{"product_id":"the-common-fisheries-policy-9781119085645","title":"The Common Fisheries Policy","description":"\u003cb\u003eBook Synopsis\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eWritten by Ernesto Penas of the European Commission''s Directorate-General for Maritime Affairs and Fisheries, this thorough and comprehensive book provides a full understanding of the European Commission''s common fisheries policy (CFP), which is of major importance to all fisheries scientists and managers.\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCommencing with introductory chapters which look at the history behind the CFP, its birth and enlargement, this excellent book continues with chapters covering the major aspects of the CFP including policies on conservation, fishing fleets, structure, control, and environment, the external sector, scientific advice, stakeholders and decision making. Further chapters consider the Mediterranean Sea, aquaculture and the reforms of the CFP. A concluding chapter looks at what''s next for the CFP.\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Common Fisheries Policy is an essential reference for all fisheries managers and fisheries scientists throughout the world, and provides a huge wealth of important informat\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eTrade Review\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\"[This book gives] a very comprehensive overview of EEC\/EU fisheries policy from its earliest days\" (\u003ci\u003eEconomic Affairs\u003c\/i\u003e 26\/04\/2017)\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eTable of Contents\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003ePreface xii\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgements xiii\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDisclaimer xiv\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e1 Why the common fisheries policy is important 1\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEurope and fisheries 1\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CFP as a key European policy 1\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe fishing sector in Europe: some facts 1\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA historical background 3\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe importance of European fishing beyond economics 7\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFishing and national traditions: the difficult balance 8\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFishing and the tragedy of the commons 8\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe importance of geography 8\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe importance of economics and culture 9\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries and international conflict 10\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries and European law 10\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CFP in the Treaty of Rome 10\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFishing in subsequent Treaties 11\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Treaty of Lisbon 12\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries policy and European integration 13\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWho decides what in the CFP? 13\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe importance of history 15\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 16\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 16\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e2 The origin of the CFP 18\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFishing in the 1960s 18\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe context in Europe 18\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe context in the world 19\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe precedents: ICNAF and NEAFC 20\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Commission’s first initiatives 21\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe 1967 Communication 21\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe structures and market\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eregulations of 1970 21\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe enlargement of 1973 22\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe declaration of exclusive fisheries zones as of 1977 24\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRelative stability and The Hague preferences 26\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe basic allocation key 27\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Hague Preferences 28\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe consolidation of relative stability 28\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe regulations of 1983 29\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegulation 170\/83 29\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegulation 171\/83 30\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat remains of the 1983 policy? 31\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe 12]mile regime 31\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRelative stability… 31\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e… But relative stability can change 32\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e…And relative stability can be adjusted annually: quota swaps 33\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe application of The Hague Preferences 34\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 34\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 35\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e3 EU enlargement and the CFP 36\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe first enlargements 36\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe second enlargement: Greece in 1981 36\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSpain and Portugal in 1986: a quantum leap for the CFP 36\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Treaty of Accession 38\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe transitional period and the ‘Western Waters’ Regulation 38\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe first adaptation in 1995 39\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe end of the transitional period in 2002 39\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effort management scheme of the western waters 39\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe biologically sensitive zone 40\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe question of access 41\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe other side effect of accession: the ‘quota hoppers’ 42\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementation of the Western Waters Regulation 43\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther enlargements 43\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSweden, Finland and Austria in 1995 and the failed accession of Norway 43\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe non]accession of Norway 44\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe 2004 enlargement: new Baltic, Mediterranean and land]locked Member States 45\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe enlargement of 2007: the Black Sea 46\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCroatia in 2013 47\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 47\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 48\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e4 The conservation policy 49\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConservation: the core business of the CFP 49\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTACs and quotas: the main conservation instrument of the CFP 50\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe scope of TACs and quotas 51\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTACs and scientific advice: a conflicting relationship 53\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproving TAC setting: from ad hoc discussions to the Policy Statement 55\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNew types of TACs 58\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe elusive multi]species TACs 59\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnforcing TACs 61\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eQuota flexibility 62\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom annual TACs to multi]annual plans 62\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe case of cod 63\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe reform of 2002 and the consolidation of long]term plans 65\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther long term plans 66\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther plans proposed by the Commission 69\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe introduction of fishing effort as a management instrument 71\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCod recovery and effort management 71\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe implementation of effort management 73\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe future of effort management 75\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnical measures 76\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTechnical measures: are they just technical? 76\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome historical background 77\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGear characteristics 78\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMinimum landing sizes: a difficult compromise 82\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eClosed areas\/seasons as technical measures 83\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eClosed areas as a mainstream management instrument 85\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAmending technical measures 85\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementing technical measures 86\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe future of technical measures 88\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs the CFP conservation policy a success? 