Description
Book SynopsisWhich political entities should the international community recognize as member statesgranting them the rights and powers of statehood and entitling them to participate in formulating, adjudicating, and implementing international law? What criteria should it use, and are those criteria defensible? From Kosovo, Palestine, and Taiwan to South Sudan, Scotland, South Ossetia, Abkhazia, and Catalonia, these questions continuously arise and constantly challenge the international community for a consistent, principled stance.In response to this challenge, Chris Naticchia offers a social contract argument for a theory of international recognitiona normative theory of the criteria that states and international bodies should use to recognize political entities as member states of the international community. Regardlessof whether political entities adequately respect human rights or practice democracy, he argues, we must recognize a critical mass of them to get international institutions working.
Trade ReviewWhat criteria should determine which states the international community recognizes? Should we set strict minimum standards or be flexible in the interest of bringing lagging states along in their progress toward justice? Should we recognize states that have seceded from other states, and under what conditions? These are the weighty questions Naticchia (California State Univ., San Bernardino) addresses in this work. Beginning from a starting point of John Rawls’s Law of Peoples, the author first provides a multichapter review of the criticism of Rawls’s social contract theory of international justice. The author concedes much of the criticism and, as a solution, seeks to transform Law of Peoples into a theory of state recognition rather than of international justice. While the review of criticism may be useful to the unfamiliar, it is a lengthy and arguably unnecessary windup for a project that stands on its own merits. That is, the author largely succeeds in creating a Rawlsian theory of recognition. He does so, insightfully, by placing recognition in the realm of Rawls’s nonideal theory for, if the community of nations were operating in the ideal realm, the question of recognition would be moot. Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty. * CHOICE *
This book is a very deft application of moral philosophy to the difficult practical question of which claimants to statehood ought to be internationally recognized. It is bound to generate lively discussion among students of political theory, international relations and international law. -- Mikulas Fabry, Georgia Institute of Technology
In this engaging book, Chris Naticchia develops an original theory of international recognition out of a critical interpretation of John Rawls. In addition to showing that recognition is an important topic in its own right, the book marks a fresh departure for the Rawlsian tradition and shows how political philosophy can combine ideal and non-ideal theory. -- Michael Green, Pomona College
In elaborating a novel interpretation of the project that Rawls undertook in The Law of Peoples, Chris Naticchia's ambitious book makes a strong case for the significance of Rawls's work to the evaluation of the present-day practice of recognition of states. Those who have come to dismiss normative theorizing's relevance to international relations owe it to themselves to consider Naticchia's contribution. -- Brad R. Roth, Wayne State University
Table of ContentsPart One: Critique and Diagnosis: Rawls, The Social Contract, and The Law of Peoples Chapter 1: Introduction Chapter 2: The Law of Peoples: Act I Chapter 3: The Law of Peoples: Act II Chapter 4: The Communitarian Concession Chapter 5: From Justice to Recognition Part Two: Solution: Constructing A Theory of International Recognition Chapter 6: The Justice-based and Pragmatic Theories Chapter 7: The Critical Mass Principle Chapter 8: The Justifiable Secession Principle Chapter 9: The Economic Development Principle Chapter 10: An Appraisal of International Law Epilogue: Brian Barry’s encore
