Description

Book Synopsis
al-Radd al-jamīl attributed to al-Ghazālī (d. 1111) is the most extensive and detailed refutation of the divinity of Jesus by a Muslim author in the classical period of Islam. Since the discovery of the manuscript in the 1930’s scholars have debated whether the great Muslim theologian al-Ghazālī was really the author. This is a new critical edition of the Arabic text and the first complete English translation. The introduction situates this work in the history of Muslim anti-Christian polemical writing. Mark Beaumont and Maha El Kaisy-Friemuth argue that this refutation comes from an admirer of al-Ghazālī who sought to advance some of his key ideas for an Egyptian audience.

Table of Contents
Foreword The Context and Authorship of al-Radd al-jamīl - The Context of al-Radd al-jamīl - The Authorship of al-Radd al-jamīl - Arguments supporting the authorship of al-Ghazālī - al-Radd al-jamīl and the Sufi writing of al-Ghazālī - Arguments against the authorship of al-Ghazālī - When was al-Radd al-jamīl written? - Who wrote al-Radd al-jamīl? - Appendix Outline of al-Radd al-jamīl al-Radd al-jamīl in the Context of Muslim Refutations of Christianity - Jesus’ miracles do not confirm his divinity - The Gospels provide evidence for the fact that Jesus was a messenger sent from God. Passages in the fourth gospel that Christians propose as literal proof for the divinity of Jesus should be interpreted metaphorically - The Jacobite belief that the union of the soul and body is an analogy for the union of the divinity and humanity of Jesus is inappropriate - The Melkite separation of the divine and human natures in Jesus at the point of his death is irrational - The Nestorian conviction that the will of Jesus was united with the will of God is not supported by the Christian gospels - Christian scriptures show that titles given to Jesus that Christians believe point to his divine status should be taken as symbols of his spiritual eminence as a messenger of God - Christian appeal to the Qurʾān to support the divinity of Jesus is mistaken - Conclusion Quotations and References from the Bible Quotations and References from the Qur’ān Index

al-Radd al-jamīl - A Fitting Refutation of the Divinity of Jesus: Attributed to Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī

    Product form

    £114.40

    Includes FREE delivery

    Order before 4pm tomorrow for delivery by Wed 24 Jun 2026.

    A Hardback by Mark Beaumont, Maha El Kaisy-Friemuth

    Out of stock

      Trusted by thousands of customers. See 2,385+ Customer Reviews

      View other formats and editions of al-Radd al-jamīl - A Fitting Refutation of the Divinity of Jesus: Attributed to Abū Ḥāmid al-Ghazālī by Mark Beaumont

      Publisher: Brill
      Publication Date: 29/09/2016
      ISBN13: 9789004321533, 978-9004321533
      ISBN10:

      Description

      Book Synopsis
      al-Radd al-jamīl attributed to al-Ghazālī (d. 1111) is the most extensive and detailed refutation of the divinity of Jesus by a Muslim author in the classical period of Islam. Since the discovery of the manuscript in the 1930’s scholars have debated whether the great Muslim theologian al-Ghazālī was really the author. This is a new critical edition of the Arabic text and the first complete English translation. The introduction situates this work in the history of Muslim anti-Christian polemical writing. Mark Beaumont and Maha El Kaisy-Friemuth argue that this refutation comes from an admirer of al-Ghazālī who sought to advance some of his key ideas for an Egyptian audience.

      Table of Contents
      Foreword The Context and Authorship of al-Radd al-jamīl - The Context of al-Radd al-jamīl - The Authorship of al-Radd al-jamīl - Arguments supporting the authorship of al-Ghazālī - al-Radd al-jamīl and the Sufi writing of al-Ghazālī - Arguments against the authorship of al-Ghazālī - When was al-Radd al-jamīl written? - Who wrote al-Radd al-jamīl? - Appendix Outline of al-Radd al-jamīl al-Radd al-jamīl in the Context of Muslim Refutations of Christianity - Jesus’ miracles do not confirm his divinity - The Gospels provide evidence for the fact that Jesus was a messenger sent from God. Passages in the fourth gospel that Christians propose as literal proof for the divinity of Jesus should be interpreted metaphorically - The Jacobite belief that the union of the soul and body is an analogy for the union of the divinity and humanity of Jesus is inappropriate - The Melkite separation of the divine and human natures in Jesus at the point of his death is irrational - The Nestorian conviction that the will of Jesus was united with the will of God is not supported by the Christian gospels - Christian scriptures show that titles given to Jesus that Christians believe point to his divine status should be taken as symbols of his spiritual eminence as a messenger of God - Christian appeal to the Qurʾān to support the divinity of Jesus is mistaken - Conclusion Quotations and References from the Bible Quotations and References from the Qur’ān Index

      Recently viewed products

      © 2026 Book Curl

        • American Express
        • Apple Pay
        • Diners Club
        • Discover
        • Google Pay
        • Maestro
        • Mastercard
        • PayPal
        • Shop Pay
        • Union Pay
        • Visa

        Login

        Forgot your password?

        Don't have an account yet?
        Create account