88\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe slow progress of the conservation policy 88\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Mediterranean 92\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe contribution from long]term management plans 92\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLinkages of the conservation policy with other policy elements 92\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLeisure fishing 94\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 95\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 95\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e5 Fleet policy 99\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe relationship between fleets and resources 99\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFleet capacity and fisheries management 99\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHistorical background: the first fleet policy 100\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe multi]annual guidance programmes 100\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMAGPs for the period 1983–1986 101\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMAGPs for the period 1987–1991 101\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMAGPs for 1992–1996: the Gulland report 102\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe MAGPs 1997–2001: the Lassen report 103\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDid the MAGPs work? 104\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe modest objectives and their implementation 104\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe measurement of capacity 105\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe technological creep 106\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe unpopular image of the policy 106\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther weaknesses of the MAGPs 106\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom MAGPs to Member States’ responsibility: the policy since 2002 107\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe new policy 107\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementation 109\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMAGPs versus Member State responsibility 110\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFleet and structural policy: have they helped each other? 111\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eVessel construction and modernisation: a contribution to overcapacity? 111\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eScrapping 112\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTemporary laying]ups: an instrument to undermine fleet capacity adjustment? 113\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHas the fleet policy delivered? 114\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs there an alternative to fleet policy? The case for rights]based management 115\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre RBM systems a panacea? 116\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 117\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 117\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e6 Structural policy 120\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe structural policy: the oldest component of the CFP 120\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe 43 years of structural policy 121\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe first regulation in 1970 121\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe second instrument in 1976 122\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStructural policy and the birth of the CFP in 1983 122\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe accession of Spain and Portugal and the new regulation in 1986 123\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe first FIFG: 1994–1999 124\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe second FIFG: 2000–2006 125\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe European Fisheries Fund: 2007–2013 125\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementation of the EFF 126\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe new Regulation: EMFF 127\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHas the structural policy resolved the structural problems of the CFP? 127\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe evolution of the financial package 128\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe results: a mixed picture 128\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eProcessing industry 129\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAncillary industries and infrastructures 129\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe development of aquaculture 130\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe improvements in working conditions on board 130\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCommunity]led local development 131\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eContribution to the achievement of CFP objectives 131\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries and subsidies 132\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe fishing sector: a highly subsidised industry? 132\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eState aid 133\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndirect subsidies 134\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effects: subsidies and competitiveness 135\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ‘resource rent’ of the fishing sector in Europe 137\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs there a social dimension in the CFP? 137\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ‘invisible’ part of the CFP 137\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWorking as a fisherman in Europe 139\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe social elements of the CFP 140\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 141\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 141\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e7 The external dimension 144\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe last frontier of the CFP: external resources 144\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe importance of the external sector 145\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA stand]alone policy pillar? 145\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe global governance of fisheries 146\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe development of international fisheries law 146\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlobal governance 149\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSoft law: FAO 149\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture prospects 150\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe recognition of the Union as a world partner for fisheries governance 151\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultilateral management of fisheries 152\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Union in Regional Fisheries Management Organisations (RFMOs): the question of membership 152\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe relationship between the CFP and global fisheries management 155\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe contribution of RFMOs to the development of the CFP 156\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat challenges for the RFMOs? 157\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre resources improving in RFMOs? 160\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther neighbouring relationships.\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCoastal states of the Northeast Atlantic: the case of mackerel 161\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBilateral fisheries agreements 161\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMutual access agreements 162\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAgreements with trade concessions 164\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAgreements with financial compensation 164\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePrivate partnerships 165\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries and international conflict: the Greenland halibut war 167\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 168\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 168\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e8 The mediterranean specificity 170\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CFP in the Mediterranean 170\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA CFP in and for the North Sea and Atlantic 170\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Importance of Mediterranean fisheries 171\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Mediterranean specificity: myth or reality? 171\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe status of Mediterranean fisheries 172\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA different policy approach 175\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe jurisdictional regime of Mediterranean waters 175\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries management under the CFP 178\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe 1994 Regulation 178\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe 2006 Regulation 179\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementation and enforcement 180\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMultilateral management in the Mediterranean 181\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe case of GFCM 181\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eICCAT: the case of Bluefin tuna 182\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Black Sea: the new challenge of the CFP 185\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 186\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 186\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9 Enforcing the CFP 188\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe control pillar of the CFP 188\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy enforcement matters 188\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe question of competence 189\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe historical development of\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ethe control system of the CFP 189\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1982: The first regulation 189\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1987: The second regulation 190\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1993: The third regulation 190\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFurther developments 191\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe evaluation of the control policy 192\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe difficulty of enforcing the CFP 193\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe legislation 193\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMember States’ control 194\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Commission’s role 195\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe industry’s attitude 195\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe issue of sanctions 196\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl as a key factor in the development of the CFP 196\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA case story: control and effort management 197\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFinancing the control of the CFP 197\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe new control regulation 198\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy a new instrument? 