{"product_id":"landmark-cases-in-public-law-9781509925834","title":"Landmark Cases in Public Law","description":"\u003cb\u003eBook Synopsis\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003ci\u003eLandmark Cases in Public Law \u003c\/i\u003eanswers the need for an historical examination of the leading cases in this field, an examination which is largely absent from the standard textbooks and journal articles of the day. Adopting a contextualised historical approach, this collection of essays by leading specialists in the field provides both an explanation of the importance and impact of the chosen decisions, as well as doctrinal analysis. This approach enables each author to throw light on the driving forces behind the judicial outcomes, and shows how the final reasoning of the court was ultimately as much dependent upon such human factors as the attitudes, conduct, and personalities of the parties, their witnesses, their counsel, and the judges, as the drive to seek legal realignment with the political developments that were widely perceived to be taking place. In this way, this form of analysis provides an exposition of the true stories behind these landmark cases in public law.\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eTable of Contents\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e1. \u003ci\u003eEntick v Carrington \u003c\/i\u003e[1765]: Revisited All the King’s Horses  \u003ci\u003eRichard Gordon\u003c\/i\u003e 2. \u003ci\u003eRidge v Baldwin \u003c\/i\u003e[1964]: ‘Nuff Said’  \u003ci\u003eSH Bailey\u003c\/i\u003e 3. \u003ci\u003ePadfield v Ministry of Agriculture Fisheries and Food \u003c\/i\u003e[1968]: Judges and Parliamentary Democracy  \u003ci\u003eMaurice Sunkin\u003c\/i\u003e 4. \u003ci\u003eAnisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission \u003c\/i\u003e[1968]: In Perspective  \u003ci\u003eDavid Feldman\u003c\/i\u003e 5. \u003ci\u003eCouncil of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service \u003c\/i\u003e[1984]: Reviewing the Prerogative  \u003ci\u003eRichard Drabble\u003c\/i\u003e 6. The \u003ci\u003eFactortame \u003c\/i\u003eLitigation: Sovereignty in Question  \u003ci\u003eJohn M\u003c\/i\u003e\u003ci\u003eC\u003c\/i\u003e\u003ci\u003eEldowney\u003c\/i\u003e 7. \u003ci\u003eM v The Home Office \u003c\/i\u003e[1992]: Ministers and Injunctions  \u003ci\u003eChristopher Forsyth\u003c\/i\u003e 8. \u003ci\u003eA v Secretary of State for the Home Department \u003c\/i\u003e[2005]: The \u003ci\u003eBelmarsh \u003c\/i\u003eCase  \u003ci\u003eRichard Clayton\u003c\/i\u003e 9. \u003ci\u003eR v North and East Devon Health Authority \u003c\/i\u003e[2001]: \u003ci\u003eCoughlan \u003c\/i\u003eand the Development of Public Law  \u003ci\u003eKirsty Hughes\u003c\/i\u003e 10. \u003ci\u003eR (Jackson) v Attorney-General \u003c\/i\u003e[2005]: Reviewing Legislation  \u003ci\u003eElizabeth Wicks\u003c\/i\u003e 11. \u003ci\u003eBancoult \u003c\/i\u003eand the Royal Prerogative in Colonial Constitutional Law  \u003ci\u003eSatvinder S Juss\u003c\/i\u003e 12. \u003ci\u003eAXA General Insurance Ltd v HM Advocate and Others \u003c\/i\u003e[2012]: The Nature of Devolved Legislation and the Role of the Courts  \u003ci\u003eThe Honourable Mr Justice Lewis\u003c\/i\u003e 13. \u003ci\u003eEvans v Attorney General \u003c\/i\u003e[2015]: The Underlying Normativity of Constitutional Disagreement  \u003ci\u003eThomas Fairclough\u003c\/i\u003e Epilogue: \u003ci\u003eMiller\u003c\/i\u003e, the Legislature and the Executive  \u003ci\u003ePaul Craig\u003c\/i\u003e","brand":"Bloomsbury Publishing PLC","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":52084993294679,"sku":"9781509925834","price":58.11,"currency_code":"GBP","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0817\/1739\/5799\/files\/9781509925834.jpg?v=1762207833","url":"https:\/\/bookcurl.com\/products\/landmark-cases-in-public-law-9781509925834","provider":"Book Curl","version":"1.0","type":"link"}