{"product_id":"the-rhetoric-of-judging-well-9780271094847","title":"The Rhetoric of Judging Well","description":"\u003cb\u003eBook Synopsis\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eA collection of essays providing an interdisciplinary account of U.S. Supreme Court Justice Anthony M. Kennedy's judicial rhetoric. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eTrade Review\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003e“\u003ci\u003eThe Rhetoric of Judging Well\u003c\/i\u003e truly blazes a trail about how to take the rhetoric of legal reasoning out of the partisan, polarized world of legal journalism and bring it intelligibly into public discourse. Rhetoricians will gain copious insights about legal reasoning, and legal scholars will discover rhetorical tools for their research.”\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e—William M. Keith,coauthor of \u003ci\u003eBeyond Civility: The Competing Obligations of Citizenship\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003e“\u003ci\u003eThe Rhetoric of Judging Well\u003c\/i\u003e offers a distinctive approach to legal rhetoric by providing a comprehensive and thorough account of the jurisprudence of a single, important justice. I know of no other book quite like it.”\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e—Austin Sarat,author of \u003ci\u003eWhen Governments Break the Law: The Rule of Law and the Prosecution of the Bush Administration\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eTable of Contents\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eAcknowledgements\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIntroduction\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePart 1. Judgment in Classical Rhetoric\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e1. Justice Kennedy and the Interpretation of Legal Texts: The Classical Background\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eMichael Gagarin\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e2. Sex and Moral Pollution in the Rhetoric of Justice Kennedy\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eEugene Garver\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePart 2. Judgment in Stasis Theory\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e3. Justice Kennedy’s Definitional Construction of Gay Rights in \u003ci\u003eLawrence\u003c\/i\u003e and \u003ci\u003eObergefell\u003c\/i\u003e: Legal Rhetorical Analysis with the Interpretive Stases\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eMartin Camper\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e4. Justice Kennedy, Natural Liberty, and Classical Stasis Theory: Advancing Free Speech with Rhetorical Knowledge and Interpretive Argumentation\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eSusan E. Provenzano\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e5. \u003ci\u003eRomer v. Evans\u003c\/i\u003e: Justice Kennedy, Justice Scalia, and the Rhetoric of Judging Well\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eSean Patrick O’Rourke\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePart 3. Judgment in Contemporary Rhetorical Theory\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e6. Constructing a Free Agent: “Good Judgment” in Justice Kennedy’s \u003cstrong\u003eLawrence v. Texas\u003c\/strong\u003e Opinion\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eClarke Rountree\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e7. Justice Kennedy and Natural Law Argumentation\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eFrancis J. Mootz III\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e8. Justice Kennedy, Federalism, and the Nonproduction of Rhetorical Knowledge\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eDarien Shanske\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePart 4. Judgment and Justice Kennedy’s Ethos\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e9. Justice Kennedy’s Free Speech Optimism\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eAshutosh Bhagwat\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e10. Strongmen and Neurotics: Visible Struggle and the Construction of Judicial Ethos\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eJames A. Gardner\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e11. The Anticlassification Topic and Equal-Liberty Template\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eLeslie Gielow Jacobs\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePart 5. Justice Kennedy’s Misjudgments: Women, Race, and Immigrants\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e12. Performing a “View from Nowhere”: Justice Kennedy’s Denial of Embodied Knowledge\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eElizabeth C. Britt\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e13. Women in Justice Kennedy’s Jurisprudence\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eKathryn Stanchi\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e14. Justice Kennedy’s Anticlassification Doctrine: Not Judging Well\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eRebecca E. Zietlow\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e15. Whose Freedom? Justice Kennedy’s Sovereignty, Autonomy, and Liberty Discourses in the Immigration Cases\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eLeticia M. Saucedo\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePart 6. Assessment\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e16. Rhetorical Vision and Judgment: Did Justice Anthony M. Kennedy Judge Well?\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003ci\u003eDavid A. Frank\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eList of Contributors\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIndex of Cases\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eIndex of Names and Subjects\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"Pennsylvania State University Press","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":49400819941719,"sku":"9780271094847","price":88.36,"currency_code":"GBP","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0817\/1739\/5799\/files\/9780271094847.jpg?v=1730471654","url":"https:\/\/bookcurl.com\/products\/the-rhetoric-of-judging-well-9780271094847","provider":"Book Curl","version":"1.0","type":"link"}