 Ensure Continuous Updating 401
13.7.4 Identify Your Partners 401
13.7.5 Assess and Reassess Your Selection of Platforms 401
13.7.6 Create and Maintain as Many Social Media Accounts as You and Your Stakeholders Need 401
13.7.7 Be Prepared for the Special Social Media Requirements and Pressures in a Crisis 401
13.7.8 Provide Guidance for Employees and Engage Them in the Process 402
13.7.9 Don’t Skip Evaluation 403
13.8 Case Diary: Social Media and the Negative Power of“Junk”Information about Risks and Threats 403
13.9 Lessons Learned and Trends 404
13.10 Chapter Resources 404
Endnotes 408
Index 411