198\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegulation 1224\/2009 199\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFuture perspectives 200\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe international dimension of the control of fisheries 200\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNAFO 201\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNEAFC 202\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther cases 202\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl and the international ‘level playing field’: the IUU regulation 202\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl in a global context 202\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe precedents 203\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe IUU Regulation of 2010 204\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementation 205\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePossible future developments 206\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTowards integration of the control of fisheries 207\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEuropean integration: EFCA 207\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSectorial integration: the opportunity of CISE 209\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePolicy integration – control and structural policy: conditionality 209\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 210\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 211\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e10 The scientific advice for the CFP 213\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CFP, a science]based policy 213\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe sources of fisheries research to underpin the CFP 213\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe sources of advice for the CFP 214\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe basic data for science and advice 216\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe processing of the data 217\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe evolution of the scientific advice 218\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom safe biological limits to maximum sustainable yield 218\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom short to long term advice 219\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMoving from single species advice 220\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe case of ‘data poor’ stocks 221\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe precautionary principle 223\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe advice in the Mediterranean 223\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eScience and policy making: an often difficult relationship 224\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eScientists and policy]makers: a different language 224\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eScience and political decisions 224\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries science and enforcement 225\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eScience and industry: from mistrust to cooperation 226\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe future scientific advice: new methodologies and new demands of the reformed CFP after 2013 226\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomic science in the CFP 227\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomic versus biological science in the CFP: closing the gap 227\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Annual Economic Reports 229\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEconomic analysis as a tool for fisheries management 229\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 230\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 230\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e11 Fisheries and the environment 232\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental performance of the CFP 232\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe integration of environmental concerns in the CFP 232\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat has been achieved 233\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries and environment: a difficult relationship 234\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries and the environment as complementary policies 234\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePelagic sharks 235\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhaling 235\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEels 236\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarine mammals 237\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeabirds 237\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental questions as drivers for fisheries decisions 238\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementing environmental law through the CFP 239\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNatura 2000 and the CFP 239\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ecosystem approach 241\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementation in the CFP 241\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eManaging the ecosystem? 243\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Marine Strategy Framework Directive 244\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe notion of ‘balanced harvest’ and the ecosystem approach 245\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ecosystem approach and maritime spatial planning 246\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 247\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 247\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e12 The stakeholders 250\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CFP and the ‘ivory tower’ effect 250\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Advisory Committee for Fisheries and Aquaculture 251\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA historical background 251\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe contribution of ACFA 252\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegional Advisory Councils 253\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe precedents: regional workshops 253\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe establishment of the RACs 254\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe growth phase 254\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRAC composition 255\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAre RACs a success? 256\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon]governmental organisations 257\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe precedents 257\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFrom iconic species to mainstream fisheries 258\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWidening the scope: from campaigners to formal stakeholders 258\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther consultations 259\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInstitutional consultations 259\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSocial dialogue 260\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConsultations with the public at large 260\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNote 260\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 260\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e13 The governance of the CFP 262\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CFP: a ‘central command’ policy? 262\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ‘micromanagement from Brussels’ 262\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ‘culture’ of the December Council 262\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe psychology of decision making 263\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eHorse trading 264\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e‘Paper fish’ and governance 265\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAllocating national quotas: a Member State prerogative 266\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproving decision making 266\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFront loading 267\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effects of the Policy Statement 267\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStreamlining TAC decisions 267\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnlargement and decision\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003emaking by Council 268\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe CFP, a complex policy 268\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe ever increasing complexity 269\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe number of regulations 270\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDuplication of management instruments 271\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe number of Member States in Council 272\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Treaty of Lisbon and co]decision 272\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCo-decision and simplification 272\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCo-decision and societal interests 274\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCouncil versus Parliament: Articles 43(2) and 43(3) 274\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCo-decision and regionalisation 275\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNon-legislative elements for decision making 275\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs co-management an option for the CFP? 276\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 277\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 277\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e14 Aquaculture 278\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs aquaculture part of the CFP? 278\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eA unique part of the CFP 278\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome facts and figures on aquaculture in the EU 278\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe evolution of the EU policy in promoting aquaculture development 279\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEU legislation and aquaculture 280\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAquaculture as part of the structural policy of the CFP 280\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAquaculture and environmental policy 280\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAquaculture and sanitary policy 282\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAquaculture and research policy 283\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAlien species in aquaculture 283\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eStakeholders 283\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe aquaculture strategies 283\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2002: The first strategy 284\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2009: The second strategy 284\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2013: The strategic guidelines 285\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAquaculture strategy and CFP reform 285\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat future for European aquaculture? 