{"product_id":"forensic-anthropology-and-the-united-states-judicial-system-9781119470052","title":"Forensic Anthropology and the United States","description":"\u003cb\u003eBook Synopsis\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003eA guide to the interface between forensic anthropology and the United States legal system Designed for forensic anthropologists at all levels of expertise, Forensic Anthropology and the United States Judicial System offers a comprehensive examination of how to effectively present osteological analyses, research and interpretations in the courtroom. Written by noted experts, the book contains an historical perspective of the topic, a review of current legislation that affects expert testimony as well as vital information on courtroom procedure and judicial expectation of experts. A comprehensive book, Forensic Anthropology and the United States Judicial System explains how to prepare case reports and offers suggestions for getting ready for pre-trial interviews. The book also includes detailed information on affidavits, fee structures and dealing with opposing experts. This book is part of the popular Wiley  American Association for Forensic Sciences series and: Offers a unique volume t\u003cbr\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cb\u003eTable of Contents\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cbr\u003e\u003cp\u003eNotes on contributors xiii\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003ePreface xix\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eSeries preface xxiii\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eForeword xxv\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgments xxix\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAbout the editors xxxi\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eGlossary xxxiii\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePart I Context\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e1 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eConfrontation: where forensic science meets the sixth amendment 3\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eJennifer C. Love and Laura C. Fulginiti\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.1 Sixth amendment 4\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.1.1 \u003ci\u003eOhio v. Roberts,\u003c\/i\u003e 448 U.S. 56 (1980). Argued November 26, 1979 – decided June 23, 1980, 5\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.1.2 \u003ci\u003eCrawford v. Washington,\u003c\/i\u003e 541 U.S. 36 (2004). Argued November 10, 2003 – decided March 8, 2004, 7\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.1.3 \u003ci\u003eMelendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts,\u003c\/i\u003e 557 U.S. 305 (2009). Argued November 10, 2008 – decided June 25, 2009, 8\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.1.4 \u003ci\u003eBullcoming v. New Mexico,\u003c\/i\u003e 564 U.S. 647 (2011). Argued March 2, 2011 – decided June 23, 2011, 10\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.1.5 \u003ci\u003eWilliams v. Illinois, \u003c\/i\u003e567 U.S. 50 (2012). Argued December 6, 2011, – decided June 18, 2012, 11\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.2 Impact on forensic practitioners 12\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.A Appendix 14\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.A.1 Example of Florida application to compel testimony 16\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e1.A.2 Example of Arizona court order in response to Florida request 17\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 17\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e2 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003e“Somewhere in this twilight”: the circumstances leading to the National Academy of Sciences’ report 19\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eThomas Holland and Christian Crowder\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.1 Introduction 19\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.2 The long road to \u003ci\u003eDaubert\u003c\/i\u003e 20\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.2.1 The \u003ci\u003eFrye \u003c\/i\u003estandard of general acceptance 20\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.3 The federal rules of evidence 22\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.4 The rise of the toxic tort 24\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.5 \u003ci\u003eDaubert \u003c\/i\u003eand the supremacy of the FRE 25\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.6 The aftermath of \u003ci\u003eDaubert\u003c\/i\u003e 28\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.7 Llera Plaza and the assault on fingerprints 28\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.8 Fear, reality, and forensic anthropology 30\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.9 The gauntlet is thrown: the NAS gets involved 31\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.10 The CSI effect 31\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.11 The congressional response 32\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.12 The forensic sciences respond 33\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.13 Picking up the gauntlet 34\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e2.14 Conclusions 35\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eNotes 37\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 38\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e3 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eFrom the laboratory to the witness stand: research trends and method validation in forensic anthropology 41\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eJonathan D. Bethard and Elizabeth A. DiGangi\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.1 Introduction 41\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.2 Research in forensic anthropology – a bibliometric survey 43\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.3 Court decisions and research 48\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e3.4 Conclusion and a path forward 49\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgments 50\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 50\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e4 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eExpertise and the expert witness: contemporary educational foundations of forensic anthropology 53\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eKatelyn L. Bolhofner and Andrew C. Seidel\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.1 A brief historical overview of the discipline 54\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.2 The educational background of early forensic anthropologists 55\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.3 The forensic anthropologist as expert witness 57\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.4 Current educational programs and training opportunities 58\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.4.1 Contemporary educational programs for forensic anthropologists 59\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.4.2 Casework and training opportunities 63\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e4.5 Conclusion and future directions 65\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 67\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003ePart II The rubber meets the road\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e5 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eTransparency in forensic anthropology through the implementation of quality assurance practices 71\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eJulie M. Fleischman, Michal L. Pierce, and Christian M. Crowder\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.1 Introduction 71\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.2 Overview of laboratory quality assurance and management 74\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.2.1 Corrective and preventive actions 74\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.3 Training and continuous education 74\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.4 Importance of QA for anthropologists 76\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.5 Quality assurance for forensic anthropology methods and equipment 77\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.5.1 Establishing laboratory SOPs 77\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.6 Various measures of quality 79\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.7 Implications of QA in the courtroom 85\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.7.1 Legal rulings affecting anthropology 85\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.8 Accreditation 86\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e5.9 Conclusions 