286\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEuropean aquaculture: a unique mixture of strengths and weaknesses 286\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe challenges 286\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 289\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 289\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e15 Reforming the CFP: 1992 and 2002 291\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReforming the CFP 291\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe first reform: 1992 292\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe context 292\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe new basic regulation of 1992 293\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementation of the first reform 293\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe second reform: 2002 294\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe context 294\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eVessel construction 295\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLong-term plans 296\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegional Advisory Councils 296\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther issues 297\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat the 2002 reform missed: Maximum Sustainable Yield 298\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe implementation of the 2002 reform 300\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNote 301\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 301\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e16 The CFP reform of 2013 303\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe context for reform and the Green Paper 303\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe reform in 2012: the status quo is not an option 303\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe Green Paper 303\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe proposals 304\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe impact assessment 304\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe package 305\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe discard ban 305\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy a discard ban? 305\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy a top]down approach? 306\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe practical difficulties and the need for flexibility 308\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscard ban and TAC levels 309\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegionalisation 310\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegionalising the CFP: easier said than done 310\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegionalisation and national law: the need for delegated acts 310\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaximum sustainable yield 311\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAccepting the principle 311\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIs MSY a balanced objective? 311\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSY by when? 312\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhich MSY: based on fishing mortality or biomass? 312\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy not Maximum Economic Yield? 313\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSY for mixed fisheries 314\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eTransferable fishing concessions and fleet policy 314\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy a system of transferable rights? 314\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhy did TFCs fail? 315\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe new fleet policy 316\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther issues in the basic regulation 317\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe policy objectives 317\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLong-term management plans 317\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe composition of Advisory Councils 318\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntegration of environmental concerns 318\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eClosed areas 319\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAquaculture 320\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl 320\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eScientific advice and data collection 321\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSmall-scale fishing 321\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDelegated and implementing acts 321\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe external dimension 322\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eContributing to long]term sustainability worldwide 322\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe new market regulation 323\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe new structural instrument: the European Maritime and Fisheries Fund (EMFF) 324\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe proposal 325\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe negotiation and the final regulation 326\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFleet measures 327\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAquaculture 329\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarketing 329\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOutermost regions 330\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eControl and data collection 330\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eProcessing industry 331\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSocial measures 331\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnvironmental measures 332\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther measures 333\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCommunity-led local development 334\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIntegrated maritime policy 335\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eConditionality 335\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eInvestments by the Commission under direct management 336\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe allocation of funds 337\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 339\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 339\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e17 What’s next? 341\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementing the new CFP: a daily affair 341\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementation of the MSY objectives 342\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSY in 2015 or 2020? 342\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSY proxies 342\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMSY in multi-species fisheries 342\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImplementing the discard ban 343\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe necessary changes in current legislation: the ‘omnibus’ proposal 343\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproving selectivity: the next generation of technical measures 343\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreparing the future rules 344\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe problem of ‘choke species’ 344\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFacilitating the discard ban 345\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eControlling the discard ban 346\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eDiscard ban and conservation policy: a new paradigm 346\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegionalisation 347\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eEnhancing regional cooperation 348\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eRegionalisation versus harmonisation 348\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe role of stakeholders 350\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eLong-term multi-species management plans 351\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePlanned versus bottom-up approach 351\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWhat multi-species approach? 351\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eScope of the plans 352\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eOther issues 353\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eImproving the scientific advice 353\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNatura 2000 sites 354\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFishery Protected Areas: a lost opportunity? 354\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe role of consumers 355\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe future of management by fishing effort 355\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe new CFP under co-decision 356\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eCo-decision and policy complexity 356\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAdaptation of legislation 356\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe role of the Commission 356\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eWill the new CFP prevent the ‘tragedy of the commons’? 357\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eFisheries in a wider maritime context: integrated maritime policy 360\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eBlue growth 360\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMaritime Spatial Planning 361\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eMarine knowledge 361\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSome external challenges for the CFP 361\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eThe effects of climate change 362\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePossible increases in fuel prices 363\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePossible changes in the ownership of the means of production 363\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePossible changes in the world’s fisheries governance 364\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eClosing remarks 364\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 365\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 365\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlossary 367\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndex 371\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"John Wiley and Sons Ltd","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":53186830434647,"sku":"9781119085645","price":147.56,"currency_code":"GBP","in_stock":false}],"url":"https:\/\/bookcurl.com\/products\/the-common-fisheries-policy-9781119085645","provider":"Book Curl","version":"1.0","type":"link"}