86\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 87\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e6 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eReport writing and case documentation in forensic anthropology 89\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eLauren Zephro and Alison Galloway\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.1 The audience(s) 90\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.2 The report begins with documentation of workflow 91\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.3 Chain of custody 94\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.4 Managing the information flow 94\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.5 Processing the remains and storage considerations 96\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.6 Contemporaneous bench notes and standard forms 96\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.7 Casting radiography and other methods of documentation 98\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.8 The report 98\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.8.1 Format of the case report 98\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.8.2 Background 99\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.8.3 Condition of the remains 100\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.8.4 Biological profile 101\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.8.5 Trauma analysis 102\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.8.6 Postmortem interval and the time since death 105\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.8.7 Report summary and disposition 106\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.9 Appendices 106\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.10 Final steps 107\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e6.11 Conclusion 108\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 108\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e7 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eSkull shots: forensic photography for anthropologists 109\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eLauren Zephro and Alison Galloway\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.1 Equipment 110\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.2 Taking photographs with an eye to courtroom presentation 110\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.3 Labeling photographs 117\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.4 Photomicroscopy and Videography 118\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.5 Image processing 119\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e7.6 Conclusion 120\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 121\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e8 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe peer review process: expectations and responsibilities 123\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eKristen Hartnett-McCann, Laura C. Fulginiti, Alison Galloway, and Katherine M. Taylor\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.1 Introduction 123\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.2 Historical use of peer review 124\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.3 Principles underlying peer review in Forensic Anthropology 125\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.4 Available guidance on peer review 126\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.5 Considerations 128\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.6 Current status of peer review in forensic anthropological casework 130\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.7 Recommendations on peer review of forensic anthropology case work 131\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.8 Conclusions 136\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eAcknowledgments 136\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.A Example of a peer review form (modified from Dana Austin, personal communication) 137\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e8.B Example of a peer review form (modified from Lauren Zephro, personal communication) 138\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 138\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e9 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eThe United States justice system and forensic anthropology: preparing for court 141\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eDaniel G. Martin and Laura C. Fulginiti\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.1 The United States court system 141\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.1.1 Types of cases 142\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.2 Understanding the judicial process 143\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.2.1 The criminal process 144\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.2.2 The civil process 148\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.3 The role of the forensic anthropologist 151\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.3.1 Criminal cases 151\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.3.2 Civil cases 160\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e9.4 The courtroom: etiquette and pitfalls 162\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 165\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e10 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eLitigation graphics in the courtroom presentation of forensic anthropology 167\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eGary Hodges\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.1 Color 169\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.2 Font 170\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.3 Layout 170\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.4 Clarity of purpose 172\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.5 The problem-solution approach to visual aids 172\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.6 Case study 174\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e10.7 Conclusion 180\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 181\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e11 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eMaintaining independence in an adversarial system: expert witness testimony in forensic anthropology 183\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eEric J. Bartelink, Laura C. Fulginiti, Alison Galloway, and Katherine M. Taylor\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.1 Criminal vs. civil cases 185\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.2 Courtroom roles and rules 187\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.3 Case studies 189\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.3.1 Case study 1 189\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.3.2 Case study 2 191\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.3.3 Case study 3 193\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.3.4 Case study 4 195\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e11.4 Conclusion 196\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 197\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e12 \u003c\/b\u003e\u003cb\u003eValuing your time: appropriate calculation of fees and expenses as an expert witness 199\u003cbr\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e\u003ci\u003eAlison Galloway, Eric J. Bartelink, and Kristen Hartnett-McCann\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.1 History of expert witnesses and compensation 200\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.2 Models of compensation 200\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.2.1 Retainers 201\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.2.2 Fee for service 201\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.2.3 Fee for service considerations 203\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.2.4 Pro bono 205\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.2.5 Reasonable expenses 206\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.3 Unethical billing practices 207\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.4 Invoicing 208\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.5 The professional expert 209\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.6 Conclusions 210\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003e12.A Appendix 211\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eReferences 212\u003c\/p\u003e \u003cp\u003eIndex 213\u003c\/p\u003e","brand":"John Wiley \u0026 Sons Inc","offers":[{"title":"Default Title","offer_id":49407061098839,"sku":"9781119470052","price":999.99,"currency_code":"GBP","in_stock":false}],"url":"https:\/\/bookcurl.com\/products\/forensic-anthropology-and-the-united-states-judicial-system-9781119470052","provider":"Book Curl","version":"1.0","type":"link"}